Relationship between rumen microbial differences and traits among Hu sheep, Tan sheep, and Dorper sheep.
16S rDNA sequencing
Dorper sheep
Hu sheep
Tan sheep
rumen microorganism
Journal
Journal of animal science
ISSN: 1525-3163
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003002
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Sep 2022
01 Sep 2022
Historique:
received:
07
05
2022
accepted:
10
08
2022
pubmed:
12
8
2022
medline:
24
9
2022
entrez:
11
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Rumen microbes play an important role in the growth and development of ruminants. Differences in variety will affect the rumen community structure. The three excellent sheep breeds were selected for this study (Hu sheep, Tan sheep, and Dorper sheep) have different uses and origins. The sheep were raised on the same diet to 180 d of age in a consistent environment. 16S rDNA V3 to V4 region sequencing was used to assess the rumen microbes of 180 individuals (60 per breed). There were differences in microbial diversity among different sheep breeds (P < 0.05). Principal coordinate analysis showed that the three varieties were separated, but also partially overlapped. Linear discriminant analysis effect size identified a total of 19 biomarkers in three breeds. Of these biomarkers, five in Hu sheep were significantly negatively correlated with average feed conversion rate (P < 0.05). Six biomarkers were identified in the rumen of Dorper sheep, among which Ruminococcus was significantly positively correlated with body weight at 80 d (P < 0.05). In Tan sheep, Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group was significantly positively correlated with meat fat, and significantly positively correlated with volatile fatty acids (VFAs), such as butyric acid and isobutyric acid (P < 0.05). The Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group may regulate Tan mutton fat deposition by affecting the concentration of VFAs. Functional prediction revealed enrichment differences of functional pathways among different sheep breeds were small. All were enriched in functions, such as fermentation and chemoheterotrophy. The results show that there are differences in the rumen microorganisms of the different sheep breeds, and that the microorganisms influence the host. The rumen is the most important digestive organ of ruminants, and the rumen microflora plays an important role in the process of digestion. This study compared the differences in rumen microbes of different breeds of sheep, identified key biomarkers of each breed, and analyzed their correlation with important economic traits of sheep. The results showed that the biomarkers of various breeds were significantly correlated with key traits. Therefore, we believe that there is a link between sheep rumen microbes and the differential traits of different breeds of sheep. This provides a new idea for sheep trait improvement.
Autres résumés
Type: plain-language-summary
(eng)
The rumen is the most important digestive organ of ruminants, and the rumen microflora plays an important role in the process of digestion. This study compared the differences in rumen microbes of different breeds of sheep, identified key biomarkers of each breed, and analyzed their correlation with important economic traits of sheep. The results showed that the biomarkers of various breeds were significantly correlated with key traits. Therefore, we believe that there is a link between sheep rumen microbes and the differential traits of different breeds of sheep. This provides a new idea for sheep trait improvement.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35953151
pii: 6661412
doi: 10.1093/jas/skac261
pmc: PMC9492252
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Butyrates
0
DNA, Ribosomal
0
Isobutyrates
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : National Key R&D Program of China
ID : 2021YFD1300901
Organisme : Key R&D Program of Gansu Province
ID : 20YF3NA012
Organisme : "Western Light" talent training program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences "Western Young Scholars" Category A Project
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Sci China Life Sci. 2021 Jul;64(7):1116-1130
pubmed: 32997330
J Dairy Sci. 1997 Apr;80(4):740-6
pubmed: 9149968
Nat Methods. 2013 Oct;10(10):996-8
pubmed: 23955772
Nutrients. 2020 Oct 20;12(10):
pubmed: 33092019
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl). 2019 Nov;103(6):1708-1718
pubmed: 31518020
Can J Microbiol. 2006 Mar;52(3):237-45
pubmed: 16604120
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2017 Jan;49(1):121-129
pubmed: 27743146
Br J Nutr. 2020 May 28;123(10):1127-1137
pubmed: 32008579
Indian J Microbiol. 2020 Dec;60(4):436-450
pubmed: 33087993
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019 Sep;51(7):1903-1908
pubmed: 31001729
Int J Obes (Lond). 2021 Oct;45(10):2261-2268
pubmed: 34267323
J Dairy Sci. 1990 Oct;73(10):3023-32
pubmed: 2178175
J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2021 Nov 2;12(1):118
pubmed: 34727982
BMC Vet Res. 2021 Jun 25;17(1):224
pubmed: 34172061
J Dairy Sci. 2018 Aug;101(8):7680-7689
pubmed: 29102146
Braz J Microbiol. 2020 Dec;51(4):1573-1583
pubmed: 32949385
Microbiome. 2021 Jun 12;9(1):137
pubmed: 34118976
Gut Microbes. 2019;10(2):115-132
pubmed: 30207838
Meat Sci. 2015 Dec;110:278-84
pubmed: 26319308
Genome Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):494-504
pubmed: 21212162
Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 1992;31(1-2):1-58
pubmed: 1734915
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2016 Mar;363(6):
pubmed: 26850444
J Anim Sci. 2013 Oct;91(10):4628-32
pubmed: 23893989
Mol Biol Rep. 2012 Mar;39(3):2761-6
pubmed: 21674186
Nucleic Acids Res. 2013 Jan;41(Database issue):D590-6
pubmed: 23193283
Parasite. 2017;24:54
pubmed: 29267159
Bioinformatics. 2011 Nov 1;27(21):2957-63
pubmed: 21903629
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 01;10(6):e0129174
pubmed: 26030887
Genet Sel Evol. 2018 May 24;50(1):29
pubmed: 29793424
Animal. 2021 May;15(5):100216
pubmed: 34051409
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1990
pubmed: 33479378
Microbiologyopen. 2019 May;8(5):e00708
pubmed: 30085417
Foods. 2020 Aug 26;9(9):
pubmed: 32858830
Animals (Basel). 2020 Jun 13;10(6):
pubmed: 32545764
Front Vet Sci. 2021 May 25;8:673822
pubmed: 34113677
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013 Oct;79(19):5962-9
pubmed: 23872556
J Dairy Sci. 1981 Jun;64(6):1153-69
pubmed: 7024344
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010 Oct;76(19):6338-50
pubmed: 20709849
Nat Methods. 2013 Jan;10(1):57-9
pubmed: 23202435
J Sci Food Agric. 2021 Feb;101(3):1100-1110
pubmed: 32767556
Nat Commun. 2018 Mar 6;9(1):813
pubmed: 29511174
Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2020;171:237-263
pubmed: 32475524
Animals (Basel). 2022 Mar 30;12(7):
pubmed: 35405869
Animals (Basel). 2020 Oct 16;10(10):
pubmed: 33081312
Heliyon. 2020 Apr 26;6(4):e03840
pubmed: 32373742
ISME J. 2014 Feb;8(2):295-308
pubmed: 24030595
Front Microbiol. 2020 Aug 25;11:1981
pubmed: 32983009
BMC Microbiol. 2016 May 04;16:78
pubmed: 27141986
Arch Tierernahr. 1993;44(1):1-10
pubmed: 8215880
BMC Vet Res. 2020 Jul 23;16(1):254
pubmed: 32703277