Integrating Top-down and Bottom-up Requirements in eHealth Development: The Case of a Mobile Self-compassion Intervention for People With Newly Diagnosed Cancer.
cancer
co-design
eHealth
evidence-based
mobile phone
requirements
self-compassion
Journal
JMIR cancer
ISSN: 2369-1999
Titre abrégé: JMIR Cancer
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101666844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Aug 2022
01 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
25
02
2022
accepted:
24
05
2022
revised:
09
05
2022
entrez:
2
8
2022
pubmed:
3
8
2022
medline:
3
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Psychosocial eHealth interventions for people with cancer are promising in reducing distress; however, their results in terms of effects and adherence rates are quite mixed. Developing interventions with a solid evidence base while still ensuring adaptation to user wishes and needs is recommended to overcome this. As most models of eHealth development are based primarily on examining user experiences (so-called bottom-up requirements), it is not clear how theory and evidence (so-called top-down requirements) may best be integrated into the development process. This study aims to investigate the integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements in the co-design of eHealth applications by building on the development of a mobile self-compassion intervention for people with newly diagnosed cancer. Four co-design tasks were formulated at the start of the project and adjusted and evaluated throughout: explore bottom-up experiences, reassess top-down content, incorporate bottom-up and top-down input into concrete features and design, and synergize bottom-up and top-down input into the intervention context. These tasks were executed iteratively during a series of co-design sessions over the course of 2 years, in which 15 people with cancer and 7 nurses (recruited from 2 hospitals) participated. On the basis of the sessions, a list of requirements, a final intervention design, and an evaluation of the co-design process and tasks were yielded. The final list of requirements included intervention content (eg, major topics of compassionate mind training such as psychoeducation about 3 emotion systems and main issues that people with cancer encounter after diagnosis such as regulating information consumption), navigation, visual design, implementation strategies, and persuasive elements. The final intervention, Compas-Y, is a mobile self-compassion training comprising 6 training modules and several supportive functionalities such as a mood tracker and persuasive elements such as push notifications. The 4 co-design tasks helped overcome challenges in the development process such as dealing with conflicting top-down and bottom-up requirements and enabled the integration of all main requirements into the design. This study addressed the necessary integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements into eHealth development by examining a preliminary model of 4 co-design tasks. Broader considerations regarding the design of a mobile intervention based on traditional intervention formats and merging the scientific disciplines of psychology and design research are discussed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Psychosocial eHealth interventions for people with cancer are promising in reducing distress; however, their results in terms of effects and adherence rates are quite mixed. Developing interventions with a solid evidence base while still ensuring adaptation to user wishes and needs is recommended to overcome this. As most models of eHealth development are based primarily on examining user experiences (so-called bottom-up requirements), it is not clear how theory and evidence (so-called top-down requirements) may best be integrated into the development process.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
This study aims to investigate the integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements in the co-design of eHealth applications by building on the development of a mobile self-compassion intervention for people with newly diagnosed cancer.
METHODS
METHODS
Four co-design tasks were formulated at the start of the project and adjusted and evaluated throughout: explore bottom-up experiences, reassess top-down content, incorporate bottom-up and top-down input into concrete features and design, and synergize bottom-up and top-down input into the intervention context. These tasks were executed iteratively during a series of co-design sessions over the course of 2 years, in which 15 people with cancer and 7 nurses (recruited from 2 hospitals) participated. On the basis of the sessions, a list of requirements, a final intervention design, and an evaluation of the co-design process and tasks were yielded.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The final list of requirements included intervention content (eg, major topics of compassionate mind training such as psychoeducation about 3 emotion systems and main issues that people with cancer encounter after diagnosis such as regulating information consumption), navigation, visual design, implementation strategies, and persuasive elements. The final intervention, Compas-Y, is a mobile self-compassion training comprising 6 training modules and several supportive functionalities such as a mood tracker and persuasive elements such as push notifications. The 4 co-design tasks helped overcome challenges in the development process such as dealing with conflicting top-down and bottom-up requirements and enabled the integration of all main requirements into the design.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
This study addressed the necessary integration of top-down and bottom-up requirements into eHealth development by examining a preliminary model of 4 co-design tasks. Broader considerations regarding the design of a mobile intervention based on traditional intervention formats and merging the scientific disciplines of psychology and design research are discussed.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35916691
pii: v8i3e37502
doi: 10.2196/37502
pmc: PMC9379787
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e37502Informations de copyright
©Judith Austin, Constance H C Drossaert, Jelle van Dijk, Robbert Sanderman, Elin Børøsund, Jelena Mirkovic, Marijke Schotanus-Dijkstra, Nienke J Peeters, Jan-Willem J R Van 't Klooster, Maya J Schroevers, Ernst T Bohlmeijer. Originally published in JMIR Cancer (https://cancer.jmir.org), 01.08.2022.
Références
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jan 27;24(1):e31858
pubmed: 35084359
Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):1016-25
pubmed: 21608075
Psychooncology. 2013 Aug;22(8):1872-9
pubmed: 23203842
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2018 Feb;86(2):101-115
pubmed: 29265836
Behav Ther. 2020 Jul;51(4):646-658
pubmed: 32586436
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 05;13(4):e111
pubmed: 22155738
J Behav Med. 2005 Aug;28(4):313-23
pubmed: 16049635
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Aug;13(8):1012-39
pubmed: 26285247
Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2020 Mar;14(1):27-39
pubmed: 31895066
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 16;22(11):e20709
pubmed: 33196452
Psychooncology. 2001 Jan-Feb;10(1):19-28
pubmed: 11180574
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Jun;27(6):2007-2021
pubmed: 30937599
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Jan 05;19(1):e10
pubmed: 28057609
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 29;23(4):e26939
pubmed: 33913811
Psychol Health. 2021 Jan;36(1):16-42
pubmed: 32116052
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 13;12:737725
pubmed: 34721209
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2018 Jul-Aug;36(4):520-528
pubmed: 29533162
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jul;24(4):965-986
pubmed: 27925335
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Jun;90(2):156-176
pubmed: 27743461
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 28;(5):CD008729
pubmed: 26017383
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 15;8(7):e17552
pubmed: 32673271
JMIR Form Res. 2018 Sep 06;2(2):e19
pubmed: 30684438
Cogn Behav Pract. 2015 Aug 1;22(3):281-290
pubmed: 26213458
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
pubmed: 23151820
Int J Med Inform. 2018 Feb;110:1-9
pubmed: 29331247
Health Expect. 2000 Dec;3(4):243-252
pubmed: 11281935
J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):635-42
pubmed: 16446335
Behav Res Ther. 2015 Sep;72:72-80
pubmed: 26196078
Behav Res Ther. 2021 Dec;147:103990
pubmed: 34715396
HERD. 2011 Summer;4(4):12-33
pubmed: 21960190
Patient Educ Couns. 2015 Mar;98(3):283-95
pubmed: 25535016
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061
pubmed: 34593508
Psychooncology. 2019 Dec;28(12):2257-2269
pubmed: 31464026
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Oct;25(5):545-63
pubmed: 9768376
J Cancer Surviv. 2019 Feb;13(1):97-107
pubmed: 30635865
Psychooncology. 2018 Sep;27(9):2063-2076
pubmed: 29885258
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jul 19;8(7):e28168
pubmed: 34279240
Psychol Psychother. 2017 Sep;90(3):432-455
pubmed: 27664071
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Mar 10;5(3):e18325
pubmed: 33688833
Front Public Health. 2017 Mar 08;5:40
pubmed: 28337432