A Retrospective Analysis of Serum D-Dimer Levels for the Exclusion of Acute Aortic Dissection.
aorta
d-dimer
diagnosis
dissection
Journal
Open access emergency medicine : OAEM
ISSN: 1179-1500
Titre abrégé: Open Access Emerg Med
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101570796
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
11
05
2022
accepted:
18
07
2022
entrez:
4
8
2022
pubmed:
5
8
2022
medline:
5
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is a highly fatal disorder if not promptly diagnosed. Some international studies have suggested that serum d-dimer levels may be used to exclude AAD, but data are limited. We sought to confirm that d-dimer levels are elevated in American patients with AAD. Additionally, we sought to estimate the test characteristics of the d-dimer for AAD. We performed a retrospective analysis of patients in the Hospital Corporation of America database who arrived at the hospital between 2015 and 2019. We queried the database to find patients who had a diagnosis of AAD or (nonspecific) chest pain, and who also had a d-dimer performed within 24 hours of arrival at the hospital. The median d-dimer was compared in those diagnosed with AAD versus chest pain. We estimated the test characteristics of d-dimer for AAD at the standard cutoff value of 500 ng/mL. In total, 48,902 patients met the criteria for analysis, including 572 with AAD and 48,330 with chest pain. The median d-dimers were 2455 ng/mL and 385 ng/mL for the AAD and chest pain groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). Using a cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the sensitivity of the d-dimer was 91.1% and the specificity was 71.4%. Serum d-dimer values are higher in patients with AAD than in those with nonspecific chest pain. At the standard cutoff of 500 ng/mL, the serum d-dimer has a high sensitivity for AAD, but not high enough that d-dimer levels alone can be used in isolation to exclude AAD.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35924032
doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S373335
pii: 373335
pmc: PMC9342875
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
367-373Informations de copyright
© 2022 Zitek et al.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Références
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Nov 15;122(2):170-2
pubmed: 17234284
J Emerg Med. 2008 May;34(4):367-76
pubmed: 18207693
Chest. 2000 May;117(5):1271-8
pubmed: 10807810
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Nov 27;16(1):343
pubmed: 34838062
Circ J. 2005 Apr;69(4):397-403
pubmed: 15791032
Chest. 2003 May;123(5):1375-8
pubmed: 12740250
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Oct;66(4):368-78
pubmed: 25805111
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Oct;9(3_suppl):S32-S39
pubmed: 31970996
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2009 Feb;10(2):212-4
pubmed: 19377387
Int J Cardiol. 2014 Jul 15;175(1):78-82
pubmed: 24838058
Circulation. 2009 May 26;119(20):2702-7
pubmed: 19433758
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2017 Aug;6(5):371-378
pubmed: 26185259
Am J Cardiol. 2011 Apr 15;107(8):1227-34
pubmed: 21296332
Circulation. 2010 Apr 6;121(13):e266-369
pubmed: 20233780
Crit Care Med. 2006 May;34(5):1358-64
pubmed: 16557157
Tex Heart Inst J. 2011;38(6):694-700
pubmed: 22199439
Intern Med J. 2007 Sep;37(9):607-13
pubmed: 17543005
Swiss Med Wkly. 2007 Aug 11;137(31-32):462
pubmed: 17705111
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000 Nov;55(11):M649-57
pubmed: 11078094
Eur Heart J. 2007 Dec;28(24):3067-75
pubmed: 17986466
Circ J. 2005 Jun;69(6):677-82
pubmed: 15914945
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014 Dec;3(4):373-81
pubmed: 24604712
Circulation. 2018 Jan 16;137(3):250-258
pubmed: 29030346
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;16(5):629-31
pubmed: 26587083
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 Aug 18;44(4):804-9
pubmed: 15312863
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Dec 14;169(22):2078-86
pubmed: 20008690
Sci Rep. 2016 May 27;6:26893
pubmed: 27230962
Clin Lab Haematol. 1990;12(1):37-42
pubmed: 2188775