Effectiveness of Whole-Body High-Intensity Interval Training on Health-Related Fitness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
body composition
cardiorespiratory endurance
functional high-intensity training
metabolic risk factors
musculoskeletal fitness
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 08 2022
03 08 2022
Historique:
received:
29
06
2022
revised:
27
07
2022
accepted:
29
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Due to its versatility, whole-body high-intensity interval training (WB-HIIT) can be proposed to the general population and patients to improve health-related fitness. However, its effectiveness compared to traditional aerobic continuous or interval trainings has yet to be determined. A search of four electronic databases was conducted. Studies reporting the effects of WB-HIIT on cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), fat mass, fat-free mass, musculoskeletal fitness and metabolic risk factors were included. Standardized mean differences (SMD) between WB-HIIT and no exercise or traditional aerobic trainings were calculated. A meta-regression assessed the effect of total training time on the different outcomes. Twenty-two studies were included in the systematic review and nineteen in the meta-analysis. Compared to no exercise, WB-HIIT improves CRF (SMD: 0.75; 95%CI: 0.28, 1.23; p < 0.001), fat-free mass (SMD: 0.38; 95%CI: 0.11, 0.65; p < 0.001), fat mass (SMD: 0.40; 95%CI: 0.09, 0.72; p < 0.001) and musculoskeletal fitness (SMD: 0.84; 95%CI: 0.61, 1.08; p < 0.001). Compared to other aerobic trainings, WB-HIIT has a lower effect on CRF (SMD: −0.40; 95%CI: −0.70, −0.11; p = 0.007), a similar effect on fat-free mass (SMD: −0.04; 95%CI: −0.44, 0.35; p = 0.8) and fat mass (SMD: −0.07; 95%CI: −0.39, 0.25; p = 0.7), and a larger effect on musculoskeletal fitness (SMD: 0.42; 95%CI: 0.14, 0.71; p = 0.003). WB-HIIT overall effect and specific effect on CRF and fat mass were associated with total training time. The systematic review did not provide evidence of metabolic risk improvement. Despite a slightly lower effect on CRF, WB-HIIT is equally effective as traditional aerobic trainings to improve body composition and more effective to enhance musculoskeletal fitness, which is essential for execution of daily tasks.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35954911
pii: ijerph19159559
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159559
pmc: PMC9367756
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Review
Systematic Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
Percept Mot Skills. 2019 Oct;126(5):828-842
pubmed: 31284844
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 28;18(21):
pubmed: 34769831
BMJ. 2009 Jul 21;339:b2700
pubmed: 19622552
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2021 Mar;92(1):1-10
pubmed: 32023202
Sports Med. 2015 Oct;45(10):1469-81
pubmed: 26243014
J Sports Sci. 2019 Jul;37(14):1561-1569
pubmed: 30724683
Sports Med. 2021 Mar;51(3):405-421
pubmed: 33512698
J Physiol. 2017 May 1;595(9):2915-2930
pubmed: 27748956
Calcif Tissue Int. 2019 Jul;105(1):1-14
pubmed: 30972475
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012 Dec;37(6):1124-31
pubmed: 22994393
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2020 Jun;45(6):650-658
pubmed: 31782930
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Mar;23(5):518-29
pubmed: 25901000
Sports (Basel). 2018 Aug 07;6(3):
pubmed: 30087252
J Physiol. 2019 Aug;597(16):4203-4225
pubmed: 31218680
Int J Med Sci. 2016 Jan 01;13(1):25-38
pubmed: 26816492
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 23;13(8):e0202390
pubmed: 30138475
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2019 Nov;39(6):378-383
pubmed: 28471050
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 Jun;217:103321
pubmed: 33957573
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 10;17(5):
pubmed: 32164314
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71
pubmed: 33782057
J Sports Sci Med. 2019 Aug 01;18(3):497-504
pubmed: 31427872
Physiol Rep. 2017 Sep;5(17):
pubmed: 28912129
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Oct 30;16(21):
pubmed: 31671584
J Strength Cond Res. 2018 Oct;32(10):2730-2742
pubmed: 29746386
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2016 May;56(5):534-40
pubmed: 25942012
Front Physiol. 2018 May 09;9:423
pubmed: 29867519
Sci Rep. 2020 Dec 10;10(1):21680
pubmed: 33303848
Int J Sports Med. 2019 Feb;40(2):116-124
pubmed: 30605922
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 2021 Jun 22;:
pubmed: 34156180
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 Jun;152:156-165
pubmed: 31102684
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 12;16(24):
pubmed: 31842259
Sports Med. 2019 Nov;49(11):1687-1721
pubmed: 31401727
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 20;17(10):
pubmed: 32443802
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2015 Nov;24(6):812-7
pubmed: 26094701
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2020 Apr;120(4):771-782
pubmed: 32193660
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2019 Jul;23(3):456-460
pubmed: 31563355
J Spec Oper Med. 2021 Winter;21(4):112-115
pubmed: 34969140
J Aging Phys Act. 2019 May 29;27(4):929-944
pubmed: 31141447
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2019 Jan;29(1):144-153
pubmed: 30276916
J Physiother. 2020 Jan;66(1):59
pubmed: 31521549
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):332-340
pubmed: 30194221
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014 Jan;46(1):42-50
pubmed: 23846165