First-Trimester Sequential Screening for Preeclampsia Using Angiogenic Factors: Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Real Clinical Setting Study.
first trimester
growth restriction
preeclampsia
screening
sequential
Journal
Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine
ISSN: 2297-055X
Titre abrégé: Front Cardiovasc Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101653388
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
29
04
2022
accepted:
16
06
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The incidence of preeclampsia (PE) is about 2-8%, making it one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and maternal mortality in the world. Early prophylactic low dose administration (150 mg) of acetylsalicylic acid is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of early-onset PE, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), and neonatal mean stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Universal implementation of a first-trimester screening system including angiogenic and antiangiogenic markers [the Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) and/or soluble fms-like Tyrosine Kinase-1 (sFlt-1)] has shown a prediction rate of 90% for early-onset PE but entails a high financial cost. The aim of this study is to determine the predictive and preventive capacity of a universal PE first-trimester two-step sequential screening model, determining the PlGF only in patients previously classified as intermediate risk by means of a multivariate model based on resources already used in the standard pregnancy control, in a real clinical setting. We hypothesize that this screening model will achieve similar diagnostic performance as the universal determination of PlGF but at a lower economic cost. This is a prospective, multicentric, cohort study in a real-world clinical setting. Every singleton pregnancy will be recruited at the routine first pregnancy visit. In a first step, the first-trimester risk of PE will be calculated using a multivariate Gaussian distribution model, based on medical history, mean blood pressure, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein A (PAPP-A), and Uterine Artery Doppler Pulsatility Index (UTPI). Patients will be classified into three risk groups for PE: (1) risk ≥ 1/50, high-risk with no further testing (blinded PlGF); (2) risk between 1/51 and 1/500, medium-risk requiring further testing; and (3) risk ≤ 1/501, low-risk with no further testing. In a second step, the PlGF will only be determined in those patients classified as intermediate risk after this first step, and then reclassified into high- or low-risk groups. Prophylactic administration of aspirin (150 mg/day) will be prescribed only in high risk patients. As a secondary objective, sFlt-1 values will be blindly determined in patients with high and intermediate risk to assess its potential performance in the screening for PE. The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice. This study is approved by the Aragon Research Ethics Committee (CEICA) on 3 July 2020 (15/2020). ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04767438.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35958398
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.931943
pmc: PMC9361843
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04767438']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
931943Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Trilla, Luna, De León Socorro, Rodriguez, Ruiz-Romero, Mora Brugués, Benítez Delgado, Fabre, Martin Martínez, Ruiz-Martinez, Llurba and Oros.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Références
Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jul;132(1):254-256
pubmed: 29939936
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;218(6):612.e1-612.e6
pubmed: 29505771
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Aug;32(2):133-7
pubmed: 18615872
Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):e25-e27
pubmed: 26287789
Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004 Jul 05;2:53
pubmed: 15236649
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2012;31(3):141-6
pubmed: 22441437
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2019 Jun;98(6):700-707
pubmed: 30667052
Pregnancy Hypertens. 2018 Jul;13:291-310
pubmed: 29803330
Prenat Diagn. 2011 Jan;31(1):66-74
pubmed: 21210481
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1975 Sep;82(9):702-10
pubmed: 1182090
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Feb;208(2):130.e1-6
pubmed: 23159694
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jan;136(1):20-4
pubmed: 17287065
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Feb;220(2):197.e1-197.e11
pubmed: 30414394
Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Aug;116(2 Pt 1):402-414
pubmed: 20664402
N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-622
pubmed: 28657417
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;47(5):554-9
pubmed: 26643929
Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Aug;114(2 Pt 1):253-260
pubmed: 19622985
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):751-755
pubmed: 28067011
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Sep;48(3):333-9
pubmed: 26909664
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):287-293.e1
pubmed: 29138036
Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Oct;124(4):771-781
pubmed: 25198279
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Jun;51(6):743-750
pubmed: 29536574
Semin Perinatol. 2006 Feb;30(1):28-33
pubmed: 16549211
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Nov;50(5):551-556
pubmed: 28887883
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(2):94-102
pubmed: 25676660
Prenat Diagn. 2012 Jan;32(1):29-38
pubmed: 22234821
Semin Perinatol. 2009 Jun;33(3):130-7
pubmed: 19464502
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Mar;208(3):203.e1-203.e10
pubmed: 23246313
BMJ. 2007 Nov 10;335(7627):974
pubmed: 17975258