Quantitative microbial population study reveals geographical differences in bacterial symbionts of Ixodes ricinus.
Low-biomass samples
Quantitative microbiome analysis
Spotted fever rickettsiosis
Tick-borne disease
Transmission dynamics
Journal
Microbiome
ISSN: 2049-2618
Titre abrégé: Microbiome
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101615147
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 08 2022
04 08 2022
Historique:
received:
14
07
2021
accepted:
20
04
2022
entrez:
4
8
2022
pubmed:
5
8
2022
medline:
9
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Ixodes ricinus ticks vector pathogens that cause serious health concerns. Like in other arthropods, the microbiome may affect the tick's biology, with consequences for pathogen transmission. Here, we explored the bacterial communities of I. ricinus across its developmental stages and six geographic locations by the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, combined with quantification of the bacterial load. A wide range of bacterial loads was found. Accurate quantification of low microbial biomass samples permitted comparisons to high biomass samples, despite the presence of contaminating DNA. The bacterial communities of ticks were associated with geographical location rather than life stage, and differences in Rickettsia abundance determined this association. Subsequently, we explored the geographical distribution of four vertically transmitted symbionts identified in the microbiome analysis. For that, we screened 16,555 nymphs from 19 forest sites for R. helvetica, Rickettsiella spp., Midichloria mitochondrii, and Spiroplasma ixodetis. Also, the infection rates and distributions of these symbionts were compared to the horizontally transmitted pathogens Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Neoehrlichia mikurensis. The infection rates of all vertically transmitted symbionts differed between the study sites, and none of the symbionts was present in all tested ticks suggesting a facultative association with I. ricinus. The proportions in which symbionts occurred in populations of I. ricinus were highly variable, but geographically close study sites expressed similar proportions. These patterns were in contrast to what we observed for horizontally transmitted pathogens. Lastly, nearly 12% of tested nymphs were free of any targeted microorganisms, which is in line with the microbiome analyses. Our results show that the microbiome of I. ricinus is highly variable, but changes gradually and ticks originating from geographically close forest sites express similar bacterial communities. This suggests that geography-related factors affect the infection rates of vertically transmitted symbionts in I. ricinus. Since some symbionts, such as R. helvetica can cause disease in humans, we propose that public health investigations consider geographical differences in its infection rates.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Ixodes ricinus ticks vector pathogens that cause serious health concerns. Like in other arthropods, the microbiome may affect the tick's biology, with consequences for pathogen transmission. Here, we explored the bacterial communities of I. ricinus across its developmental stages and six geographic locations by the 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing, combined with quantification of the bacterial load.
RESULTS
A wide range of bacterial loads was found. Accurate quantification of low microbial biomass samples permitted comparisons to high biomass samples, despite the presence of contaminating DNA. The bacterial communities of ticks were associated with geographical location rather than life stage, and differences in Rickettsia abundance determined this association. Subsequently, we explored the geographical distribution of four vertically transmitted symbionts identified in the microbiome analysis. For that, we screened 16,555 nymphs from 19 forest sites for R. helvetica, Rickettsiella spp., Midichloria mitochondrii, and Spiroplasma ixodetis. Also, the infection rates and distributions of these symbionts were compared to the horizontally transmitted pathogens Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Neoehrlichia mikurensis. The infection rates of all vertically transmitted symbionts differed between the study sites, and none of the symbionts was present in all tested ticks suggesting a facultative association with I. ricinus. The proportions in which symbionts occurred in populations of I. ricinus were highly variable, but geographically close study sites expressed similar proportions. These patterns were in contrast to what we observed for horizontally transmitted pathogens. Lastly, nearly 12% of tested nymphs were free of any targeted microorganisms, which is in line with the microbiome analyses.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results show that the microbiome of I. ricinus is highly variable, but changes gradually and ticks originating from geographically close forest sites express similar bacterial communities. This suggests that geography-related factors affect the infection rates of vertically transmitted symbionts in I. ricinus. Since some symbionts, such as R. helvetica can cause disease in humans, we propose that public health investigations consider geographical differences in its infection rates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35927748
doi: 10.1186/s40168-022-01276-1
pii: 10.1186/s40168-022-01276-1
pmc: PMC9351266
doi:
Substances chimiques
RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
120Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998 Feb;17(2):95-100
pubmed: 9629973
PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e30692
pubmed: 22292021
Pathogens. 2020 Apr 30;9(5):
pubmed: 32365910
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):e0227285
pubmed: 31940382
G3 (Bethesda). 2014 Sep 11;4(11):2189-95
pubmed: 25213693
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012 Jun;78(12):4110-6
pubmed: 22467507
PeerJ. 2019 Dec 19;7:e8217
pubmed: 31875152
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 Jan 23;7(3):831-8
pubmed: 25618142
Curr Biol. 2018 Jun 18;28(12):1896-1902.e5
pubmed: 29861133
Parasit Vectors. 2015 Jun 25;8:345
pubmed: 26108374
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 7;273(1588):805-14
pubmed: 16618673
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32942
pubmed: 22412957
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 09;10(12):e0144552
pubmed: 26650541
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Oct;5(6):864-70
pubmed: 25150725
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Feb 7;275(1632):293-9
pubmed: 18029301
Trends Parasitol. 2021 Aug;37(8):722-733
pubmed: 33962878
ISME J. 2017 Mar;11(3):813-816
pubmed: 27858931
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2014 Apr;5(3):245-51
pubmed: 24582511
Cell Host Microbe. 2014 Jan 15;15(1):58-71
pubmed: 24439898
ISME J. 2016 Aug;10(8):1846-55
pubmed: 26882265
Parasit Vectors. 2017 Sep 19;10(1):433
pubmed: 28927432
PLoS One. 2011;6(10):e25604
pubmed: 22022422
J Clin Microbiol. 2004 Jul;42(7):3164-8
pubmed: 15243077
Environ Microbiol. 2013 Feb;15(2):663-73
pubmed: 23279105
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2006 Nov;56(Pt 11):2535-2540
pubmed: 17082386
J Med Entomol. 2008 Mar;45(2):289-97
pubmed: 18402145
Mol Ecol. 2016 Oct;25(19):4963-77
pubmed: 27588381
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 25;11(1):17148
pubmed: 34433845
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Jan 4;11(1):12
pubmed: 29301588
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 May 1;366(10):
pubmed: 31132110
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2019 Jun;10(4):894-900
pubmed: 31023629
Mol Ecol. 2017 Jun;26(11):2905-2921
pubmed: 28281305
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1803-7
pubmed: 12563031
Nat Genet. 2002 Nov;32(3):402-7
pubmed: 12219091
Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1995 Jan;45(1):23-8
pubmed: 7857803
Genome Biol Evol. 2015 May 28;7(6):1779-96
pubmed: 26025560
FASEB J. 2019 Oct;33(10):11235-11246
pubmed: 31299175
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Jan 12;107(2):769-74
pubmed: 20080750
Microbiome. 2021 Jul 3;9(1):153
pubmed: 34217365
Parasit Vectors. 2016 Mar 10;9:140
pubmed: 26965746
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 28;6(2):e17035
pubmed: 21386965
Int J Med Microbiol. 2006 May;296 Suppl 40:157-61
pubmed: 16524780
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2010 Jan;8(1):33-50
pubmed: 20014900
Curr Biol. 2016 Jan 25;26(2):207-211
pubmed: 26748854
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020 May 08;10:211
pubmed: 32457850
Parasit Vectors. 2012 Apr 19;5:74
pubmed: 22515314
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2013 Jul 22;3:31
pubmed: 23885337
Parasit Vectors. 2009 Sep 04;2(1):41
pubmed: 19732416
Parasit Vectors. 2019 Sep 6;12(1):434
pubmed: 31492171
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 7;273(1586):603-10
pubmed: 16537132
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015 Sep;81(18):6200-9
pubmed: 26150449
Trends Parasitol. 2015 Jul;31(7):315-23
pubmed: 25936226
Parasit Vectors. 2018 Mar 6;11(1):145
pubmed: 29510749
Parasitology. 2003 Jan;126(Pt 1):11-20
pubmed: 12613759
Nature. 2017 Nov 23;551(7681):507-511
pubmed: 29143816
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jul 15;111(28):10257-62
pubmed: 24982177
Trends Microbiol. 2019 Feb;27(2):105-117
pubmed: 30497919
Mol Ecol. 2017 Dec;26(23):6578-6589
pubmed: 29178531
Annu Rev Entomol. 1991;36:659-81
pubmed: 2006871
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2017 Jun 08;7:236
pubmed: 28642842
ISME J. 2018 Nov;12(11):2596-2607
pubmed: 29946195
Parasit Vectors. 2020 Jan 20;13(1):34
pubmed: 31959217