Bone marrow transplantation as a therapy for autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type 2 in mice.
bone marrow transplantation
bone phenotypes
chloride channel 7
osteoclasts
osteopetrosis
Journal
FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology
ISSN: 1530-6860
Titre abrégé: FASEB J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8804484
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
09 2022
09 2022
Historique:
revised:
01
07
2022
received:
04
05
2022
accepted:
14
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
16
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Autosomal dominant osteopetrosis type II (ADO2) is a heritable bone disease of impaired osteoclastic bone resorption caused by missense mutations in the chloride channel 7 (CLCN7) gene. Clinical features of ADO2 include fractures, osteomyelitis of jaw, vision loss, and in severe cases, bone marrow failure. Currently, there is no effective therapy for ADO2, and patients usually receive symptomatic treatments. Theoretically, bone marrow transplantation (BMT), which is commonly used in recessive osteopetrosis, could be used to treat ADO2, although the frequency of complications related to BMT is quite high. We created an ADO2 knock-in (p.G213R mutation) mouse model on the 129 genetic background, and their phenotypes mimic the human disease of ADO2. To test whether BMT could restore osteoclast function and rescue the bone phenotypes in ADO2 mice, we transplanted bone marrow cells from 6-8 weeks old male WT donor mice into recipient female ADO2 mice. Also, to determine whether age at the time of transplant may play a role in transplant success, we performed BMT in young (12-week-old) and old (9-month-old) ADO2 mice. Our data indicate that ADO2 mice transplanted with WT marrow achieved more than 90% engraftment up to 6 months post-transplantation at both young and old ages. The in-vivo DXA data revealed that young ADO2 mice transplanted with WT marrow had significantly lower whole body and spine areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at month 6 post-transplantation compared to the ADO2 control mice. The old ADO2 mice also displayed significantly lower whole body, femur, and spine aBMD at months 4 and 5 post-transplantation compared to the age-matched control mice. The in-vivo micro-CT data showed that ADO2 experimental mice transplanted with WT marrow had significantly lower BV/TV at months 2 and 4 post-transplantation compared to the ADO2 control mice at a young age. In contrast, ADO2 control and experimental mice displayed similar BV/TV values for all post-transplantation time points at old age. In addition, serum CTX was significantly higher at month 2 post-transplantation in both young and old ADO2 experimental mice compared to the ADO2 control mice. Serum P1NP levels in young ADO2 experimental mice were significantly higher at baseline and month 2 post-transplantation compared to the ADO2 control mice. These data suggest that BMT may provide, at least, some beneficial effect at both young and adult ages.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35959867
doi: 10.1096/fj.202200678R
pmc: PMC9397585
mid: NIHMS1830070
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
CLCN7 protein, human
0
Chloride Channels
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e22471Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR069583
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2022 Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.
Références
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2010 May;45(5):939-44
pubmed: 19802031
Medicine (Baltimore). 1968 Mar;47(2):149-67
pubmed: 4871758
J Pediatr. 1992 Jul;121(1):119-24
pubmed: 1320672
Cell. 2005 Jul 1;121(7):1109-21
pubmed: 15989959
J Bone Miner Res. 2015 Nov;30(11):2005-13
pubmed: 25943708
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2021 Jul 15;16(1):314
pubmed: 34266467
Bone. 2020 Jan;130:115144
pubmed: 31706050
J Transl Med. 2008 Feb 28;6:10
pubmed: 18307812
Nat Protoc. 2006;1(6):2979-87
pubmed: 17406558
Blood Adv. 2019 Mar 26;3(6):862-868
pubmed: 30885997
Bone. 2018 May;110:343-354
pubmed: 29501587
J Bone Miner Res. 2003 Aug;18(8):1513-8
pubmed: 12929941
Am J Pathol. 2004 May;164(5):1537-45
pubmed: 15111300
Bone. 2017 Apr;97:126-129
pubmed: 28095295
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2018 Jun;65(6):e27010
pubmed: 29469225
J Bone Miner Res. 2013 Jan;28(1):2-17
pubmed: 23197339
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jun 15;332(24):1594-9
pubmed: 7753137
Dis Model Mech. 2021 May 1;14(5):
pubmed: 33970241
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2003 Oct;32(7):657-63
pubmed: 13130312
Hum Mol Genet. 2001 Dec 1;10(25):2861-7
pubmed: 11741829
Arch Dis Child. 2010 Dec;95(12):984
pubmed: 20870624
Life Sci. 2016 May 1;152:244-8
pubmed: 26596563
Bone. 2014 Feb;59:66-75
pubmed: 24185277
Pediatr Clin North Am. 2010 Feb;57(1):171-80
pubmed: 20307717
Bone. 2000 Jan;26(1):87-93
pubmed: 10617161
J Immunol. 2002 Jan 15;168(2):635-42
pubmed: 11777956
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2007 Mar;92(3):771-8
pubmed: 17164308
N Engl J Med. 1984 Feb 16;310(7):409-15
pubmed: 6546410
Radiat Res. 1993 Oct;136(1):118-25
pubmed: 8210327
J Bone Miner Res. 2006 Jul;21(7):1089-97
pubmed: 16813529
J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Aug;34(8):1436-1445
pubmed: 30889272
Bone Marrow Transplant. 1998 Nov;22(10):941-6
pubmed: 9849690
Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2015 Sep 01;4:e248
pubmed: 26325626