Assessing the content validity of the revised Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+: the HoNOS Older Adults.

Older adults content validity measurement properties mental health services routine outcome measurement

Journal

BJPsych bulletin
ISSN: 2056-4694
Titre abrégé: BJPsych Bull
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101650950

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
medline: 3 8 2022
pubmed: 3 8 2022
entrez: 2 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Recently, the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales 65+ (HoNOS65+) were revised. Twenty-five experts from Australia and New Zealand completed an anonymous web-based survey about the content validity of the revised measure, the HoNOS Older Adults (HoNOS OA). All 12 HoNOS OA scales were rated by most (≥75%) experts as 'important' or 'very important' for determining overall clinical severity among older adults. Ratings of sensitivity to change, comprehensibility and comprehensiveness were more variable, but mostly positive. Experts' comments provided possible explanations. For example, some experts suggested modifying or expanding the glossary examples for some scales (e.g. those measuring problems with relationships and problems with activities of daily living) to be more older adult-specific. Experts agreed that the HoNOS OA measures important constructs. Training may need to orient experienced raters to the rationale for some revisions. Further psychometric testing of the HoNOS OA is recommended.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35916442
doi: 10.1192/bjb.2022.37
pii: S2056469422000377
pmc: PMC10387420
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

195-202

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health, Australian Government
Organisme : Ministry of Health, New Zealand

Références

Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:435-8
pubmed: 10616612
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005 Nov 28;3:76
pubmed: 16313678
West J Nurs Res. 2003 Aug;25(5):508-18
pubmed: 12955968
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:389-94
pubmed: 10616602
Australas Psychiatry. 2020 Apr;28(2):206-209
pubmed: 31564114
Res Nurs Health. 1997 Jun;20(3):269-74
pubmed: 9179180
Qual Res Psychol. 2015 Apr 3;12(2):202-222
pubmed: 27499705
Aging Ment Health. 2004 Sep;8(5):387-96
pubmed: 15511736
Australas Psychiatry. 2009 Apr;17(2):141-8
pubmed: 19016362
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):978-88
pubmed: 22152166
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97
pubmed: 16977646
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170
pubmed: 29550964
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Dec;42(6):248-252
pubmed: 30221612
Br J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;172:11-8
pubmed: 9534825
Br J Psychiatry. 1999 May;174:424-7
pubmed: 10616609
BJPsych Bull. 2018 Apr;42(2):63-68
pubmed: 29502543
Nurs Res. 1986 Nov-Dec;35(6):382-5
pubmed: 3640358
J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci. 2012 Jan;51(1):63-8
pubmed: 22330870

Auteurs

Meredith G Harris (MG)

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane, Australia.

Caley Tapp (C)

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane, Australia.

Urska Arnautovska (U)

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane, Australia.

Tim Coombs (T)

Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Sydney, Australia.

Rosemary Dickson (R)

Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Sydney, Australia.

Mark Smith (M)

Te Pou, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Angela Jury (A)

Te Pou, Auckland, New Zealand.

Jennifer Lai (J)

Te Pou, Auckland, New Zealand.

Mick James (M)

Royal College of Psychiatrists, London, UK.

Jon Painter (J)

Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.

Philip M Burgess (PM)

The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Australian Mental Health Outcomes and Classification Network, Brisbane, Australia.

Classifications MeSH