Low-intensity Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for the Management of Postprostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Erectile dysfunction Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy Radical prostatectomy

Journal

European urology open science
ISSN: 2666-1683
Titre abrégé: Eur Urol Open Sci
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101771568

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
accepted: 07 07 2022
entrez: 5 8 2022
pubmed: 6 8 2022
medline: 6 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Erectile dysfunction (ED) following radical prostatectomy is a concern for patients and their partners. Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) can potentially enhance tissue repair and regeneration. The aim of the current study was to systematically review the literature to assess the role of LI-ESWT in the management of patients with postprostatectomy ED. Two authors independently performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Web of Science databases to identify all relevant articles. Non-English reports, case reports, reviews, letters, and editorials were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed according to the GRADE guidelines. Nine articles met the inclusion criteria and were included in the qualitative analysis. All the studies included were published between 2015 and 2022 and the majority of them compared phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5Is) alone versus a combination of LI-ESWT and PDE5Is. Only three studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). In general, there is no standardized protocol for LI-ESWT for postprostatectomy ED. In comparisons of LI-ESWT + PDE5Is versus PDE5Is alone, some authors found a statistically significant improvement in erectile function with LI-ESWT + PDE5Is. The starting time for LI-ESWT differed among the studies, ranging from 3 d to 6 mo after surgery. The main limitations of the review are the scarcity of studies, small sample sizes, high risk of bias, and high heterogeneity among studies. There is currently limited evidence on the use of LI-ESWT either alone or in combination with PDE5Is in penile rehabilitation protocols after prostatectomy. However, small clinical trials with short follow-up show that LI-ESWT could potentially play a role in the management of postprostatectomy ED in the future. Further RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed. Despite limited reports in the literature, low-intensity shockwave therapy after removal of the prostate is a promising noninvasive treatment for dealing with erectile dysfunction after surgery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35928730
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.07.003
pii: S2666-1683(22)00735-2
pmc: PMC9344341
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

45-53

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors.

Références

BJU Int. 2015 Apr;115 Suppl 5:46-9
pubmed: 25828173
J Sex Med. 2016 Jan;13(1):22-32
pubmed: 26755082
J Sex Med. 2008 Mar;5(3):693-704
pubmed: 18194174
Transl Androl Urol. 2020 Aug;9(4):1559-1565
pubmed: 32944518
Prostate. 1983;4(5):473-85
pubmed: 6889192
Int J Impot Res. 2018 Feb;30(1):1-7
pubmed: 29180799
Eur Urol. 2009 Feb;55(2):334-47
pubmed: 18986755
Sex Med. 2021 Jun;9(3):100338
pubmed: 33789173
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
J Urol. 2021 Apr;205(4):1018-1030
pubmed: 33443457
Sex Med Rev. 2021 Jan;9(1):93-122
pubmed: 32499189
Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Nov;50(11):2007-2014
pubmed: 30232721
Int J Impot Res. 2022 Mar 28;:
pubmed: 35347300
Int J Impot Res. 2020 Sep;32(5):495-502
pubmed: 31836862
Scand J Urol. 2016;50(2):123-7
pubmed: 26493542
J Sex Med. 2020 Apr;17(4):688-694
pubmed: 32007430
Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14804
pubmed: 34487369

Auteurs

Maria Chiara Sighinolfi (MC)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Ahmed Eissa (A)

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Carlo Bellorofonte (C)

Urology Unit, Columbus Clinic Center, Milan, Italy.

Alessandro Mofferdin (A)

Urology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Mosaab Eldeeb (M)

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Simone Assumma (S)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Urology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Enrico Panio (E)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Urology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Tommaso Calcagnile (T)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Urology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Daniele Stroppa (D)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Giorgio Bozzini (G)

Urology Department, ASST Lariana, Como, Italy.

Giorgia Gaia (G)

Gynecology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.

Stefano Terzoni (S)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Mattia Sangalli (M)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Salvatore Micali (S)

Urology Department, University of Modena & Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy.

Bernardo Rocco (B)

Urology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH