Long-term Mammography Utilization after an Initial Randomized Intervention Period by all Underserved Chilean Women in the Clinics.
Chile
Latin America
RE-AIM framework
breast cancer
low socioeconomic status
mammography
Journal
Cancers
ISSN: 2072-6694
Titre abrégé: Cancers (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101526829
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 Jul 2022
31 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
01
06
2022
revised:
17
07
2022
accepted:
26
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Chile has one of the highest rates of breast cancer in Latin America. Mammography rates among women, especially those of low socioeconomic status (SES), are thought to contribute to high breast cancer morbidity and mortality. A successful randomized controlled trial among women aged 50 to 70 in a low-SES primary care clinic in Chile led to a significant increase in mammography screening rates in a two-year intervention trial. This study assesses the sustainability of the intervention after ten years and identifies factors that might have been associated with a long-term effect using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. The mammography rates among women aged 50 to 70 in the low-SES intervention clinic were compared to two populations of women aged 50 to 70 from middle-SES clinics and to national data. Qualitative data were used to answer questions of adoption, implementation, and maintenance, while quantitative data assessed the reach and effectiveness. After ten years, low-SES women at the intervention clinic maintained significantly higher mammography screening rates vs. middle-SES women at the comparison clinics (36.2% vs. 30.1% and 19.4% p < 0.0001). Women of a low SES at the intervention clinic also had significantly higher screening rates compared to women of a low SES at a national level (44.2% vs. 34.2% p < 0.0001). RE-AIM factors contributed to understanding the long-term difference in rates. Mailed contact, outreach interventions, and the integration of health promoters as part of the Community Advisory Board were important factors associated with the effects observed. This study provides information on factors that could contribute to reducing the social gap on breast cancer screening.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35954397
pii: cancers14153734
doi: 10.3390/cancers14153734
pmc: PMC9367461
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Références
Prev Med. 2020 Dec;141:106242
pubmed: 32882299
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Sep;189(2):561-569
pubmed: 34244869
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010 Sep;19(9):2254-61
pubmed: 20826832
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:451-456
pubmed: 30231404
Am J Public Health. 2013 Jun;103(6):e38-46
pubmed: 23597377
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Sep 15;186(6):648-658
pubmed: 28486584
Biol Res. 2015 Jan 26;48:10
pubmed: 25761441
Int J Cancer. 2021 Jan 15;148(2):406-418
pubmed: 32683673
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64
pubmed: 30984733
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 26;9:755738
pubmed: 35155336
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 25;14(11):e0225667
pubmed: 31765426
Fam Pract. 2010 Feb;27(1):85-92
pubmed: 19897514
Breast. 2011 Apr;20 Suppl 2:S40-5
pubmed: 21334897
Cancer. 2021 Dec 1;127(23):4512-4515
pubmed: 34436765
J Prim Care Community Health. 2020 Jan-Dec;11:2150132720924884
pubmed: 32468927
Global Health. 2016 Jul 12;12(1):39
pubmed: 27405471
Aten Primaria. 2020 Dec;52(10):690-696
pubmed: 32499147