Effects of decentralization on the functionality of health facility governing committees in lower and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review.
Effects
functionality
health facility governing committees
lower and middle-Income countries
systematic literature review
Journal
Global health action
ISSN: 1654-9880
Titre abrégé: Glob Health Action
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101496665
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
31 12 2022
31 12 2022
Historique:
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
17
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Health facility governing committees (HFGCs) were established by lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) to facilitate community participation at the primary facility level to improve health system performance. However, empirical evidence on their effects under decentralization reform on the functionality of HFGCs is scant and inconclusive. This article reviews the effects of decentralization on the functionality of HFGCs in LMICs. A systematic literature review was conducted using various search engines to obtain a total number of 24 relevant articles from 14 countries published between 2000 and 2020. Inclusion criteria include studies must be on community health committees, carried out under decentralization, HFGCs operating at the individual facility, effects of HFGCs on health performance or health outcomes and peer-reviewed empirical studies conducted in LMICs. The study has found varied functionality of HFGCs under a decentralization context. The study has found many HFGCs to have very low functionality, while a few HFGCs in other LMICs countries are performing very well. The context and decentralization type, members' awareness of their roles, membership allowance and availability of resource to the facility in which HFGCs operate to produce the desired outcomes play a significant role in facilitating/limiting them to effectively carry out the devolved duties and responsibilities. Fiscal decentralization has largely been seen as important in making health committees more autonomous, even though it does not guarantee the performance of HFGCs.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Health facility governing committees (HFGCs) were established by lower and middle-income countries (LMICs) to facilitate community participation at the primary facility level to improve health system performance. However, empirical evidence on their effects under decentralization reform on the functionality of HFGCs is scant and inconclusive.
OBJECTIVE
This article reviews the effects of decentralization on the functionality of HFGCs in LMICs.
METHODS
A systematic literature review was conducted using various search engines to obtain a total number of 24 relevant articles from 14 countries published between 2000 and 2020. Inclusion criteria include studies must be on community health committees, carried out under decentralization, HFGCs operating at the individual facility, effects of HFGCs on health performance or health outcomes and peer-reviewed empirical studies conducted in LMICs.
RESULTS
The study has found varied functionality of HFGCs under a decentralization context. The study has found many HFGCs to have very low functionality, while a few HFGCs in other LMICs countries are performing very well. The context and decentralization type, members' awareness of their roles, membership allowance and availability of resource to the facility in which HFGCs operate to produce the desired outcomes play a significant role in facilitating/limiting them to effectively carry out the devolved duties and responsibilities.
CONCLUSION
Fiscal decentralization has largely been seen as important in making health committees more autonomous, even though it does not guarantee the performance of HFGCs.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35960165
doi: 10.1080/16549716.2022.2074662
pmc: PMC9377249
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2074662Références
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1513-27
pubmed: 9823047
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Nov;265:113331
pubmed: 32905968
Int J Equity Health. 2017 Sep 15;16(1):151
pubmed: 28911325
Glob Health Action. 2015 Jun 01;8:26461
pubmed: 26037041
Health Policy Plan. 2004 Sep;19(5):279-91
pubmed: 15310663
Health Policy Plan. 2016 Mar;31(2):137-47
pubmed: 25920355
Health Policy Plan. 2012 Sep;27(6):449-66
pubmed: 22155589
PLoS Med. 2013;10(4):e1001419
pubmed: 23585737
J Public Health Med. 2002 Dec;24(4):246-51
pubmed: 12546199
Int J Public Health. 2017 Mar;62(2):219-229
pubmed: 27572495
Health Policy Plan. 2019 Oct 1;34(8):605-617
pubmed: 31378811
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 22;11:229
pubmed: 21936958
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2018 Sep;19(5):492-502
pubmed: 29374506
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jan 22;16:59
pubmed: 26795942
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Oct 10;13:404
pubmed: 24107094
PLoS One. 2017 Aug 24;12(8):e0182982
pubmed: 28837574
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 18;17(1):495
pubmed: 28720090
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017 Feb 27;6(7):365-376
pubmed: 28812832
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 1;20(1):112
pubmed: 33933078
BMJ Open. 2015 May 25;5(5):e006529
pubmed: 26009572
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Feb 9;18(1):104
pubmed: 29426314
Health Syst Reform. 2015 May 19;1(4):276-284
pubmed: 31519095
Health Policy. 2011 Mar;99(3):234-43
pubmed: 20888061
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 3;3(Suppl 3):e000681
pubmed: 30364368
Glob Health Action. 2018;11(1):1535031
pubmed: 30353792
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2016 Apr;31(2):E86-E104
pubmed: 26044888
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jun 13;17(1):403
pubmed: 28610626
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 8;14(8):e0220836
pubmed: 31393923
Indian J Community Med. 2018 Jul-Sep;43(3):148-152
pubmed: 30294077
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 2;19(1):279
pubmed: 31046748
Health Policy Plan. 2018 Jan 1;33(1):41-58
pubmed: 29077844
Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 20;2:76
pubmed: 24050381
Trop Med Int Health. 2012 May;17(5):674-82
pubmed: 22487362