Sourcing of human peripheral blood-derived myeloid angiogenic cells under xeno-free conditions for the treatment of critical limb ischemia.
Blood-derived angiogenic cells
Critical limb ischemia
Mesenchymal stem cells
Myeloid angiogenic cells
Revascularization
Therapeutic angiogenesis
Xeno/serum free
Journal
Stem cell research & therapy
ISSN: 1757-6512
Titre abrégé: Stem Cell Res Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101527581
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
13 08 2022
13 08 2022
Historique:
received:
16
05
2022
accepted:
26
07
2022
entrez:
13
8
2022
pubmed:
14
8
2022
medline:
17
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease and exhibits a high risk of lower extremity amputations. As even the most promising experimental approaches based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrated only moderate therapeutic effects, we hypothesized that other cell types with intrinsic roles in angiogenesis may exhibit a stronger therapeutic potential. We have previously established a protocol to source human peripheral blood-derived angiogenic cells (BDACs). These cells promoted revascularization and took perivascular location at sites of angiogenesis, thus resembling hematopoietic pericytes, which were only described in vivo so far. We thus hypothesized that BDACs might have a superior ability to promote revascularization and rescue the affected limb in CLI. As standard BDAC sourcing techniques involve the use of animal-derived serum, we sought to establish a xeno- and/or serum-free protocol. Next, BDACs or MSCs were injected intramuscularly following the ligation of the iliac artery in a murine model. Their ability to enhance revascularization, impair necrosis and modulate inflammatory processes in the affected limb was investigated. Lastly, the secretomes of both cell types were compared to find potential indications for the observed differences in angiogenic potential. From the various commercial media tested, one xeno-free medium enabled the derivation of cells that resembled functional BDACs in comparable numbers. When applied to a murine model of CLI, both cell types enhanced limb reperfusion and reduced necrosis, with BDACs being twice as effective as MSCs. This was also reflected in histological evaluation, where BDAC-treated animals exhibited the least muscle tissue degeneration. The BDAC secretome was enriched in a larger number of proteins with pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting that the combination of those factors may be responsible for the superior therapeutic effect. Functional BDACs can be sourced under xeno-free conditions paving the way for their safe clinical application. Since BDACs are derived from an easily accessible and renewable tissue, can be sourced in clinically relevant numbers and time frame and exceeded traditional MSCs in their therapeutic potential, they may represent an advantageous cell type for the treatment of CLI and other ischemic diseases.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Critical limb ischemia (CLI) is the most severe form of peripheral artery disease and exhibits a high risk of lower extremity amputations. As even the most promising experimental approaches based on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) demonstrated only moderate therapeutic effects, we hypothesized that other cell types with intrinsic roles in angiogenesis may exhibit a stronger therapeutic potential. We have previously established a protocol to source human peripheral blood-derived angiogenic cells (BDACs). These cells promoted revascularization and took perivascular location at sites of angiogenesis, thus resembling hematopoietic pericytes, which were only described in vivo so far. We thus hypothesized that BDACs might have a superior ability to promote revascularization and rescue the affected limb in CLI.
METHODS
As standard BDAC sourcing techniques involve the use of animal-derived serum, we sought to establish a xeno- and/or serum-free protocol. Next, BDACs or MSCs were injected intramuscularly following the ligation of the iliac artery in a murine model. Their ability to enhance revascularization, impair necrosis and modulate inflammatory processes in the affected limb was investigated. Lastly, the secretomes of both cell types were compared to find potential indications for the observed differences in angiogenic potential.
RESULTS
From the various commercial media tested, one xeno-free medium enabled the derivation of cells that resembled functional BDACs in comparable numbers. When applied to a murine model of CLI, both cell types enhanced limb reperfusion and reduced necrosis, with BDACs being twice as effective as MSCs. This was also reflected in histological evaluation, where BDAC-treated animals exhibited the least muscle tissue degeneration. The BDAC secretome was enriched in a larger number of proteins with pro-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties, suggesting that the combination of those factors may be responsible for the superior therapeutic effect.
CONCLUSIONS
Functional BDACs can be sourced under xeno-free conditions paving the way for their safe clinical application. Since BDACs are derived from an easily accessible and renewable tissue, can be sourced in clinically relevant numbers and time frame and exceeded traditional MSCs in their therapeutic potential, they may represent an advantageous cell type for the treatment of CLI and other ischemic diseases.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35964057
doi: 10.1186/s13287-022-03095-5
pii: 10.1186/s13287-022-03095-5
pmc: PMC9375284
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
419Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Apr 27;9(1):117
pubmed: 29703251
J Leukoc Biol. 2016 Nov;100(5):979-984
pubmed: 27406995
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 20;7(1):3855
pubmed: 28634350
Blood. 2004 Oct 1;104(7):2084-6
pubmed: 15191949
NPJ Regen Med. 2019 Dec 2;4:22
pubmed: 31815001
Blood. 2010 Aug 5;116(5):829-40
pubmed: 20404134
Circ Res. 2021 Jun 11;128(12):1885-1912
pubmed: 34110904
Nat Rev Cancer. 2008 Aug;8(8):618-31
pubmed: 18633355
Nat Cell Biol. 2005 Sep;7(9):870-9
pubmed: 16113679
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;42 Suppl 2:S43-59
pubmed: 22172473
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1180:31-43
pubmed: 25015141
Science. 1997 Feb 14;275(5302):964-7
pubmed: 9020076
Dev Biol. 2017 Jul 1;427(1):6-11
pubmed: 28479340
Mol Ther. 2015 Mar;23(3):510-22
pubmed: 25582709
J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5 Suppl):18S-31S
pubmed: 20435259
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021 May 10;12(1):279
pubmed: 33971964
Pharmaceutics. 2022 Feb 09;14(2):
pubmed: 35214113
Ann Transl Med. 2014 Oct;2(10):97
pubmed: 25405151
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2000 Jun;49(3):152-6
pubmed: 10881694
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2020 Mar 6;11(1):106
pubmed: 32143690
Bioact Mater. 2022 Apr 02;17:526-541
pubmed: 35846945
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018 Apr 26;14:63-74
pubmed: 29731636
Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2011 Apr 30;63(4-5):277-90
pubmed: 21392551
J Cell Biol. 2001 Apr 30;153(3):543-53
pubmed: 11331305
Stem Cells. 2018 Feb;36(2):161-171
pubmed: 29226477
Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2018 May;38(4):777-782
pubmed: 28894964
Open Orthop J. 2011;5 Suppl 2:242-8
pubmed: 21886689
Dev Cell. 2011 Aug 16;21(2):193-215
pubmed: 21839917
J Phys Chem B. 2015 Mar 26;119(12):4350-8
pubmed: 25730613
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 07;7:41550
pubmed: 28169278
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2018;69(1-2):215-232
pubmed: 29758937
Cell Stem Cell. 2008 Sep 11;3(3):301-13
pubmed: 18786417
Cytotechnology. 2013 Oct;65(5):791-3
pubmed: 23975256
Vasc Med. 2015 Oct;20(5):465-78
pubmed: 26268268
Stem Cells Dev. 2013 Sep 1;22(17):2347-55
pubmed: 23600480
Transl Res. 2014 Apr;163(4):296-306
pubmed: 24530608
Circ Res. 2015 Apr 24;116(9):1509-26
pubmed: 25908725
Cell Rep. 2017 Mar 21;18(12):2991-3004
pubmed: 28329690
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2018 Nov 8;9(1):294
pubmed: 30409190
Hum Gene Ther. 2010 Sep;21(9):1045-56
pubmed: 20565251
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015 Jul 24;6:138
pubmed: 26204963
Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017 May;6(5):1316-1320
pubmed: 28296182
Adv Healthc Mater. 2021 Jun;10(11):e2100024
pubmed: 33890420
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005 Oct;46(10):3502-6
pubmed: 16186326
Cells. 2019 Sep 19;8(9):
pubmed: 31546913
Wound Repair Regen. 2016 Mar;24(2):204-14
pubmed: 26969517
Int J Mol Sci. 2018 Sep 25;19(10):
pubmed: 30257508
Int J Mol Sci. 2020 Nov 26;21(23):
pubmed: 33256237
Nat Commun. 2017 Oct 16;8(1):952
pubmed: 29038527