Sexual and reproductive health services during outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics in sub-Saharan Africa: a literature scoping review.
Access
Adolescents
COVID-19
Ebola
Epidemics
Family planning
Maternal health
Utilization
Young people
Journal
Systematic reviews
ISSN: 2046-4053
Titre abrégé: Syst Rev
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101580575
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 08 2022
09 08 2022
Historique:
received:
22
06
2021
accepted:
26
07
2022
entrez:
9
8
2022
pubmed:
10
8
2022
medline:
12
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic could worsen adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH). We sought evidence on the indirect impacts of previous infectious disease epidemics and the current COVID-19 pandemic on the uptake of ASRH in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to design relevant digital solutions. We undertook a literature scoping review to synthesize evidence on the indirect impacts of COVID-19 on ASRH in SSA per the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA reporting guidelines. We conducted the search on PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate in June and November 2020. We included all peer-reviewed, English-language primary studies on the indirect impacts of infectious disease epidemics on the uptake of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in SSA. We included 21 of 42 identified studies. Sixteen studies (76.2%) quantitatively assessed utilization and access to SRH during epidemics. Five studies (2 [9.6%] qualitative and 3 [14.3%] mixed methods) explored factors affecting SRH services. All studies focused on adult populations, most often on labor and delivery (n = 13 [61.9%]) and family planning (n = 8 [38.1%]) outcomes. Although we sought out to assess all outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics, the only relevant studies took place during the West African Ebola pandemic (n = 17 [80.9%]) and COVID-19 pandemic (n = 4 [19.0%]). One study (4.8%) highlighted adolescent-specific outcomes and condom use. Most studies found declined access to and utilization of facility delivery, antenatal care, family planning, and HIV care. One study noted an increase in adolescent pregnancies. However, other studies noted similar, or even increasing trends in access to and utilization of other SRH services (family planning visits; HIV diagnosis; ART initiation) during epidemics. Barriers to SRH uptake included factors such as a reduced ability to pay for care due to lost income, travel restrictions, and fear of infection. Supply-side barriers included lack of open facilities, workers, commodities, and services. Community-based peer delivery systems, telemedicine, and transport services improved SRH uptake. Access to SRH services during epidemics among adolescents and young people in SSA is understudied. We found that no studies focused on SRH outcomes of abortion, emergency contraception, sexually transmitted infections, or cervical cancer. To improve access to and utilization of SRH during pandemics, we recommend the following; in terms of research, key standardized SRH indicators should be included in routine data collection, routine data should be disaggregated by age, gender, and geography to understand gaps in ASRH service delivery, and additional rigorous epidemiological and social-behavioral studies should be conducted. On implementation, community-based peer delivery systems and telemedicine, internet-based, and other technological solutions may better reach adolescent and young people in SSA.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic could worsen adolescent sexual and reproductive health (ASRH). We sought evidence on the indirect impacts of previous infectious disease epidemics and the current COVID-19 pandemic on the uptake of ASRH in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) to design relevant digital solutions.
METHODS
We undertook a literature scoping review to synthesize evidence on the indirect impacts of COVID-19 on ASRH in SSA per the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA reporting guidelines. We conducted the search on PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and ResearchGate in June and November 2020. We included all peer-reviewed, English-language primary studies on the indirect impacts of infectious disease epidemics on the uptake of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) in SSA.
RESULTS
We included 21 of 42 identified studies. Sixteen studies (76.2%) quantitatively assessed utilization and access to SRH during epidemics. Five studies (2 [9.6%] qualitative and 3 [14.3%] mixed methods) explored factors affecting SRH services. All studies focused on adult populations, most often on labor and delivery (n = 13 [61.9%]) and family planning (n = 8 [38.1%]) outcomes. Although we sought out to assess all outbreaks, epidemics, and pandemics, the only relevant studies took place during the West African Ebola pandemic (n = 17 [80.9%]) and COVID-19 pandemic (n = 4 [19.0%]). One study (4.8%) highlighted adolescent-specific outcomes and condom use. Most studies found declined access to and utilization of facility delivery, antenatal care, family planning, and HIV care. One study noted an increase in adolescent pregnancies. However, other studies noted similar, or even increasing trends in access to and utilization of other SRH services (family planning visits; HIV diagnosis; ART initiation) during epidemics. Barriers to SRH uptake included factors such as a reduced ability to pay for care due to lost income, travel restrictions, and fear of infection. Supply-side barriers included lack of open facilities, workers, commodities, and services. Community-based peer delivery systems, telemedicine, and transport services improved SRH uptake.
CONCLUSION
Access to SRH services during epidemics among adolescents and young people in SSA is understudied. We found that no studies focused on SRH outcomes of abortion, emergency contraception, sexually transmitted infections, or cervical cancer. To improve access to and utilization of SRH during pandemics, we recommend the following; in terms of research, key standardized SRH indicators should be included in routine data collection, routine data should be disaggregated by age, gender, and geography to understand gaps in ASRH service delivery, and additional rigorous epidemiological and social-behavioral studies should be conducted. On implementation, community-based peer delivery systems and telemedicine, internet-based, and other technological solutions may better reach adolescent and young people in SSA.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35945580
doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-02035-x
pii: 10.1186/s13643-022-02035-x
pmc: PMC9361234
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
161Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Glob Public Health. 2020 Oct;15(10):1430-1442
pubmed: 32816628
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jan;56(1 Suppl):S22-41
pubmed: 25528977
Pan Afr Med J. 2015 Oct 11;22 Suppl 1:22
pubmed: 26740850
Trop Med Int Health. 2015 Apr;20(4):448-54
pubmed: 25565430
Implement Sci. 2010 Sep 20;5:69
pubmed: 20854677
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Jun;64(6):697-699
pubmed: 31122505
Reprod Health. 2020 Apr 23;17(1):59
pubmed: 32326943
Science. 2015 Mar 13;347(6227):1240-2
pubmed: 25766232
Stud Fam Plann. 2020 Mar;51(1):71-86
pubmed: 32180246
BMJ Glob Health. 2016 Oct 7;1(3):e000065
pubmed: 28588954
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Oct 12;15:254
pubmed: 26459295
Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Jan 1;111(1):22-29
pubmed: 28340207
AIDS. 2015 Sep 10;29(14):1883-7
pubmed: 26372393
PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296
pubmed: 17941714
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019 Dec 23;7(4):507-514
pubmed: 31874936
Lancet. 2016 Jun 11;387(10036):2423-78
pubmed: 27174304
AIDS. 2015 Nov;29(17):2347-51
pubmed: 26544705
Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(Suppl 1):S62-S69
pubmed: 28744441
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Jun 1;171(6):573-592
pubmed: 28384795
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;15(9):988-989
pubmed: 26116185
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Aug;5(8):
pubmed: 32819917
PLoS Med. 2016 Aug 02;13(8):e1002096
pubmed: 27482706
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):e029093
pubmed: 31488479
Lancet Infect Dis. 2015 Sep;15(9):1017-1023
pubmed: 26116183
Emerg Infect Dis. 2016 Jun;22(6):1106-8
pubmed: 27191621
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009 Jun;35(2):63-71
pubmed: 19620090
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;131 Suppl 1:S40-2
pubmed: 26433504
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Sep;8(9):e1132-e1141
pubmed: 32673577
Lancet. 2020 Apr 11;395(10231):1175-1177
pubmed: 32278371
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jul 4;18(1):521
pubmed: 29973258
J Public Health (Oxf). 2016 Dec 02;38(4):673-678
pubmed: 28158472
Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020 Jun 30;8(2):136-143
pubmed: 32522765
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Sep;97(3):931-936
pubmed: 28722621
Glob Public Health. 2015;10(2):189-221
pubmed: 25554828
J Glob Health. 2018 Dec;8(2):020601
pubmed: 30023054
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 24;11(2):e0150080
pubmed: 26910462
Public Health Action. 2017 Jun 21;7(Suppl 1):S70-S75
pubmed: 28744442
PLoS Curr. 2015 Aug 04;7:
pubmed: 26331094
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e043763
pubmed: 33020109
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020 Apr 16;46:73-76
pubmed: 32343244
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2020 Sep;103(3):1198-1200
pubmed: 32762799
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 Jul;17(7):796-807
pubmed: 22594660
Popul Dev Rev. 2017 May;43(Suppl Suppl 1):166-191
pubmed: 29081552
Lancet Glob Health. 2017 Apr;5(4):e448-e457
pubmed: 28237252
PLoS Curr. 2015 Apr 16;7:
pubmed: 25932347
Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966 Jul;44(3):Suppl:166-206
pubmed: 5338568