Evaluation of a technical advisory board for an occupational injury surveillance research project: A qualitative study.

advisory board commercial fishing occupational injury safety surveillance

Journal

Health science reports
ISSN: 2398-8835
Titre abrégé: Health Sci Rep
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101728855

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2022
Historique:
received: 04 05 2022
revised: 12 07 2022
accepted: 17 07 2022
entrez: 11 8 2022
pubmed: 12 8 2022
medline: 12 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Advisory boards play a key role in guiding and informing research programs, including occupational health surveillance. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of these advisory boards. This report details the organization of the Risk Information System for Commercial (RISC) Fishing Technical Advisory Board (TAB), the approach taken to evaluate the TAB, and the results of the evaluation. The RISC TAB was formed to provide advice and recommendations to the study team and informed the development and use of the safety surveillance system. The evaluation approach was informed by limited previous literature on advisory board assessments. This evaluation was conducted in Year 5 of the 6-year project. A review of the meeting notes, materials and correspondences, and study progress was conducted internally to document input from the board and associated actions. To obtain member perspectives, we surveyed the TAB and discussed it in a subsequent TAB meeting. The RISC Fishing TAB members constitute a wide variety of commercial fishing safety stakeholders. The internal analysis identified the main project aspects and 14 of the proposed changes from the TAB that have either been implemented or are in progress in the project. Ten of the 15 TAB members responded indicating a positive experience on board organization and conduct. Evaluation of advisory boards is an essential part of a research program. A process is outlined in this report to inform future efforts to document measurable ways to inform projects based on advisory board feedback and reflections.

Sections du résumé

Background and Aims UNASSIGNED
Advisory boards play a key role in guiding and informing research programs, including occupational health surveillance. It is important to evaluate the effectiveness of these advisory boards. This report details the organization of the Risk Information System for Commercial (RISC) Fishing Technical Advisory Board (TAB), the approach taken to evaluate the TAB, and the results of the evaluation. The RISC TAB was formed to provide advice and recommendations to the study team and informed the development and use of the safety surveillance system.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The evaluation approach was informed by limited previous literature on advisory board assessments. This evaluation was conducted in Year 5 of the 6-year project. A review of the meeting notes, materials and correspondences, and study progress was conducted internally to document input from the board and associated actions. To obtain member perspectives, we surveyed the TAB and discussed it in a subsequent TAB meeting.
Results UNASSIGNED
The RISC Fishing TAB members constitute a wide variety of commercial fishing safety stakeholders. The internal analysis identified the main project aspects and 14 of the proposed changes from the TAB that have either been implemented or are in progress in the project. Ten of the 15 TAB members responded indicating a positive experience on board organization and conduct.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Evaluation of advisory boards is an essential part of a research program. A process is outlined in this report to inform future efforts to document measurable ways to inform projects based on advisory board feedback and reflections.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35949683
doi: 10.1002/hsr2.777
pii: HSR2777
pmc: PMC9358660
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e777

Informations de copyright

© 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001 Jul 27;50(RR-13):1-35; quiz CE1-7
pubmed: 18634202
Inj Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 5;8(1):26
pubmed: 34218819
J Agromedicine. 2022 Jul;27(3):284-291
pubmed: 34228604
Am J Ind Med. 2020 Aug;63(8):713-725
pubmed: 32483871
Wilderness Environ Med. 2019 Sep;30(3):281-286
pubmed: 31301994
J Clin Transl Sci. 2019 Sep 20;3(5):218-226
pubmed: 31660246

Auteurs

Amelia Vaughan (A)

College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.

Viktor Bovbjerg (V)

College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.

Solaiman Doza (S)

College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.

Laurel Kincl (L)

College of Public Health and Human Sciences Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon USA.

Classifications MeSH