The Perception of the Patient Safety Climate by Health Professionals during the COVID-19 Pandemic-International Research.
health professionals
healthcare workers
nurse
paramedic
physician
safety attitudes questionnaire
safety climate
safety culture
Journal
International journal of environmental research and public health
ISSN: 1660-4601
Titre abrégé: Int J Environ Res Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238455
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 08 2022
06 08 2022
Historique:
received:
05
07
2022
revised:
31
07
2022
accepted:
02
08
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The patient safety climate is a key element of quality in healthcare. It should be a priority in the healthcare systems of all countries in the world. The goal of patient safety programs is to prevent errors and reduce the potential harm to patients when using healthcare services. A safety climate is also necessary to ensure a safe working environment for healthcare professionals. The attitudes of healthcare workers toward patient safety in various aspects of work, organization and functioning of the ward are important elements of the organization’s safety culture. The aim of this study was to determine the perception of the patient safety climate by healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The study was conducted in five European countries. The Safety Attitude Questionnaire (SAQ) short version was used for the study. A total of 1061 healthcare workers: physicians, nurses and paramedics, participated in this study. Results: All groups received the highest mean results on the stress recognition subscale (SR): nurses 98.77, paramedics 96.39 and physician 98.28. Nurses and physicians evaluated work conditions (WC) to be the lowest (47.19 and 44.99), while paramedics evaluated perceptions of management (PM) as the worst (46.44). Paramedics achieved statistically significantly lower scores compared to nurses and physicians in job satisfaction (JS), stress recognition (SR) and perception of management (PM) (p < 0.0001). Paramedics compared to nurses and physicians rank better in working conditions (WC) in relation to patient safety (16.21%). Most often, persons of lower seniority scored higher in all subscales (p = 0.001). In Poland, Spain, France, Turkey, and Greece, healthcare workers scored highest in stress recognition (SR). In Poland, Spain, France, and Turkey, they assessed working conditions (WC) as the worst, while in Greece, the perception of management (PM) had the lowest result. Conclusion: Participant perceptions about the patient safety climate were not at a particularly satisfactory level, and there is still a need for the development of patient safety culture in healthcare in Europe. Overall, positive working conditions, good management and effective teamwork can contribute to improving employees’ attitudes toward patient safety. This study was carried out during the COVID-19 pandemic and should be repeated after its completion, and comparative studies will allow for a more precise determination of the safety climate in the assessment of employees.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35955067
pii: ijerph19159712
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159712
pmc: PMC9368342
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Références
West J Nurs Res. 2019 Feb;41(2):279-304
pubmed: 29243563
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2016 Nov;48(6):552-560
pubmed: 27779820
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Apr 03;6:44
pubmed: 16584553
Int J Qual Health Care. 2015 Dec;27(6):499-506
pubmed: 26443813
Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):470-475
pubmed: 32246652
J Patient Saf. 2019 Mar;15(1):1-6
pubmed: 26001549
Rev Bras Enferm. 2017 Nov-Dec;70(6):1284-1290
pubmed: 29160491
Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Mar 18;7(1):
pubmed: 30889867
Int Emerg Nurs. 2021 Sep;58:101048
pubmed: 34481382
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 20;17(1):424
pubmed: 28633657
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2012 Mar;97(2):F127-32
pubmed: 22337935
Rev Bras Enferm. 2021 Apr 16;74(2):e20190693
pubmed: 33886828
Int Emerg Nurs. 2020 Nov;53:100830
pubmed: 32029416
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2019 Aug 12;32(7):1042-1054
pubmed: 31411093
BMJ Open. 2015 Apr 15;5(4):e006528
pubmed: 25877270
Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:373-96
pubmed: 23330698
J Nurs Care Qual. 2013 Oct-Dec;28(4):360-7
pubmed: 23475080
Nurs Crit Care. 2016 May;21(3):157-66
pubmed: 25269573
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 23;17(1):590
pubmed: 28830416
J Eval Clin Pract. 2017 Aug;23(4):853-859
pubmed: 28425580
J Perianesth Nurs. 2020 Dec;35(6):671-675
pubmed: 32682667
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 7;16(12):e0260926
pubmed: 34874957
J Crit Care. 2013 Feb;28(1):51-61
pubmed: 22762933
J Perianesth Nurs. 2021 Oct;36(5):499-506
pubmed: 34353723
Int Emerg Nurs. 2017 Jul;33:1-6
pubmed: 28476345
BMJ Qual Saf. 2013 Jan;22(1):32-41
pubmed: 22773888
Int Emerg Nurs. 2017 Jul;33:14-19
pubmed: 28256336
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 20;14(3):e0213055
pubmed: 30893337
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 03;18(5):
pubmed: 33802265
Australas Emerg Nurs J. 2017 May;20(2):92-97
pubmed: 28196705