Clinical assessment of scannographic markers for sarcopenia in lung transplant candidates.
Lung transplant
Recipient selection
Sarcopenia
Tomodensitometry
Journal
Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 1532-3064
Titre abrégé: Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8908438
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
received:
18
02
2022
revised:
22
06
2022
accepted:
30
06
2022
pubmed:
6
8
2022
medline:
14
9
2022
entrez:
5
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The selection of patients for lung transplantation is difficult. An aspect of the patient's general condition and frailty can be assessed by measuring the surface area of certain muscles on CT. Indeed, sarcopenia, assessed by measuring the area of psoas muscles on scannographic sections has already been shown to be associated with poor outcomes in lung transplant and other major surgeries and could thus be helpful to evaluate candidates to lung transplant. However, it is not routinely performed by radiologists. As a pilot study, we compared the reliability of computerized tomography scan assessment for sarcopenia by clinicians with that of radiologists. We conducted a retrospective single-centre study in which preoperative abdominal CT scans of lung transplant patients from 2014 to 2018 were analysed to assess sarcopenia by measuring the surface areas (mm We performed a double reading of 200 scans. The clinicians 'measurements were comparable to those of the radiologists for the psoas and paraspinal muscles but not for the diaphragm pillars. CT measurement of psoas and paraspinal muscle areas by clinicians appears reliable and feasible in routine practice and could be used in the evaluation of lung transplant candidates.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35930917
pii: S0954-6111(22)00191-3
doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106926
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
106926Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.