Trainee Therapists' Perceptions of a Blended Intervention to Promote Resilience after a Natural Disaster: A Qualitative Case Study.
alliance
blended intervention
focus group
telemental health
thematic analysis
therapist
Journal
Journal of clinical medicine
ISSN: 2077-0383
Titre abrégé: J Clin Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101606588
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Jul 2022
27 Jul 2022
Historique:
received:
23
03
2022
revised:
22
06
2022
accepted:
18
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Natural disasters happen in an increased frequency, and telemental health interventions could offer easily accessible help to reduce mental health symptoms experienced by survivors. However, there are very few programs offered to natural disaster survivors, and no research exists on therapists' experiences with providing blended interventions for natural disaster survivors. Our qualitative case study aims to describe psychologists' experiences with an online, therapist-assisted blended intervention for survivors of the Fort McMurray wildfires in Alberta, Canada. The RESILIENT intervention was developed in the frames of a randomized controlled trial to promote resilience after the Fort McMurray wildfires by providing survivors free access to a 12-module, therapist-assisted intervention, aiming to improve post-traumatic stress, insomnia, and depression symptoms. A focus group design was used to collect data from the therapists, and emerging common themes were identified by thematic analysis. Therapists felt they could build strong alliances and communicate emotions and empathy effectively, although the lack of nonverbal cues posed some challenges. The intervention, according to participating therapists, was less suitable for participants in high-stress situations and in case of discrepancy between client expectations and the intervention content. Moreover, the therapists perceived specific interventions as easy-to-use or as more challenging based on their complexity and on the therapist support needed for executing them. Client engagement in the program emerged as an underlying theme that had fundamental impact on alliance, communication, and ultimately, treatment efficiency. Therapist training and supervision was perceived as crucial for the success of the program delivery. Our findings provided several implications for the optimalization of blended interventions for natural disaster survivors from our therapists' perspective.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Natural disasters happen in an increased frequency, and telemental health interventions could offer easily accessible help to reduce mental health symptoms experienced by survivors. However, there are very few programs offered to natural disaster survivors, and no research exists on therapists' experiences with providing blended interventions for natural disaster survivors.
AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Our qualitative case study aims to describe psychologists' experiences with an online, therapist-assisted blended intervention for survivors of the Fort McMurray wildfires in Alberta, Canada.
METHOD
METHODS
The RESILIENT intervention was developed in the frames of a randomized controlled trial to promote resilience after the Fort McMurray wildfires by providing survivors free access to a 12-module, therapist-assisted intervention, aiming to improve post-traumatic stress, insomnia, and depression symptoms. A focus group design was used to collect data from the therapists, and emerging common themes were identified by thematic analysis.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Therapists felt they could build strong alliances and communicate emotions and empathy effectively, although the lack of nonverbal cues posed some challenges. The intervention, according to participating therapists, was less suitable for participants in high-stress situations and in case of discrepancy between client expectations and the intervention content. Moreover, the therapists perceived specific interventions as easy-to-use or as more challenging based on their complexity and on the therapist support needed for executing them. Client engagement in the program emerged as an underlying theme that had fundamental impact on alliance, communication, and ultimately, treatment efficiency. Therapist training and supervision was perceived as crucial for the success of the program delivery.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings provided several implications for the optimalization of blended interventions for natural disaster survivors from our therapists' perspective.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35955982
pii: jcm11154361
doi: 10.3390/jcm11154361
pmc: PMC9369013
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
ID : 381288
Pays : Canada
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
S.B. is President and shareholder of Cliniques et Développement In Virtuo, a clinic that offers psychotherapy services and distributes virtual reality software. All of this is framed by the conflict of interest management policy of the Université du Québec en Outaouais. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Références
J Family Med Prim Care. 2019 Oct 31;8(10):3090-3095
pubmed: 31742125
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 21;11:2164
pubmed: 32973638
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2020 Jun;68(3):437-446
pubmed: 32589042
Internet Interv. 2017 Jan 25;8:1-9
pubmed: 30135823
Sante Ment Que. 2021 Spring;46(1):203-227
pubmed: 34597495
Behav Ther. 2013 Dec;44(4):614-24
pubmed: 24094787
J Anal Psychol. 2017 Jun;62(3):372-394
pubmed: 28504335
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 27;22(11):e20246
pubmed: 33151896
J Gen Psychol. 2013 Oct-Dec;140(4):282-93
pubmed: 24837821
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2018 Nov;25(6):797-808
pubmed: 30014606
JAMA. 2013 Aug 7;310(5):507-18
pubmed: 23925621
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Dec 14;14:355
pubmed: 25496393
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 15;19(9):e306
pubmed: 28916506
Fam Process. 2022 Mar;61(1):146-154
pubmed: 33861867
J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13
pubmed: 11556941
J Clin Psychol. 2020 Jun;76(6):1125-1134
pubmed: 30859573
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 May;36(3):206-14
pubmed: 19365725
Front Public Health. 2021 Nov 11;9:641151
pubmed: 34858911
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:591170
pubmed: 33192932
Front Public Health. 2021 May 04;9:655357
pubmed: 34017813
Cyberpsychol Behav. 2002 Apr;5(2):95-105
pubmed: 12025884
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(6):470-9
pubmed: 26090947
Sleep. 2011 May 01;34(5):601-8
pubmed: 21532953
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 23;17(21):
pubmed: 33114136
J Med Internet Res. 2012 Nov 14;14(6):e152
pubmed: 23151820
JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Feb 09;3(1):e9
pubmed: 26860537
Internet Interv. 2018 Jan 16;12:150-164
pubmed: 30135779
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2021 Nov;28(6):1403-1415
pubmed: 34723404