Protocol for evaluating external facilitation as a strategy to nationally implement a novel stigma reduction training tool for healthcare providers.
Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Diversity training
External facilitation
Healthcare equity
Implementation climate
Influencing factors
Occupational justice
Occupational therapy
Stigma reduction
Theatre-based interventions
Journal
Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Aug 2022
12 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
10
03
2022
accepted:
25
07
2022
entrez:
12
8
2022
pubmed:
13
8
2022
medline:
13
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) is a theatre-based intervention for reducing healthcare provider stigma. IDEAS films are created by collecting narratives from people who have experienced discrimination and healthcare inequity, partnering with professional playwrights to create theatrical scripts that maintain the words of the narratives while arranging them into compelling storylines involving several interviews, and hiring professional actors to perform and record scenes. IDEAS implementation requires a moderator to establish a respectful learning environment, play the filmed performance, set ground rules for discussion, and moderate a discussion between healthcare providers who viewed the film and invited panelists who are members of the minoritized population being discussed. IDEAS' impact on provider stigma is measured via pre/post Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S) data collected from participating providers. The objectives of this manuscript are to provide narrative review of how provider stigma may lead to healthcare inequity and health disparities, describe the conceptual frameworks underpinning the IDEAS intervention, and outline methods for IDEAS implementation and implementation evaluation. This manuscript describes a hybrid type 3 design study protocol that uses the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate external facilitation, used as an implementation strategy to expand the reach of IDEAS. CFIR is also used to assess the impact of characteristics of the intervention and implementation climate on implementation success. Implementation success is defined by intervention feasibility and acceptability as well as self-efficacy of internal facilitators. This manuscript details the protocol for collection and evaluation of implementation data alongside that of effectiveness data. The manuscript provides new information about the use of configurational analysis, which uses Boolean algebra to analyze pathways to implementation success considering each variable, within and across diverse clinical sites across the USA. The significance of this protocol is that it outlines important information for future hybrid type 3 designs wishing to incorporate configurational analyses and/or studies using behavioral or atypical, complex, innovative interventions. The current lack of evidence supporting occupational justice-focused interventions and the strong evidence of stigma influencing health inequities underscore the necessity for the IDEAS intervention.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Identity Development Evolution and Sharing (IDEAS) is a theatre-based intervention for reducing healthcare provider stigma. IDEAS films are created by collecting narratives from people who have experienced discrimination and healthcare inequity, partnering with professional playwrights to create theatrical scripts that maintain the words of the narratives while arranging them into compelling storylines involving several interviews, and hiring professional actors to perform and record scenes. IDEAS implementation requires a moderator to establish a respectful learning environment, play the filmed performance, set ground rules for discussion, and moderate a discussion between healthcare providers who viewed the film and invited panelists who are members of the minoritized population being discussed. IDEAS' impact on provider stigma is measured via pre/post Acceptance and Action Questionnaire - Stigma (AAQ-S) data collected from participating providers. The objectives of this manuscript are to provide narrative review of how provider stigma may lead to healthcare inequity and health disparities, describe the conceptual frameworks underpinning the IDEAS intervention, and outline methods for IDEAS implementation and implementation evaluation.
METHODS
METHODS
This manuscript describes a hybrid type 3 design study protocol that uses the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to evaluate external facilitation, used as an implementation strategy to expand the reach of IDEAS. CFIR is also used to assess the impact of characteristics of the intervention and implementation climate on implementation success. Implementation success is defined by intervention feasibility and acceptability as well as self-efficacy of internal facilitators. This manuscript details the protocol for collection and evaluation of implementation data alongside that of effectiveness data. The manuscript provides new information about the use of configurational analysis, which uses Boolean algebra to analyze pathways to implementation success considering each variable, within and across diverse clinical sites across the USA.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The significance of this protocol is that it outlines important information for future hybrid type 3 designs wishing to incorporate configurational analyses and/or studies using behavioral or atypical, complex, innovative interventions. The current lack of evidence supporting occupational justice-focused interventions and the strong evidence of stigma influencing health inequities underscore the necessity for the IDEAS intervention.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35962426
doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00332-z
pii: 10.1186/s43058-022-00332-z
pmc: PMC9372956
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
88Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Group Process Intergroup Relat. 2016 Jul;19(4):528-542
pubmed: 27547105
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jan 11;2(1):5
pubmed: 33431063
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jan 28;1:CD011651
pubmed: 30687940
Acad Med. 2016 Mar;91(3):345-50
pubmed: 26200577
Implement Sci. 2020 Dec 11;15(1):108
pubmed: 33308250
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25
pubmed: 16300724
Gerontologist. 2020 Nov 23;60(8):1566-1574
pubmed: 32440672
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):815-822
pubmed: 33107003
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76
pubmed: 20957426
Psychiatry Res. 2020 Jan;283:112630
pubmed: 31722790
Acad Med. 2020 May;95(5):803-813
pubmed: 31567169
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Jul/Aug;74(4):7404347010p1-7404347010p7
pubmed: 32602456
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108
pubmed: 28851459
Am J Occup Ther. 2021 Jul 1;75(4):
pubmed: 34780605
Implement Sci Commun. 2020 Feb 25;1:25
pubmed: 32885184
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 13;14(8):e0220944
pubmed: 31408503
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Jul 05;14(7):
pubmed: 28678200
Circulation. 2015 Sep 1;132(9):873-98
pubmed: 26240271
Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Aug 1;74(Supplement_2):7412410010p1-7412410010p87
pubmed: 34780625
Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1453-1463
pubmed: 28402827
J Nurs Meas. 2003 Spring-Summer;11(1):29-40
pubmed: 15132010
Implement Sci. 2017 Feb 10;12(1):15
pubmed: 28187747
J Mix Methods Res. 2016 Jul;10(3):251-272
pubmed: 27429602
Psychol Sci. 2011 Jan;22(1):57-9
pubmed: 21106890
Annu Rev Public Health. 2019 Apr 1;40:423-442
pubmed: 30633710
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2020 Jul;114:108026
pubmed: 32527513
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2017 Oct;19(10):1015-1024
pubmed: 28856834
Inquiry. 2020 Jan-Dec;57:46958020976255
pubmed: 33300406
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014 Jan;3(1):21-26
pubmed: 25485230
Ann Fam Med. 2021 May-Jun;19(3):240-248
pubmed: 34180844
Soc Sci Med. 2018 Feb;199:219-229
pubmed: 28532892
Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2020 Jul;17(3):e12326
pubmed: 32030876