Limited evidence for blood eQTLs in human sexual dimorphism.
Journal
Genome medicine
ISSN: 1756-994X
Titre abrégé: Genome Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101475844
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
11 08 2022
11 08 2022
Historique:
received:
20
10
2021
accepted:
14
07
2022
entrez:
11
8
2022
pubmed:
12
8
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The genetic underpinning of sexual dimorphism is very poorly understood. The prevalence of many diseases differs between men and women, which could be in part caused by sex-specific genetic effects. Nevertheless, only a few published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed separately in each sex. The reported enrichment of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) among GWAS-associated SNPs suggests a potential role of sex-specific eQTLs in the sex-specific genetic mechanism underlying complex traits. To explore this scenario, we combined sex-specific whole blood RNA-seq eQTL data from 3447 European individuals included in BIOS Consortium and GWAS data from UK Biobank. Next, to test the presence of sex-biased causal effect of gene expression on complex traits, we performed sex-specific transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization (TWMR) analyses on the two most sexually dimorphic traits, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and testosterone levels. Finally, we performed power analysis to calculate the GWAS sample size needed to observe sex-specific trait associations driven by sex-biased eQTLs. Among 9 million SNP-gene pairs showing sex-combined associations, we found 18 genes with significant sex-biased cis-eQTLs (FDR 5%). Our phenome-wide association study of the 18 top sex-biased eQTLs on >700 traits unraveled that these eQTLs do not systematically translate into detectable sex-biased trait-associations. In addition, we observed that sex-specific causal effects of gene expression on complex traits are not driven by sex-specific eQTLs. Power analyses using real eQTL- and causal-effect sizes showed that millions of samples would be necessary to observe sex-biased trait associations that are fully driven by sex-biased cis-eQTLs. Compensatory effects may further hamper their detection. Our results suggest that sex-specific eQTLs in whole blood do not translate to detectable sex-specific trait associations of complex diseases, and vice versa that the observed sex-specific trait associations cannot be explained by sex-specific eQTLs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The genetic underpinning of sexual dimorphism is very poorly understood. The prevalence of many diseases differs between men and women, which could be in part caused by sex-specific genetic effects. Nevertheless, only a few published genome-wide association studies (GWAS) were performed separately in each sex. The reported enrichment of expression quantitative trait loci (eQTLs) among GWAS-associated SNPs suggests a potential role of sex-specific eQTLs in the sex-specific genetic mechanism underlying complex traits.
METHODS
To explore this scenario, we combined sex-specific whole blood RNA-seq eQTL data from 3447 European individuals included in BIOS Consortium and GWAS data from UK Biobank. Next, to test the presence of sex-biased causal effect of gene expression on complex traits, we performed sex-specific transcriptome-wide Mendelian randomization (TWMR) analyses on the two most sexually dimorphic traits, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) and testosterone levels. Finally, we performed power analysis to calculate the GWAS sample size needed to observe sex-specific trait associations driven by sex-biased eQTLs.
RESULTS
Among 9 million SNP-gene pairs showing sex-combined associations, we found 18 genes with significant sex-biased cis-eQTLs (FDR 5%). Our phenome-wide association study of the 18 top sex-biased eQTLs on >700 traits unraveled that these eQTLs do not systematically translate into detectable sex-biased trait-associations. In addition, we observed that sex-specific causal effects of gene expression on complex traits are not driven by sex-specific eQTLs. Power analyses using real eQTL- and causal-effect sizes showed that millions of samples would be necessary to observe sex-biased trait associations that are fully driven by sex-biased cis-eQTLs. Compensatory effects may further hamper their detection.
CONCLUSIONS
Our results suggest that sex-specific eQTLs in whole blood do not translate to detectable sex-specific trait associations of complex diseases, and vice versa that the observed sex-specific trait associations cannot be explained by sex-specific eQTLs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35953856
doi: 10.1186/s13073-022-01088-w
pii: 10.1186/s13073-022-01088-w
pmc: PMC9373355
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
89Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_PC_17228
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_QA137853
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Nat Genet. 2016 Mar;48(3):245-52
pubmed: 26854917
Exp Gerontol. 2016 Sep;82:166-74
pubmed: 27374409
Nat Genet. 2013 Oct;45(10):1238-1243
pubmed: 24013639
Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1284-1287
pubmed: 27571263
BMC Bioinformatics. 2020 Jun 12;21(1):243
pubmed: 32532224
Nat Genet. 2020 Jun;52(6):626-633
pubmed: 32424349
PLoS Genet. 2013 Jun;9(6):e1003500
pubmed: 23754948
Science. 2020 Sep 11;369(6509):
pubmed: 32913072
Hum Mol Genet. 2014 Apr 1;23(7):1947-56
pubmed: 24242183
Nat Genet. 2016 Nov;48(11):1443-1448
pubmed: 27694958
PLoS Genet. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002197
pubmed: 21829388
Cell Rep. 2019 Nov 12;29(7):1961-1973.e4
pubmed: 31722210
Comput Stat Data Anal. 2009 Jan 15;53(3):603-608
pubmed: 20084090
Bioinformatics. 2015 Jan 15;31(2):166-9
pubmed: 25260700
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2010 Jun;13(3):231-45
pubmed: 20477721
Nat Genet. 2016 May;48(5):481-7
pubmed: 27019110
Neurobiol Dis. 2012 Jul;47(1):20-8
pubmed: 22433082
Nat Genet. 2016 Oct;48(10):1279-83
pubmed: 27548312
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2013 Feb;16(1):271-81
pubmed: 23298648
Int J Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;40(2):294-307
pubmed: 20167617
Brain. 2019 Sep 1;142(9):2581-2589
pubmed: 31497858
Science. 1999 Feb 26;283(5406):1277-8
pubmed: 10084932
Genome Res. 2012 Dec;22(12):2368-75
pubmed: 22960374
Genome Biol. 2016 Dec 1;17(1):248
pubmed: 27908293
Nat Commun. 2019 Apr 23;10(1):1847
pubmed: 31015462
Genome Res. 2016 Jun;26(6):768-77
pubmed: 27197214
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011 Oct;82(10):1165-70
pubmed: 21622937
Hum Mol Genet. 2017 Apr 15;26(8):1444-1451
pubmed: 28165122
Nat Genet. 2021 May;53(5):663-671
pubmed: 33888908
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 15;83(12):1044-1053
pubmed: 29325848
BMC Genomics. 2014 Jan 17;15:33
pubmed: 24438232
N Engl J Med. 2015 Sep 3;373(10):895-907
pubmed: 26287746
Nat Genet. 2006 Nov;38(11):1289-97
pubmed: 17013392
PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e50938
pubmed: 23236413
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Jan;14(1):79-84
pubmed: 16251894
Nat Rev Genet. 2019 Mar;20(3):173-190
pubmed: 30581192
Front Biosci. 2006 May 01;11:1679-89
pubmed: 16368546
Twin Res Hum Genet. 2016 Dec;19(6):595-599
pubmed: 27852355
Eur J Clin Invest. 2011 Apr;41(4):372-9
pubmed: 21114489
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Aug;1(4):e181670
pubmed: 30294719
Nat Genet. 2017 Jan;49(1):139-145
pubmed: 27918533
Nat Commun. 2019 Jul 24;10(1):3300
pubmed: 31341166
Eur J Epidemiol. 2013 Nov;28(11):889-926
pubmed: 24258680
Nature. 2018 Oct;562(7726):203-209
pubmed: 30305743
Bioinformatics. 2013 Jan 1;29(1):15-21
pubmed: 23104886
PLoS Genet. 2013;9(8):e1003649
pubmed: 23935528
Elife. 2020 Mar 09;9:
pubmed: 32149610
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 21;10(1):339
pubmed: 30664634
Nat Genet. 2014 May;46(5):430-7
pubmed: 24728292
PLoS Genet. 2010 Apr 01;6(4):e1000895
pubmed: 20369022
BMJ Open. 2015 Aug 28;5(8):e006772
pubmed: 26319774
Nature. 2010 Aug 5;466(7307):714-9
pubmed: 20686566
Nat Genet. 2021 Sep;53(9):1300-1310
pubmed: 34475573
Nat Commun. 2015 Sep 14;6:8111
pubmed: 26368830
Am Heart J. 1986 Feb;111(2):383-90
pubmed: 3946178
Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Feb;22(2):221-7
pubmed: 23714750
Nat Genet. 2012 Mar 25;44(5):502-10
pubmed: 22446964
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 29;7:10558
pubmed: 26822151
PLoS Genet. 2010 Apr 01;6(4):e1000888
pubmed: 20369019
Nat Genet. 2017 Dec;49(12):1676-1683
pubmed: 29058715
Hum Mol Genet. 2019 Jan 1;28(1):166-174
pubmed: 30239722
Eur J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;30(8):661-708
pubmed: 26386597