Applicability and usefulness of the Declaration of Helsinki for forensic research with human cadavers and remains.
Cadaver
Ethics
Forensic anthropology
Forensic medicine
Legal medicine
Risk assessment
Journal
Forensic science, medicine, and pathology
ISSN: 1556-2891
Titre abrégé: Forensic Sci Med Pathol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101236111
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 2023
03 2023
Historique:
accepted:
18
07
2022
pubmed:
7
8
2022
medline:
17
3
2023
entrez:
6
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Bodies of deceased persons and human remains and their specimens (i.e., organs, bones, tissues, or biological samples) are essential in forensic research but ad hoc worldwide-recognized ethical standards for their use are still lacking. Such standards are needed both to avoid possible unethical practices and to sustain research in the forensic field. Pending consensus within the forensic science community regarding this topic, with this article we aim to stimulate a debate as to the applicability and usefulness of the Declaration of Helsinki in the field of forensic research involving human cadavers and remains. Considering the fundamental differences compared to clinical research involving human beings and the different moral obligations involved, we focus on the risks, burdens, and benefits of research, ethics committee approval, and informed consent requirements. The Declaration of Helsinki framework allows forensic researchers to focus on substantial ethical principles promoting the consistency, integrity, and quality of research. Consensus regarding ethical standards and the adoption of national and supranational laws that clearly regulate the use of human cadavers and remains, including those from autopsies, continues to be of primary importance for the forensic science community.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35932421
doi: 10.1007/s12024-022-00510-4
pii: 10.1007/s12024-022-00510-4
pmc: PMC9362629
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1-7Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Tsujimura-Ito T, Inoue Y, Muto K, Yoshida KI. The use of human samples obtained during medicolegal autopsies in research: an introduction to current conditions and initiatives in Japan. Med Sci Law. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025802417704107 .
doi: 10.1177/0025802417704107
pubmed: 28391742
Roberts LW, Nolte KB, Warner TD, McCarty T, Rosenbaum LS, Zumwalt R. Perceptions of the ethical acceptability of using medical examiner autopsies for research and education: a survey of forensic pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2000. https://doi.org/10.5858/2000-124-1485-POTEAO .
doi: 10.5858/2000-124-1485-POTEAO
pubmed: 11035581
Elger BS, Hofner MC, Mangin P. Research involving biological material from forensic autopsies: legal and ethical issues. Pathobiology. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1159/000178150 .
doi: 10.1159/000178150
pubmed: 19188745
Hostiuc S. Forensic autopsy. The particularities of consent for research. J Health Ethics. 2015. https://doi.org/10.18785/ojhe.1101.08 .
doi: 10.18785/ojhe.1101.08
Rougé-Maillart C, Dupont V, Jousset N. The problem with medical research on tissue and organ samples taken in connection with forensic autopsies in France. J Forensic Leg Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.002 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2015.11.002
pubmed: 26694871
Márquez-Grant N, Passalacqua NV, Pilloud MA, Lester N, Decker S, Ford J. Ethical Concerns in Forensic Anthropology. In: Squires K, Errickson D, Márquez-Grant N, editors. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. A Global Challenge in Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2019. pp. 347–66.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_15
Shade J, Coon H, Docherty AR. Ethical implications of using biobanks and population databases for genetic suicide research. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.b.32718 .
doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32718
pubmed: 30779308
pmcid: 6717044
Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Speaking for the dead. The human body in biology and medicine. 2nd ed. Abingdon-New York: Routledge; 2016.
doi: 10.4324/9781315610306
Schwarz CS, Münch N, Müller-Salo J, Kramer S, Walz C, Germerott T. The dignity of the human corpse in forensic medicine. Int J Legal Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02534-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02534-x
pubmed: 33709210
pmcid: 8354905
Jones DS, Grady C, Lederer SE. “Ethics and Clinical Research”--The 50th Anniversary of Beecher’s Bombshell. N Engl J Med. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMms1603756 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMms1603756
pubmed: 27959717
pmcid: 5134995
Ghosh SK. The practice of ethics in the context of human dissection: setting standards for future physicians. Ann Anat. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151577 .
doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2020.151577
pubmed: 32688021
pmcid: 7366954
Pentz RD, Cohen CB, Wicclair M, DeVita MA, Flamm AL, Youngner SJ, Hamric AB, McCabe MS, Glover JJ, Kittiko WJ, Kinlaw K, Keller J, Asch A, Kavanagh JJ, Arap W. Ethics guidelines for research with the recently dead. Nat Med. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm1105-1145 .
doi: 10.1038/nm1105-1145
pubmed: 16270065
Nolte KB. Research issues in forensic pathology: a survey of academic institutions employing forensic pathologists. Hum Pathol. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2004.01.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.01.010
pubmed: 15138925
World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki-Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013. www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects/ . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use, and repealing Directive 2001/20/EC. 2014. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32014R0536 . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
McGuire AL, Majumder MA, Halpern SD, Swindell JS, Yaeger LV, Gibbs RA, Wheeler TM. Taking DNA from the dead. Nat Rev Genet. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2792 .
doi: 10.1038/nrg2792
pubmed: 20332774
pmcid: 4065415
Bach MC. Still human: a call for increased focus on ethical standards in cadaver research. HEC Forum. 2016. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-016-9309-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s10730-016-9309-9
pubmed: 27522584
Bhutta ZA. Ethics in international health research: a perspective from the developing world. Bull World Health Organ. 2002;114–120.
Hutchinson EF, Kramer B, Billings BK, Brits DM, Pather N. The law, ethics and body donation: a tale of two bequeathal programs. Anat Sci Educ. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1922 .
doi: 10.1002/ase.1922
pubmed: 31596033
Lynch A. Respect for the dead human body: a question of body, mind, spirit, psyche. Transplant Proc. 1990;22:1016–1018.
Mcguinness S, Brazier M. Respecting the living means respecting the dead too. Oxf J Legal Stud. 2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqn005 .
doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqn005
Walker PL. Bioarchaeological ethics: a historical perspective on the value of human remains. In: Katzenberg MA, Saunders SR, editors. Biological anthropology of the human skeleton. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2000. pp. 1–39.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council. Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans. 2018. https://ethics.gc.ca/eng/documents/tcps2-2018-en-interactive-final.pdf . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Mohammed M, Kharoshah MA. Autopsy in Islam and current practice in Arab Muslim countries. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.02.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2014.02.005
pubmed: 24661712
Radu CC, Rebeleanu C, Ureche D, Scripcaru C. Forensic, ethical and religious issues regarding the cremation process. Rom J Leg Med. 2017;25:432–4.
Jenkins T. Contesting human remains in museum collections: the crisis of cultural authority. New York: Routledge; 2010.
doi: 10.4324/9780203841310
Caenazzo L, Tozzo P, Dierickx K. Incidental findings in forensics: are we sure that it is a question easy to deal with? Int J Legal Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-020-02427-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02427-5
pubmed: 33772344
Sperhake JP. Autopsies of COVID-19 deceased? Absolutely! Leg Med. (Tokyo) 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2020.101769 .
Loibner M, Langner C, Regitnig P, Gorkiewicz G, Zatloukal K. Biosafety requirements for autopsies of patients with COVID-19: example of a BSL-3 autopsy facility designed for highly pathogenic agents. Pathobiology. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1159/000513438 .
doi: 10.1159/000513438
pubmed: 33296902
Burton JL. A bite into the history of the autopsy: from ancient roots to modern decay. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2005. https://doi.org/10.1385/FSMP:1:4:277 .
Aydin B, Tanyel E, Colak B, Fisgin N, Tulek N. Infection control implementations at forensic medicine practice: a national survey in Turkey. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e31818754d0 .
doi: 10.1097/PAF.0b013e31818754d0
pubmed: 19465809
Ebert LC, Franckenberg S, Sieberth T, Schweitzer W, Thali M, Ford J, Decker S. A review of visualization techniques of post-mortem computed tomography data for forensic death investigations. Int J Legal Med. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-021-02581-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02581-4
pubmed: 33931808
pmcid: 8354982
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Human tissue ethical and legal issues. https://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/assets/pdfs/NCOB_response_-_HT_bill.pdf . 2004. Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Byard RW. Preventive pathology revisited. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-014-9534-y .
doi: 10.1007/s12024-014-9534-y
pubmed: 25332174
Sessa F, Bertozzi G, Cipolloni L, Baldari B, Cantatore S, D’Errico S, Di Mizio G, Asmundo A, Castorina S, Salerno M, Pomara C. Clinical-forensic autopsy findings to defeat COVID-19 disease: a literature review. J Clin Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9072026 .
doi: 10.3390/jcm9072026
pubmed: 33081283
pmcid: 7602946
Williams A, Cassella JP, Pringle JK. The ethical considerations for creating a human taphonomy facility in the United Kingdom. In: Squires K, Errickson D, Márquez-Grant N, editors. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. A Global Challenge in Bioarchaeology and Forensic Anthropology. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland; 2019. pp. 367–84.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32926-6_16
Forbes S. Body farms. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2017. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-017-9924-z .
doi: 10.1007/s12024-017-9924-z
pubmed: 28944444
Bytheway J, Connor M, Dabbs GR, Johnston CA, Sunkel M. The ethics and best practices of Human Decomposition Facilities in the United States. Forensic Sci Policy Manag Int J. 2015;6:59–68.
doi: 10.1080/19409044.2015.1064190
Legge 10 febbraio 2020, n. 10. Norme in materia di disposizione del proprio corpo e dei tessuti post mortem a fini di studio, di formazione e di ricerca scientifica. 2020. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2020/03/04/20G00024/sg . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Van Assche K, Capitaine L, Pennings G, Sterckx S. Governing the postmortem procurement of human body material for research. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2015.0000 .
doi: 10.1353/ken.2015.0000
pubmed: 25843120
Sellevold BJ. Ancient skeletons and ethical dilemmas. In: Fossheim H, editor. More than just bones: ethics and research on human remains. Oslo: The Norwegian National Research Committee; 2012. pp. 139–61.
Champney TH. A proposal for a policy on the ethical care and use of cadavers and their tissues. Anat Sci Educ. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.199 .
doi: 10.1002/ase.199
pubmed: 21265038
Richardson R, Hurwitz B. Donors’ attitudes towards body donation for dissection. Lancet. 1995. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92166-4 .
doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92166-4
pubmed: 7475841
Sehirli US, Saka E, Sarikaya O. Attitudes of Turkish anatomists toward cadaver donation. Clin Anat. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20056 .
doi: 10.1002/ca.20056
pubmed: 15495167
Bolt S, Eisinga R, Venbrux E, Kuks JB, Gerrits PO. Personality and motivation for body donation. Ann Anat. 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2011.01.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.01.005
pubmed: 21330124
English V, Sommerville A. Presumed consent for transplantation: a dead issue after Alder Hey? J Med Ethics. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.29.3.147 .
doi: 10.1136/jme.29.3.147
pubmed: 12796433
pmcid: 1733765
Chung CS, Lehmann LS. Informed consent and the process of cadaver donation. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2002. https://doi.org/10.5858/2002-126-0964-ICATPO .
doi: 10.5858/2002-126-0964-ICATPO
pubmed: 12171497
Riederer BM, Bolt S, Brenner E, Bueno-López JL, Circulescu ARM, Davies DC, De Caro R, Gerritis PO, McHanwell S, Pais D, Paulsen F, Plaisant O, Sendemir E, Stabile I, Moxham BJ. The legal and ethical framework governing Body Donation in Europe-1st update on current practice. Eur J Anat. 2012;16:1–21.
Human Tissue Act. Chapter 30. 2004. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/30/pdfs/ukpga_20040030_en.pdf . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.
Council of Europe. Recommendation CM/Rec(2016)6 of the Committee of Ministers to member States on research on biological materials of human origin. 2016. https://search.coe.int/cm/Pages/result_details.aspx?ObjectId=090000168064e8ff . Accessed 28 Feb 2022.