Comparison of Salt Iodization Requirements in National Standards with Global Guidelines.

WHO guidelines cretinism fortification requirements goiter iodine iodine deficiency mandatory fortification

Journal

Current developments in nutrition
ISSN: 2475-2991
Titre abrégé: Curr Dev Nutr
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101717957

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 14 02 2022
revised: 15 05 2022
accepted: 07 07 2022
entrez: 12 8 2022
pubmed: 13 8 2022
medline: 13 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Food fortification is the addition of 1 or more micronutrients to commonly consumed foods and is utilized by many countries as a public health intervention to prevent and control micronutrient deficiencies. As iodine deficiency was a major public health issue globally, the WHO developed evidence-based guidelines for the fortification of salt with iodine. The implementation of salt iodization has been highly successful in reducing iodine deficiency disorders worldwide and is recommended as the main strategy to prevent iodine deficiency. This analysis compared salt iodization requirements specified in countries' salt standards with WHO 2014 Guidelines on salt fortification. For countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation, data from the Global Fortification Data Exchange regarding iodine amounts and iodine compounds, to be added to salt per the country standard and corresponding national salt intake quantities, were compared with 2014 WHO Guidelines. As of 4 September 2021, 110 countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation had national salt standards that specified iodine amounts and compounds and salt intake data. All but 1 specified at least 1 recommended iodine compound, but the majority specified higher iodine amounts in salt standards than indicated in the guidelines, taking salt consumption levels into account. Our analysis did not find excess iodine intake as a result; however, we did not have data on the extent of compliance with national salt standards. Existing iodization requirements in salt standards appear to be appropriate for most countries. Countries in which iodine amounts in salt standards are significantly higher than those recommended in the 2014 Guidelines, in particular those with low compliance with national standards or excess iodine intake, may wish to review program process and output indicators and assess whether current iodine amounts in standards would result in excessive intake if implementation was improved.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Food fortification is the addition of 1 or more micronutrients to commonly consumed foods and is utilized by many countries as a public health intervention to prevent and control micronutrient deficiencies. As iodine deficiency was a major public health issue globally, the WHO developed evidence-based guidelines for the fortification of salt with iodine. The implementation of salt iodization has been highly successful in reducing iodine deficiency disorders worldwide and is recommended as the main strategy to prevent iodine deficiency.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
This analysis compared salt iodization requirements specified in countries' salt standards with WHO 2014 Guidelines on salt fortification.
Methods UNASSIGNED
For countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation, data from the Global Fortification Data Exchange regarding iodine amounts and iodine compounds, to be added to salt per the country standard and corresponding national salt intake quantities, were compared with 2014 WHO Guidelines.
Results UNASSIGNED
As of 4 September 2021, 110 countries with mandatory salt iodization legislation had national salt standards that specified iodine amounts and compounds and salt intake data. All but 1 specified at least 1 recommended iodine compound, but the majority specified higher iodine amounts in salt standards than indicated in the guidelines, taking salt consumption levels into account. Our analysis did not find excess iodine intake as a result; however, we did not have data on the extent of compliance with national salt standards.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Existing iodization requirements in salt standards appear to be appropriate for most countries. Countries in which iodine amounts in salt standards are significantly higher than those recommended in the 2014 Guidelines, in particular those with low compliance with national standards or excess iodine intake, may wish to review program process and output indicators and assess whether current iodine amounts in standards would result in excessive intake if implementation was improved.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35957741
doi: 10.1093/cdn/nzac116
pii: nzac116
pmc: PMC9362757
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

nzac116

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Nutrition.

Références

Lancet. 2008 Oct 4;372(9645):1251-62
pubmed: 18676011
J Trace Elem Med Biol. 2008;22(2):81-92
pubmed: 18565420
BMJ Open. 2013 Dec 23;3(12):e003733
pubmed: 24366578
Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66 Suppl 2:22-33
pubmed: 26045325
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 22;10(7):e0130247
pubmed: 26201031
J Nutr. 2014 Aug;144(8):1322S-1342S
pubmed: 24966410

Auteurs

Rachel Paige Greenwald (RP)

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Lana Childs (L)

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Helena Pachón (H)

Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Arnold Timmer (A)

Iodine Global Network, Ontario, Canada.

Robin Houston (R)

Iodine Global Network, Ontario, Canada.

Karen Codling (K)

Global Fortification Data Exchange, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Classifications MeSH