Electrokinetic characterization of hybrid NOA 81-glass microchips: Application to protein microchip electrophoresis with indirect fluorescence detection.
Norland 81
electroosmotic mobility
hybrid glass-based chip
indirect fluorescence detection
proteins
Journal
Electrophoresis
ISSN: 1522-2683
Titre abrégé: Electrophoresis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8204476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 2022
10 2022
Historique:
revised:
08
07
2022
received:
06
03
2022
accepted:
15
07
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
19
10
2022
entrez:
10
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A low-cost and straightforward hybrid NOA (Norland optical adhesive) 81-glass microchip electrophoresis device was designed and developed for protein separation using indirect fluorescence detection. This new microchip was first characterized in terms of surface charge density via electroosmotic mobility measurement and stability over time. A systematic determination of the electroosmotic mobility (μ
Identifiants
pubmed: 35948488
doi: 10.1002/elps.202200057
doi:
Substances chimiques
Proteins
0
Sulfhydryl Compounds
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2044-2048Informations de copyright
© 2022 Wiley-VCH GmbH.
Références
Nielsen JB, Hanson RL, Almughamsi HM, Pang C, Fish TR, Woolley AT. Microfluidics: innovations in materials and their fabrication and functionalization. Anal Chem. 2020;92:150-68.
Coltro WKT, Lunte SM, Carrilho E. Comparison of the analytical performance of electrophoresis microchannels fabricated in PDMS, glass, and polyester-toner. Electrophoresis. 2008;29:4928-37.
Rodriguez I, Spicar-Mihalic P, Kuyper CL, Fiorini GS, Chiu DT. Rapid prototyping of glass microchannels. Anal Chim Acta. 2003;496:205-15.
van Assenbergh P, Meinders E, Geraedts J, Dodou D. Nanostructure and microstructure fabrication: from desired properties to suitable processes. Small. 2018;14:1703401.
Zhou W, Dou M, Timilsina SS, Xu F, Li XJ. Recent innovations in cost-effective polymer and paper hybrid microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2021;21:2658-83.
Kim SH, Yang Y, Kim M, Nam SW, Lee KM, Lee NY, et al. Simple route to hydrophilic microfluidic chip fabrication using an ultraviolet (UV)-cured polymer. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17:3493-8.
Bartolo D, Degré G, Nghe P, Studer V. Microfluidic stickers. Lab Chip. 2008;8:274-9.
Losic D, Mitchell JG, Lal R, Voelcker NH. Rapid fabrication of micro- and nanoscale patterns by replica molding from diatom biosilica. Adv Funct Mater. 2007;17:2439-46.
Hung LH, Lin R, Lee AP. Rapid microfabrication of solvent-resistant biocompatible microfluidic devices. Lab Chip. 2008;8:983-7.
Dupont EP, Luisier R, Gijs MAM. NOA 63 as a UV-curable material for fabrication of microfluidic channels with native hydrophilicity. Microelectron Eng. 2010;87:1253-5.
Temiz Y, Lovchik RD, Kaigala GV, Delamarche E. Lab-on-a-chip devices: how to close and plug the lab? Microelectron Eng. 2015;132:156-75.
Sim JH, Moon HJ, Roh YH, Jung HW, Bong KW. Fabrication of NOA microfluidic devices based on sequential replica molding. Korean J Chem Eng. 2017;34:1495-9.
Neckel IT, de Castro LF, Callefo F, Teixeira VC, Gobbi AL, Piazzetta MH, et al. Development of a sticker sealed microfluidic device for in situ analytical measurements using synchrotron radiation. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23671.
Geczy R, Sticker D, Bovet N, Häfeli UO, Kutter JP. Chloroform compatible, thiol-ene based replica molded micro chemical devices as an alternative to glass microfluidic chips. Lab Chip. 2019;19:798-806.
Sticker D, Geczy R, Häfeli UO, Kutter JP. Thiol-ene based polymers as versatile materials for microfluidic devices for life sciences applications. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12:10080-95.
Tähkä SM, Bonabi A, Jokinen VP, Sikanen TM. Aqueous and non-aqueous microchip electrophoresis with on-chip electrospray ionization mass spectrometry on replica-molded thiol-ene microfluidic devices. J Chromatogr A. 2017;1496:150-6.
Tähkä SM, Bonabi A, Nordberg ME, Kanerva M, Jokinen VP, Sikanen TM. Thiol-ene microfluidic devices for microchip electrophoresis: effects of curing conditions and monomer composition on surface properties. J Chromatogr A. 2015;1426:233-40.
Wägli P, Homsy A, de Rooij NF. Norland optical adhesive (NOA81) microchannels with adjustable surface properties and high chemical resistance against IR-transparent organic solvents. Procedia Eng. 2010;5:460-3.
Levaché B, Azioune A, Bourrel M, Studer V, Bartolo D. Engineering the surface properties of microfluidic stickers. Lab Chip. 2012;12:3028-31.
Markovitz-Bishitz Y, Tauber Y, Afrimzon E, Zurgil N, Sobolev M, Shafran Y, et al. A polymer microstructure array for the formation, culturing, and high throughput drug screening of breast cancer spheroids. Biomaterials. 2010;31:8436-44.
Wägli P, Guélat BY, Homsy A, de Rooij NF. Microfluidic devices made of UV-curable glue (NOA81) for fluorescence detection based applications. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences. Groningen; 2010. p. 1937-9.
Piccin E, Coltro WKT, Fracassi da Silva JA, Neto SC, Mazo LH, Carrilho E. Polyurethane from biosource as a new material for fabrication of microfluidic devices by rapid prototyping. J Chromatogr A. 2007;1173:151-8.
Maridevarmath CV, Naik L, Malimath GH. Dielectric, photophysical, solvatochromic, and DFT studies on laser dye Coumarin 334. Braz J Phys. 2019;49:151-60.
Chien RL, Burgi DS. On-column sample concentration using field amplification in CZE. Anal Chem. 1992;64:489A-96A.
Schützner W, Kenndler E. Electrophoresis in synthetic organic polymer capillaries: variation of electroosmotic velocity and zeta potential with pH and solvent composition. Anal Chem. 2002;64:1991-5.
Janini GM, Chan KC, Barnes JA, Muschik GM, Issaq HJ. Effect of organic solvents on solute migration and separation in capillary zone electrophoresis. Chromatographia. 1993;35:497-502.
Hayes MA, Kheterpal I, Ewing AG. Effects of buffer pH on electroosmotic flow control by an applied radial voltage for capillary zone electrophoresis. Anal Chem. 1993;65:27-31.
Schwer C, Kenndler E. Electrophoresis in fused-silica capillaries: the influence of organic solvents on the electroosmotic velocity and the zeta potential. Anal Chem. 2002;63:1801-7.
Milanova D, Chambers RD, Bahga SS, Santiago JG. Effect of PVP on the electroosmotic mobility of wet-etched glass microchannels. Electrophoresis. 2012;33:3259-62.
Cahours X, Morin P, Dreux M. Influence of ionic strength and organic modifier on performance in capillary electrochromatography on phenyl silica stationary phase. J Chromatogr A. 1999;845:203-16.
Mokaddem M, Gareil P, Varenne A. Online CIEF-ESI-MS in glycerol-water media with a view to hydrophobic protein applications. Electrophoresis. 2009;30:4040-8.
Kim MS, Cho S, Lee KN, Kim YK. Fabrication of microchip electrophoresis devices and effects of channel surface properties on separation efficiency. Sens Actuators B. 2005;107:818-24.