Covariance-based vs. correlation-based functional connectivity dissociates healthy aging from Alzheimer disease.
Aging
Autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease
Covariance
Late onset Alzheimer disease
Resting-state functional connectivity
Journal
NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 11 2022
01 11 2022
Historique:
received:
13
02
2022
revised:
04
07
2022
accepted:
22
07
2022
pubmed:
2
8
2022
medline:
24
8
2022
entrez:
1
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Prior studies of aging and Alzheimer disease have evaluated resting state functional connectivity (FC) using either seed-based correlation (SBC) or independent component analysis (ICA), with a focus on particular functional systems. SBC and ICA both are insensitive to differences in signal amplitude. At the same time, accumulating evidence indicates that the amplitude of spontaneous BOLD signal fluctuations is physiologically meaningful. We systematically compared covariance-based FC, which is sensitive to amplitude, vs. correlation-based FC, which is not, in affected individuals and controls drawn from two cohorts of participants including autosomal dominant Alzheimer disease (ADAD), late onset Alzheimer disease (LOAD), and age-matched controls. Functional connectivity was computed over 222 regions of interest and group differences were evaluated in terms of components projected onto a space of lower dimension. Our principal observations are: (1) Aging is associated with global loss of resting state fMRI signal amplitude that is approximately uniform across resting state networks. (2) Thus, covariance FC measures decrease with age whereas correlation FC is relatively preserved in healthy aging. (3) In contrast, symptomatic ADAD and LOAD both lead to loss of spontaneous activity amplitude as well as severely degraded correlation structure. These results demonstrate a double dissociation between age vs. Alzheimer disease and the amplitude vs. correlation structure of resting state BOLD signals. Modeling results suggest that the AD-associated loss of correlation structure is attributable to a relative increase in the fraction of locally restricted as opposed to widely shared variance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35914670
pii: S1053-8119(22)00627-9
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119511
pmc: PMC9750733
mid: NIHMS1850784
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
119511Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P30 AG066444
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/L023784/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG062667
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : K01 AG053474
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG003991
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG026276
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR014449
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIBIB NIH HHS
ID : R01 EB009352
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01 AG036694
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R01 AG052550
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : P30 NS098577
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : P30 NS048056
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR002345
Pays : United States
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/009076/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR012657
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR000448
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : UF1 AG032438
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : S10 OD025214
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINR NIH HHS
ID : R01 NR012907
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : P01 NS080675
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : U19 AG032438
Pays : United States
Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : R25 NS090978
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest Randall J. Bateman Randall Bateman (RJB), Professor of Neurology at Washington University's School of Medicine (WUSM) receives lab research funding from the National Institutes of Health, Alzheimer's Association, BrightFocus Foundation, Rainwater Foundation Tau Consortium, Association for Frontotemporal Degeneration, the Cure Alzheimer's Fund, Centene Corporation, Tau SILK Consortium (AbbVie, Biogen, and Eli Lilly and Company), and an anonymous organization. RJB has received honoraria as a speaker/consultant/advisory board member from Amgen, AC Immune, Eisai, F. Hoffman-LaRoche, and Janssen; and reimbursement of travel expenses from AC Immune, F. Hoffman-La Roche and Janssen. Unrelated to this article, RJB serves as principal investigator of the DIAN-TU, which is supported by the Alzheimer's Association, GHR Foundation, an anonymous organization and the DIAN-TU Pharma Consortium (Active: Eli Lilly and Company/Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, F. Hoffman-La Roche/Genentech, Biogen, Eisai, Janssen, and United Neuroscience. Previous: Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Forum, Mithridion, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi). The DIAN-TU-001 Clinical Trial is supported by Pharmaceutical Partners Eli Lilly and Company, F. Hoffman-La Roche and Janssen, the Alzheimer's Association, NIH U01AG042791, NIH U01AG42791-S1 (FNIH and Accelerating Medicines Partnership), NIH R01AG046179, NIH R56AG053267, NIH R01AG053267, NIH U01AG059798, NIH R01AG068319, Avid Radiopharmaceuticals, GHR Foundation, and an anonymous organization. In-kind support has been received from CogState and Bracket. Washington University, Randall Bateman, and David Holtzman have equity ownership interest in C2N Diagnostics and receive royalty income based on technology (stable isotope labeling kinetics and blood plasma assay) licensed by Washington University to C2N Diagnostics. RJB receives income from C2N Diagnostics for serving on the scientific advisory board. Washington University, with RJB as co-inventor, has submitted the US nonprovisional patent application “Methods for Measuring the Metabolism of CNS Derived Biomolecules In Vivo” and provisional patent application “Plasma Based Methods for Detecting CNS Amyloid Deposition”. Tammie L.S. Benzinger Dr. Benzinger reports grants and non-financial support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals/ Eli Lilly, during the conduct of the study; grants and non-financial support from Avid Radiopharmaceuticals/ Eli Lilly, other from Eli Lilly, Biogen, Eisai, Jaansen, personal fees from Biogen, non-financial support from Eisai, non-financial support from Siemens, outside the submitted work. Matthew R. Brier Dr. Brier reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study. Gregory S. Day Dr. Day reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Parabon Nanolabs, Inc, personal fees from DynaMed (EBSCO Health), outside the submitted work. Brian A. Gordon Dr. Gordon reports participation in clinical trials of therapies to alter the course of Alzheimer Disease. Neill Graff-Radford Dr. Graff-Radford reports grants from NIH, during the conduct of the study; grants from Biogen, grants from AbbVie, grants from Lilly, outside the submitted work. Taleshi Ikeuchi Dr. Ikeuchi reports grants from AMED (Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development), during the conduct of the study. Daniel S. Marcus Dr. Marcus reports other from Radiologics, Inc, outside the submitted work. John C. Morris Dr. Morris reports grants from NIH grant P30 AG066444, grants from NIH grant P01AG003991, grants from NIH grant P01AG026276, grants from NIH grant UF1AG032438, during the conduct of the study. Richard J. Perrin Dr. Perrin reports grants from NIH during the conduct of the study. Stephen Salloway Dr. Salloway reports grants and personal fees from Biogen, grants and personal fees from Eisai, grants and personal fees from Avid, grants and personal fees from Lilly, personal fees from Genentech, personal fees from Novartis, grants and personal fees from Roche, outside the submitted work. Peter Schofield Dr. Schofield reports grants from NIH, grants from Anonymous Foundation, grants from Roth Charitable Foundation, during the conduct of the study. Abraham Z. Snyder Dr. Snyder is a consultant for Sora Neuroimaging, LLC.
Références
Brain. 2018 May 1;141(5):1486-1500
pubmed: 29522171
N Engl J Med. 2012 Aug 30;367(9):795-804
pubmed: 22784036
Neuroimage. 2020 Jan 15;205:116289
pubmed: 31629827
Brain Res. 2017 Jan 15;1655:23-32
pubmed: 27847196
Neuron. 2015 Aug 5;87(3):657-70
pubmed: 26212711
Hum Brain Mapp. 2021 Jun 15;42(9):2941-2968
pubmed: 33942449
J Neurosci Methods. 2019 Apr 1;317:121-140
pubmed: 30593787
Mov Disord. 2020 Mar;35(3):499-503
pubmed: 31854465
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Feb;38(2):882-899
pubmed: 27739635
Neuroimage. 2021 Nov 15;242:118466
pubmed: 34389443
Neuroimage. 2013 Aug 1;76:332-44
pubmed: 23507382
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Mar;23(3):195-203
pubmed: 28079014
Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 18;16:825547
pubmed: 35368291
Nat Rev Neurol. 2021 Sep;17(9):580-589
pubmed: 34239130
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 06;10(4):e0120988
pubmed: 25844531
Neurobiol Aging. 2015 Dec;36(12):3255-3268
pubmed: 26363813
J Neurosci. 2003 Apr 15;23(8):3295-301
pubmed: 12716936
Front Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 06;9:671
pubmed: 30574100
Cereb Cortex. 2017 Oct 1;27(10):4719-4732
pubmed: 27591147
J Nucl Med. 2010 Jun;51(6):913-20
pubmed: 20501908
Neuroimage. 2017 Nov 1;161:171-178
pubmed: 28756238
Hum Brain Mapp. 2017 Jan;38(1):561-573
pubmed: 27654880
J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 24;25(34):7709-17
pubmed: 16120771
Neuropathology. 2015 Aug;35(4):390-400
pubmed: 25964057
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2022 May;42(5):876-890
pubmed: 34861133
J Neurosci Methods. 2016 Feb 1;259:22-39
pubmed: 26642966
Neuroimage. 2015 Nov 1;121:29-38
pubmed: 26208872
Nature. 2010 Mar 25;464(7288):529-35
pubmed: 20336135
Neuroimage. 2007 Aug 1;37(1):90-101
pubmed: 17560126
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2011 Jan 06;3(1):1
pubmed: 21211070
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2001 Jan;20(1):45-57
pubmed: 11293691
Neuroimage. 1997 Oct;6(3):156-67
pubmed: 9344820
Nat Commun. 2020 Jan 17;11(1):347
pubmed: 31953405
Neuroimage. 2020 Feb 1;206:116290
pubmed: 31634545
Neuropsychol Rev. 2014 Mar;24(1):49-62
pubmed: 24562737
Neurology. 2018 Oct 2;91(14):e1295-e1306
pubmed: 30217935
Front Aging Neurosci. 2019 Dec 17;11:350
pubmed: 32009939
Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Jun;17(6):1005-1016
pubmed: 33480178
Brain. 2019 Apr 1;142(4):1063-1076
pubmed: 30753379
J Neurosci. 2012 Jun 27;32(26):8890-9
pubmed: 22745490
Sci Transl Med. 2013 Jun 12;5(189):189ra77
pubmed: 23761040
Neuroimage Clin. 2020;28:102491
pubmed: 33395982
Hum Brain Mapp. 2015 Aug;36(8):3104-16
pubmed: 25959682
Neuroimage. 2020 May 1;211:116662
pubmed: 32088317
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):782-90
pubmed: 21979382
JAMA Neurol. 2014 Sep;71(9):1111-22
pubmed: 25069482
Neuroimage. 2014 Sep;98:176-83
pubmed: 24814209
Cereb Cortex. 2012 Nov;22(11):2610-21
pubmed: 22128194
J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;57(2):331-352
pubmed: 28269778
Cereb Cortex. 2020 Oct 1;30(11):5686-5701
pubmed: 32515824
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2008;2008:94-7
pubmed: 19162602
Neurology. 2014 Oct 28;83(18):1613-9
pubmed: 25261500
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2011 Nov;70(11):960-9
pubmed: 22002422
Cell Metab. 2017 Aug 1;26(2):353-360.e3
pubmed: 28768174
Brain Imaging Behav. 2014 Jun;8(2):274-83
pubmed: 24008589
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 2016 Mar;75(3):284-90
pubmed: 26888304
Neuroimage. 2010 Jan 15;49(2):1432-45
pubmed: 19782143
Ann Neurol. 2012 Oct;72(4):571-7
pubmed: 23109152
Neuroimage. 2013 Nov 15;82:616-633
pubmed: 23735260
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013 Mar;37(3):384-400
pubmed: 23333262
Biol Psychiatry. 2013 Sep 1;74(5):340-7
pubmed: 23290495
Brain. 2016 Aug;139(Pt 8):2109-10
pubmed: 27457228
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2019 Dec;28(6):317-324
pubmed: 31794504
Biol Psychiatry. 2010 Mar 15;67(6):584-7
pubmed: 19833321
Brain Struct Funct. 2021 May;226(4):1067-1098
pubmed: 33604746
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 15;160:32-40
pubmed: 28159687
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jun 1;29(6):2509-2523
pubmed: 29878081
Neuroimage. 2018 Aug 1;176:246-258
pubmed: 29709628
Neuron. 2017 Aug 16;95(4):791-807.e7
pubmed: 28757305
Front Psychol. 2015 May 21;6:663
pubmed: 26052298
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 5;12(6):e0178529
pubmed: 28582450
Int J Alzheimers Dis. 2011;2011:535816
pubmed: 21760988
J Nucl Med. 2020 Sep;61(9):1341-1347
pubmed: 32358091
Neurology. 2011 Oct 18;77(16):1524-31
pubmed: 21975202
Sci Transl Med. 2016 May 11;8(338):338ra66
pubmed: 27169802
Neuroimage. 2018 Jun;173:540-550
pubmed: 29476911
Front Neurosci. 2018 Dec 20;12:975
pubmed: 30618593
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 06;8(11):e73377
pubmed: 24223109
Neuroimage. 2019 Jul 1;194:211-227
pubmed: 30902641
Neuroimage. 2012 Feb 1;59(3):2142-54
pubmed: 22019881
Mol Neurobiol. 2021 Jun;58(6):2862-2873
pubmed: 33523358
Neurology. 1993 Nov;43(11):2412-4
pubmed: 8232972
Neuroimage. 2010 Feb 1;49(3):2021-32
pubmed: 19878723
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Jul;14(7):721-30
pubmed: 15054051
J Neurosci. 2010 Apr 7;30(14):4914-21
pubmed: 20371811
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 30;101(13):4637-42
pubmed: 15070770
Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 1;29(1):145-54
pubmed: 16202626
Lancet Neurol. 2018 Mar;17(3):241-250
pubmed: 29397305
Neuroimage. 2017 Oct 1;159:57-69
pubmed: 28712995
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2019 Oct;20(10):593-608
pubmed: 31492945
Neuron. 2007 Dec 6;56(5):924-35
pubmed: 18054866
J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33 Suppl 1:S163-72
pubmed: 22669012
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 15;62(2):774-81
pubmed: 22248573
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2014;37:161-81
pubmed: 25032494
Ann Neurol. 2004 Mar;55(3):306-19
pubmed: 14991808