Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS): using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for detecting, visualizing and monitoring the healing process.
Anal Canal
/ diagnostic imaging
Delivery, Obstetric
/ adverse effects
Episiotomy
/ adverse effects
Fecal Incontinence
/ diagnostic imaging
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Lacerations
/ diagnostic imaging
Obstetric Labor Complications
/ diagnostic imaging
Perineum
/ diagnostic imaging
Pregnancy
Retrospective Studies
Anal sphincter injuries
Obstetric anal sphincter injury
Third-degree perineal tear
Transperineal ultrasound
Journal
BMC women's health
ISSN: 1472-6874
Titre abrégé: BMC Womens Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088690
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
10 08 2022
10 08 2022
Historique:
received:
06
04
2022
accepted:
25
07
2022
entrez:
10
8
2022
pubmed:
11
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The aim of this study was to examine whether OASIS, and its extent, can be confirmed or excluded using transperineal ultrasound (TPUS). A further objective of this study was to monitor the healing process over a period of 6 months and to establish a connection between the sonographic appearance of obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) and anal incontinence. In this retrospective clinical study, women with OASIS who gave birth between March 2014 and August 2019 were enrolled. All the patients underwent TPUS 3 days and 6 months after delivery. A GE E8 Voluson ultrasound system with a 3.5-5 MHz ultrasound probe was used. The ultrasound images showed a third-degree injury, with the measurement of the width of the tear and its extent (superficial, partial, complete, EAS and IAS involvement). A positive contraction effect, a sign of sufficient contraction, was documented. Six months after delivery, a sonographic assessment of the healing (healed, scar or still fully present) was performed. A Wexner score was obtained from each patient. The patients' medical histories, including age, parity, episiotomy and child's weight, were added. Thirty-one of the 55 recruited patients were included in the statistical evaluation. Three patients were excluded from the statistical evaluation because OASIS was excluded on TPUS 3 days after delivery. One patient underwent revision surgery for anal incontinence and an inadequately repaired anal sphincter injury, as shown sonographic assessment, 9 days after delivery. Twenty patients were excluded for other reasons. The results suggest that a tear that appears smaller (in mm) after 3 days implies better healing after 6 months. This effect was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0328). Regarding anal incontinence, women who received an episiotomy had fewer anal incontinence symptoms after 6 months. The effect of episiotomy was statistically significant, with a significance level of alpha = 5% (p = 0.0367). TPUS is an accessible, non-invasive method for detecting, quantifying, following-up and monitoring OASIS in patients with third-degree perineal tears. The width, as obtained by sonography, is important with regard to the healing of OASIS. A mediolateral episiotomy seems to prevent anal incontinence after 6 months.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35948903
doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-01915-7
pii: 10.1186/s12905-022-01915-7
pmc: PMC9364618
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
339Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 08;2:CD000081
pubmed: 28176333
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2019 Apr;31(4):e13537
pubmed: 30680849
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003 Oct;82(10):921-8
pubmed: 12956842
World J Radiol. 2016 Apr 28;8(4):370-7
pubmed: 27158423
BMJ. 1993 Sep 11;307(6905):636-7
pubmed: 8401042
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2016 Mar;43(1):93-119
pubmed: 26880511
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;104(9):999-1003
pubmed: 9307524
Tech Coloproctol. 2020 Mar;24(3):221-229
pubmed: 32020351
Int J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jun 20;6(4):460-467
pubmed: 31728401
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Aug;227(2):182-191
pubmed: 35550375
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Jan 7;23(1):11-24
pubmed: 28104977
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 13;6:CD006672
pubmed: 28608597
PLoS Med. 2017 Jan 24;14(1):e1002220
pubmed: 28118360
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;30(2):210-20
pubmed: 17659660
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Aug;30(2):201-9
pubmed: 17605148
BMC Womens Health. 2021 Jun 18;21(1):247
pubmed: 34144688
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Dec;37(12):1131-48
pubmed: 26637088
Int Urogynecol J. 2021 Jul;32(7):1611-1622
pubmed: 33991222
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Feb;29(2):195-204
pubmed: 17219371