Minimal invasiveness in the transcrestal elevation of the maxillary sinus floor: A systematic review.
alveolar process
bone regeneration
bone resorption
dental implants
maxillary sinus
minimally invasive
surgical procedures
Journal
Periodontology 2000
ISSN: 1600-0757
Titre abrégé: Periodontol 2000
Pays: Denmark
ID NLM: 9313276
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2023
02 2023
Historique:
revised:
10
06
2022
received:
22
04
2022
accepted:
23
06
2022
medline:
11
5
2023
pubmed:
2
8
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In the attempt to reduce the invasiveness of a transcrestal sinus floor elevation procedure, different aspects must be considered; that is, the minimization of intra- and postsurgery morbidity, the reduction of treatment time, and the simplification/elimination of the reconstructive technology. Within this context, a systematic literature search was performed for controlled clinical trials evaluating the impact of one or more of these aspects on transcrestal sinus floor elevation invasiveness. Nineteen articles (15 studies) were included. Overall, the results confirmed that transcrestal sinus floor elevation is a minimally invasive and effective option for bone augmentation in the edentulous, atrophic posterior maxilla. By using powered instruments rather than manual osteotomes and hand mallet, the invasiveness of transcrestal sinus floor elevation can be further reduced without affecting its clinical effectiveness. To impact effectively on morbidity, the key elements to consider when selecting instruments for transcrestal sinus floor elevation are (a) their availability as a standardized sequence, to be adapted on predetermined residual bone height, and (b) the possibility to control pressure (eg, with screwable osteotomes) and/or instrument excursion (eg, with stop devices) to fracture the maxillary sinus floor. Among powered instruments, a standardized sequence of drills incorporating a trephine drill seem to be particularly indicated, due to reduced chair time, high tolerability for the patient, and the possibility to isolate a bone core to implement histomorphometric outcomes. At molar extraction sites with an interradicular septum characterized by a height of at least 4 mm, immediate transcrestal sinus floor elevation and implant placement can be considered a valid option to shorten treatment time.
Types de publication
Systematic Review
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
145-166Informations de copyright
© 2022 The Authors. Periodontology 2000 published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Tatum OH. Lecture presented to Alabama Implant Study Group. 1977.
Tatum H Jr. Maxillary and sinus implant reconstructions. Dent Clin N Am. 1986;30(2):207-229.
Summers RB. A new concept in maxillary implant surgery: the osteotome technique. Compendium. 1994;15(2):152 154-6, 158 passim; quiz 162.
Summers RB. The osteotome technique: part 3-less invasive methods of elevating the sinus floor. Compendium. 1994;15(6):698 700, 702-4 passim; quiz 710.
Trombelli L, Farina R, Franceschetti G, et al. Sinus augmentation-the transcrestal approach. In: Artzi Z, ed. Bone Augmentation by Anatomical Region: Techniques & Decision Making. Wiley Blackwell; 2020;chapter 14:255-281.
Coatoam GW. Indirect sinus augmentation procedures using one-stage anatomically shaped root-form implants. J Oral Implantol. 1997;23(1-2):25-42.
Bruschi GB, Scipioni A, Calesini G, Bruschi E. Localized management of sinus floor with simultaneous implant placement: a clinical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998;13(2):219-226.
Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20(5):476-485.
Cosci F, Luccioli M. A new sinus lift technique in conjunction with placement of 265 implants: a 6-year retrospective study. Implant Dent. 2000;9(4):363-368.
Soltan M, Smiler DG. Trephine bone core sinus elevation graft. Implant Dent. 2004;13(2):148-152.
Le Gall MG. Localized sinus elevation and osteocompression with single-stage tapered dental implants: technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004;19(3):431-437.
Vitkov L, Gellrich NC, Hannig M. Sinus floor elevation via hydraulic detachment and elevation of the Schneiderian membrane. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(5):615-621.
Chen L, Cha J. An 8-year retrospective study: 1,100 patients receiving 1,557 implants using the minimally invasive hydraulic sinus condensing technique. J Periodontol. 2005;76(3):482-491.
Borgonovo AE, Vitaliano T, Medagliani P, Bianchi A, Re D. Crestal sinus lift by using a mini-invasive procedure: a case series. Minerva Stomatol. 2016;65(2):107-117.
Fugazzotto PA. Immediate implant placement following a modified trephine/osteotome approach: success rates of 116 implants to 4 years in function. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2002;17(1):113-120.
Kim JM, Sohn DS, Heo JU, et al. Minimally invasive sinus augmentation using ultrasonic piezoelectric vibration and hydraulic pressure: a multicenter retrospective study. Implant Dent. 2012;21(6):536-542.
Trombelli L, Minenna P, Franceschetti G, et al. Smart-Lift technique for the elevation of the maxillary sinus floor with a transcrestal approach. Implant Dent. 2008;6:9-18. (in Italian).
Trombelli L, Minenna P, Franceschetti G, et al. Smart-Lift: a new minimally-invasive procedure for sinus floor elevation. Dent Cadmos. 2008;76:71-83. (in Italian).
Trombelli L, Minenna P, Franceschetti G, Minenna L, Farina R. Transcrestal sinus floor elevation with a minimally invasive technique. J Periodontol. 2010;81(1):158-166.
Trombelli L, Minenna P, Franceschetti G, Minenna L, Itro A, Farina R. Minimally invasive technique for transcrestal sinus floor elevation: a case report. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2010;41(5):363-369.
Better H, Slavescu D, Barbu H, Cochran DL, Chaushu G. Minimally invasive sinus lift implant device: a multicenter safety and efficacy trial preliminary results. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(4):520-526.
Kfir E, Kfir V, Mijiritsky E, Rafaeloff R, Kaluski E. Minimally invasive antral membrane balloon elevation followed by maxillary bone augmentation and implant fixation. J Oral Implantol. 2006;32(1):26-33.
Del Fabbro M, Corbella S, Weinstein T, et al. Implant survival rates after osteotome-mediated maxillary sinus augmentation: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012;14(Suppl 1):e159-e168.
Călin C, Petre A, Drafta S. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(3):558-576.
Pjetursson BE, Lang NP. Sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach. Periodontol 2000. 2014;66(1):59-71.
Shi JY, Gu YX, Zhuang LF, Lai HC. Survival of implants using the osteotome technique with or without grafting in the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2016;31(5):1077-1088.
Antonoglou GN, Stavropoulos A, Samara MD, et al. Clinical performance of dental implants following sinus floor augmentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with at least 3 years of follow-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(3):e45-e65.
Aludden H, Mordenfeld A, Hallman M, Christensen AE, Starch-Jensen T. Osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with or without a grafting material: a systematic review and meta-analysis of long-term studies (≥5-years). Implant Dent. 2018;27(4):488-497.
Chen MH, Shi JY. Clinical and radiological outcomes of implants in osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. J Prosthodont. 2018;27(5):394-401.
Al-Moraissi EA, Altairi NH, Abotaleb B, et al. What is the most effective rehabilitation method for posterior maxillas with 4 to 8 mm of residual alveolar bone height below the maxillary sinus with implant-supported prostheses? A frequentist network meta-analysis. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(1):70.e1-70.e33.
Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, et al. Morbidity following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: a randomized trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(9):1128-1139.
Farina R, Simonelli A, Franceschetti G, et al. Peri-implant tissue conditions following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: three-year results of a bi-center, randomized trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2022;26:3975-3986.
Farina R, Franceschetti G, Travaglini D, et al. Radiographic outcomes of transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: one-year results of a bi-center, parallel-arm randomized trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30(9):910-919.
Farina R, Simonelli A, Franceschetti G, et al. Implant-supported rehabilitation following transcrestal and lateral sinus floor elevation: analysis of costs and quality of life from a bi-center, parallel-arm randomized trial. Minerva Dent Oral Sci. 2022;71(1):16-24.
Polak D, Shapira L. From maximally to minimally invasive surgery for sinus floor augmentation. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2013;34(Spec No):19-24. quiz 25.
Stacchi C, Spinato S, Lombardi T, et al. Minimally invasive management of implant-supported rehabilitation in the posterior maxilla, part II. Surgical techniques and decision tree. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020;40(3):e95-e102.
Franceschetti G, Rizzi A, Minenna L, Pramstraller M, Trombelli L, Farina R. Patient-reported outcomes of implant placement performed concomitantly with transcrestal sinus floor elevation or entirely in native bone. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(2):156-162.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29(372):n71.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;29(372):n160.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
Sammartino G, Mariniello M, Scaravilli MS. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo following closed sinus floor elevation procedure: mallet osteotomes vs. screwable osteotomes. A triple blind randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(6):669-672.
Chandra RV, Suvvari N, Reddy AA. Trephine core procedure versus bone-added osteotome sinus floor elevation in the augmentation of the sinus floor: a comparative clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2018;33(2):425-432.
Checchi L, Felice P, Antonini ES, et al. Crestal sinus lift for implant rehabilitation: a randomised clinical trial comparing the Cosci and the Summers techniques. A preliminary report on complications and patient preference. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2010;3(3):221-232.
Baldi D, Menini M, Pera F, Ravera G, Pera P. Sinus floor elevation using osteotomes or piezoelectric surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;40(5):497-503.
Esposito M, Cannizzaro G, Barausse C, Cosci F, Soardi E, Felice P. Cosci versus Summers technique for crestal sinus lift: 3-year results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014;7(2):129-137.
Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. Electrical mallet provides essential advantages in maxillary bone condensing. A prospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2013;15(6):874-882.
Crespi R, Capparè P, Gherlone E. A comparison of manual and electrical mallet in maxillary bone condensing for immediately loaded implants: a randomized study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2014;16(3):374-382.
Liu H, Liu R, Wang M, Yang J. Immediate implant placement combined with maxillary sinus floor elevation utilizing the transalveolar approach and nonsubmerged healing for failing teeth in the maxillary molar area: a randomized controlled trial clinical study with one-year follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019;21(3):462-472.
Trombelli L, Franceschetti G, Rizzi A, Minenna P, Minenna L, Farina R. Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation with graft biomaterials. A randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(4):424-432.
Trombelli L, Franceschetti G, Stacchi C, et al. Minimally invasive transcrestal sinus floor elevation with deproteinized bovine bone or β-tricalcium phosphate: a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(3):311-319.
Lai HC, Zhuang LF, Lv XF, Zhang ZY, Zhang YX, Zhang ZY. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a preliminary clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(5):520-526.
Nedir R, Nurdin N, Khoury P, et al. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without grafting material in the severely atrophic maxilla. A 1-year prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013;24(11):1257-1264.
Si MS, Zhuang LF, Gu YX, Mo JJ, Qiao SC, Lai HC. Osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without grafting: a 3-year randomized controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40(4):396-403.
Merheb J, Nurdin N, Bischof M, Gimeno-Rico M, Quirynen M, Nedir R. Stability evaluation of implants placed in the atrophic maxilla using osteotome sinus floor elevation with and without bone grafting: a 5-year prospective study. Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2019;12(3):337-346.
Starch-Jensen T, Bruun NH. Patient's perception of recovery after osteotome-mediated sinus floor elevation with Bio-Oss collagen compared with no grafting material: a randomized single-blinded controlled trial. Int J Implant Dent. 2021;7(1):20.
Nedir R, Nurdin N, Khoury P, Bischof M. Short implants placed with or without grafting in atrophic sinuses: the 3-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016;18(1):10-18.
Nedir R, Nurdin N, Abi Najm S, el Hage M, Bischof M. Short implants placed with or without grafting into atrophic sinuses: the 5-year results of a prospective randomized controlled study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017;28(7):877-886.
Qian SJ, Mo JJ, Si MS, Qiao SC, Shi JY, Lai HC. Long-term outcomes of osteotome sinus floor elevation with or without bone grafting: the 10-year results of a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2020;47(8):1016-1025.
Cho YS, Hwang KG, Jun SH, Tallarico M, Kwon AM, Park CJ. Radiologic comparative analysis between saline and platelet-rich fibrin filling after hydraulic transcrestal sinus lifting without adjunctive bone graft: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020;31(11):1087-1093.
Al-Moraissi EA, Alkhutari AS, Abotaleb B, et al. Do osteoconductive bone substitutes result in similar bone regeneration for maxillary sinus augmentation when compared to osteogenic and osteoinductive bone grafts? A systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(1):107-120.