A case study to investigate the impact of overcrowding indices in emergency departments.
ED evaluation indices
Emergency department work index (EDWIN)
National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS)
Overcrowding in emergency department (ED)
Journal
BMC emergency medicine
ISSN: 1471-227X
Titre abrégé: BMC Emerg Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968543
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2022
09 08 2022
Historique:
received:
02
12
2021
accepted:
01
08
2022
entrez:
9
8
2022
pubmed:
10
8
2022
medline:
12
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is widespread in hospitals in many countries, causing severe consequences to patient outcomes, staff work and the system, with an overall increase in costs. Therefore, health managers are constantly looking for new preventive and corrective measures to counter this phenomenon. To do this, however, it is necessary to be able to characterize the problem objectively. For this reason, various indices are used in the literature to assess ED crowding. In this work, we explore the use of two of the most widespread crowding indices in an ED of an Italian national hospital, investigate their relationships and discuss their effectiveness. In this study, two of the most widely used indices in the literature, the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) and the Emergency Department Working Index (EDWIN), were analysed to characterize overcrowding in the ED of A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli" of Naples, which included 1678 clinical cases. The measurement was taken every 15 minutes for a period of 7 days. The results showed consistency in the use of EDWIN and NEDOCS indices as measures of overcrowding, especially in severe overcrowding conditions. Indeed, in the examined case study, both EDWIN and NEDOCS showed very low rates of occurrence of severe overcrowding (2-3%). In contrast, regarding differences in the estimation of busy to overcrowded ED rates, the EDWIN index proved to be less sensitive in distinguishing these variations in the occupancy of the ED. Furthermore, within the target week considered in the study, the results show that, according to both EDWIN and NEDOCS, higher overcrowding rates occurred during the middle week rather than during the weekend. Finally, a low degree of correlation between the two indices was found. The effectiveness of both EDWIN and NEDOCS in measuring ED crowding and overcrowding was investigated, and the main differences and relationships in the use of the indices are highlighted. While both indices are useful ED performance metrics, they are not always interchangeable, and their combined use could provide more details in understanding ED dynamics and possibly predicting future critical conditions, thus enhancing ED management.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Emergency department (ED) overcrowding is widespread in hospitals in many countries, causing severe consequences to patient outcomes, staff work and the system, with an overall increase in costs. Therefore, health managers are constantly looking for new preventive and corrective measures to counter this phenomenon. To do this, however, it is necessary to be able to characterize the problem objectively. For this reason, various indices are used in the literature to assess ED crowding. In this work, we explore the use of two of the most widespread crowding indices in an ED of an Italian national hospital, investigate their relationships and discuss their effectiveness.
METHODS
In this study, two of the most widely used indices in the literature, the National Emergency Department Overcrowding Scale (NEDOCS) and the Emergency Department Working Index (EDWIN), were analysed to characterize overcrowding in the ED of A.O.R.N. "A. Cardarelli" of Naples, which included 1678 clinical cases. The measurement was taken every 15 minutes for a period of 7 days.
RESULTS
The results showed consistency in the use of EDWIN and NEDOCS indices as measures of overcrowding, especially in severe overcrowding conditions. Indeed, in the examined case study, both EDWIN and NEDOCS showed very low rates of occurrence of severe overcrowding (2-3%). In contrast, regarding differences in the estimation of busy to overcrowded ED rates, the EDWIN index proved to be less sensitive in distinguishing these variations in the occupancy of the ED. Furthermore, within the target week considered in the study, the results show that, according to both EDWIN and NEDOCS, higher overcrowding rates occurred during the middle week rather than during the weekend. Finally, a low degree of correlation between the two indices was found.
CONCLUSIONS
The effectiveness of both EDWIN and NEDOCS in measuring ED crowding and overcrowding was investigated, and the main differences and relationships in the use of the indices are highlighted. While both indices are useful ED performance metrics, they are not always interchangeable, and their combined use could provide more details in understanding ED dynamics and possibly predicting future critical conditions, thus enhancing ED management.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35945503
doi: 10.1186/s12873-022-00703-8
pii: 10.1186/s12873-022-00703-8
pmc: PMC9360659
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
143Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Emerg Med Australas. 2010 Oct;22(5):391-8
pubmed: 20880296
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 3;18(1):914
pubmed: 30509286
West J Emerg Med. 2009 Nov;10(4):233-9
pubmed: 20046239
Intern Emerg Med. 2012 Apr;7(2):173-80
pubmed: 22009553
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 Sep;10(3):
pubmed: 34493488
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Jan;11(1):38-50
pubmed: 14709427
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 02;10(5):
pubmed: 35627977
West J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;14(1):11-5
pubmed: 23447751
Emerg Med Australas. 2010 Oct;22(5):368-73
pubmed: 21040479
Acad Emerg Med. 2021 Feb;28(2):184-196
pubmed: 33277724
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 30;13(8):e0203316
pubmed: 30161242
J Pers Med. 2022 Feb 14;12(2):
pubmed: 35207769
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 28;7(1):e52
pubmed: 31602435
Emerg Med J. 2020 Dec;37(12):801-806
pubmed: 32859732
Ann Emerg Med. 2017 Nov;70(5):632-639.e4
pubmed: 28688771
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 07;19(5):
pubmed: 35270808
Turk J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug 07;18(3):91-93
pubmed: 30191186
Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Jan;51(1):15-24, 24.e1-2
pubmed: 17980458
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Jul;139:104143
pubmed: 32330853
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Sep 13;21(18):
pubmed: 34577342
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Apr;73(4):345-355
pubmed: 30470514
Health Care Manag Sci. 2018 Mar;21(1):144-155
pubmed: 27704323
CJEM. 2022 Jan;24(1):23-26
pubmed: 33748940
Acta Biomed. 2015 Sep 14;86(2):170-5
pubmed: 26422432
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Jul 10;99(28):e20478
pubmed: 32664059