Direct Comparison Between the Kawase Approach and Retrosigmoid Intradural Suprameatal Corridor to Access the Petroclival Region Using Computed Tomography Quantitative Volumetric Analysis: A Cadaveric Study.
Anterior petrosectomy
Middle fossa
RISA
Skull base
Trigeminal nerve
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
received:
08
05
2022
revised:
24
07
2022
accepted:
25
07
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
6
10
2022
entrez:
10
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The anterior petrosectomy, also known as the Kawase approach, and the retrosigmoid intradural suprameatal approach (RISA) have both been used to reduce the petrous apex and access the petroclival region. Our goal was to compare the volumes and 3-dimensional shapes of bony resection obtained through each approach while trying to resemble realistic surgical settings. Five cadaveric specimens totaling 10 sides were dissected and analyzed. In every specimen, 1 side was used for the Kawase approach while the opposite side was used for the RISA. Petrosectomy volumes were assessed by comparing preoperative and postoperative thin-sliced computed tomography scans. Petrosectomy volumes were significantly larger through the Kawase approach than through the RISA (0.82 ± 0.11 vs. 0.49 ± 0.07 cm The Kawase approach invariably results in larger volumes of bony removal than the RISA operative variant, and the volume of petrosectomy that is spatially congruent is only partially identical. The Kawase corridor is best suited for middle fossa lesions that extend into the posterior fossa, while the RISA is suitable for pathologies mainly residing in the posterior fossa and extending into the Meckel cave.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35948218
pii: S1878-8750(22)01072-5
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.07.120
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e841-e849Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.