Developing and pilot testing an oral health screening tool for diabetes care providers.
Diabetes
Health personnel
Oral health
Periodontal disease
Screening
Journal
BMC primary care
ISSN: 2731-4553
Titre abrégé: BMC Prim Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918300889006676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 08 2022
11 08 2022
Historique:
received:
04
04
2022
accepted:
06
07
2022
entrez:
10
8
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
People with poorly managed diabetes are at greater risk of periodontal disease. Periodontal disease that is not effectively managed can affect glycaemic levels. Diabetes care providers, including general practitioners and diabetes educators, are encouraged to promote oral health of their clients. However, valid and reliable oral health screening tools that assess the risk of poor oral health, that are easy to administer among non-dental professionals, currently do not exist. Existing screening tools are difficult to incorporate into routine diabetes consultations due to their length. Thus, this study aimed to develop and pilot a short oral health screening tool that would identify risk of existing oral diseases and encourage appropriate referrals to the dental service. A three-item screening tool was developed after a comprehensive review of the literature and consensus from an expert panel. The tool was then piloted as part of a larger cross-sectional survey of 260 adults with diabetes who were accessing public diabetes clinics at two locations in Sydney, Australia. As part of the survey, participants completed the three-item screening tool and a 14-item validated tool, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), which has been used previously in the preliminary validation of screening tools. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were then undertaken comparing the results of the two tools. A statistically significant correlation was found between the shorter screening tool and the OHIP-14 (rho = 0.453, p < 0.001), indicating adequate validity. The three-item tool had high sensitivity (90.5%, 95% CI 84.9%, 94.7%), with a specificity of 46.3% (95% CI 37.7%, 55.2%). The negative predictive value was 81.4% (95% CI 71.3, 89.3). No single item performed as well regarding sensitivity and negative predictive value when compared to the three items collectively. The three-item screening tool developed was found to be valid and sensitive in identifying risk of poor oral health, requiring oral health referrals, among people with diabetes in this pilot. This is a simple, accessible tool that diabetes care providers could incorporate into their routine consultations. Further validation against comprehensive dental assessments is needed to reassess the tool's specificity and sensitivity in diverse settings.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
People with poorly managed diabetes are at greater risk of periodontal disease. Periodontal disease that is not effectively managed can affect glycaemic levels. Diabetes care providers, including general practitioners and diabetes educators, are encouraged to promote oral health of their clients. However, valid and reliable oral health screening tools that assess the risk of poor oral health, that are easy to administer among non-dental professionals, currently do not exist. Existing screening tools are difficult to incorporate into routine diabetes consultations due to their length. Thus, this study aimed to develop and pilot a short oral health screening tool that would identify risk of existing oral diseases and encourage appropriate referrals to the dental service.
METHODS
A three-item screening tool was developed after a comprehensive review of the literature and consensus from an expert panel. The tool was then piloted as part of a larger cross-sectional survey of 260 adults with diabetes who were accessing public diabetes clinics at two locations in Sydney, Australia. As part of the survey, participants completed the three-item screening tool and a 14-item validated tool, the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14), which has been used previously in the preliminary validation of screening tools. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were then undertaken comparing the results of the two tools.
RESULTS
A statistically significant correlation was found between the shorter screening tool and the OHIP-14 (rho = 0.453, p < 0.001), indicating adequate validity. The three-item tool had high sensitivity (90.5%, 95% CI 84.9%, 94.7%), with a specificity of 46.3% (95% CI 37.7%, 55.2%). The negative predictive value was 81.4% (95% CI 71.3, 89.3). No single item performed as well regarding sensitivity and negative predictive value when compared to the three items collectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The three-item screening tool developed was found to be valid and sensitive in identifying risk of poor oral health, requiring oral health referrals, among people with diabetes in this pilot. This is a simple, accessible tool that diabetes care providers could incorporate into their routine consultations. Further validation against comprehensive dental assessments is needed to reassess the tool's specificity and sensitivity in diverse settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35948883
doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01798-5
pii: 10.1186/s12875-022-01798-5
pmc: PMC9367124
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
202Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):ZC78-ZC81
pubmed: 28969279
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006 Apr;34(2):114-22
pubmed: 16515675
BMC Fam Pract. 2020 Feb 13;21(1):34
pubmed: 32054440
Prev Chronic Dis. 2021 May 13;18:E47
pubmed: 33988497
BMC Public Health. 2018 May 2;18(1):577
pubmed: 29716561
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;86(3):239-46
pubmed: 19800143
Diabetes Educ. 2018 Oct;44(5):454-464
pubmed: 30141382
Nicotine Tob Res. 2019 Nov 19;21(12):1600-1608
pubmed: 30011036
Diabetes Care. 2010 Feb;33(2):421-7
pubmed: 20103557
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40 Suppl 14:S135-52
pubmed: 23627324
J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2011 Oct;15(4):388-92
pubmed: 22368365
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jun;54(6):831-841
pubmed: 29656920
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Feb;46(2):170-180
pubmed: 30657192
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2002 Jun;30(3):216-23
pubmed: 12000345
J Clin Periodontol. 2013 Apr;40 Suppl 14:S106-12
pubmed: 23627322
CMAJ. 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537-44
pubmed: 23798453
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019 Jun 18;12:883-899
pubmed: 31354324
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;(5):CD004714
pubmed: 20464734
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 May;97(21):e10777
pubmed: 29794757
Oral Dis. 2008 Apr;14(3):191-203
pubmed: 18336370
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2012 Jan;2(1):8-12
pubmed: 24478960
J Dent Res. 2010 Mar;89(3):307-11
pubmed: 20093674
Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307
pubmed: 29209603
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;18(7):
pubmed: 33810479
Aust Dent J. 2013 Sep;58(3):350-7
pubmed: 23981218
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Nov;157:107839
pubmed: 31520714
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Mar;137:231-241
pubmed: 29208508
Community Dent Health. 1994 Mar;11(1):3-11
pubmed: 8193981
J Clin Periodontol. 2018 Oct;45(10):1150-1163
pubmed: 30136741
Am J Med Sci. 2013 Apr;345(4):271-273
pubmed: 23531957
Health Care Women Int. 2015;36(10):1160-74
pubmed: 25299615
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2001 Oct;29(5):373-81
pubmed: 11553110
Diabetes Metab. 2008 Nov;34(5):497-506
pubmed: 18948050
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2010 Jan;87(1):4-14
pubmed: 19896746
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):347
pubmed: 27829388
J Am Dent Assoc. 2008 Oct;139 Suppl:19S-24S
pubmed: 18809650
Clin Oral Investig. 2021 Dec;25(12):6661-6669
pubmed: 33978832
J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2014 Feb 04;13(1):32
pubmed: 24495383
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Jun;11(6):ZE21-ZE26
pubmed: 28764312
Diabetes Care. 2007 Dec;30(12):3046-7
pubmed: 17712028
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Dec;3(12):958-67
pubmed: 26388413
Br Dent J. 2019 Oct;227(7):577-584
pubmed: 31605062
BDJ Open. 2018 Apr 27;4:17036
pubmed: 30057791
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jun 15;18(1):182
pubmed: 32539861