Possible limits of calibrating reading charts with the Landolt ring: a microscopic study.
Landolt rings
Near vision charts
Near visual acuity
Print quality
Reading acuity
Sizes of optotypes
Journal
Eye and vision (London, England)
ISSN: 2326-0254
Titre abrégé: Eye Vis (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101664982
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 Aug 2022
15 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
18
02
2022
accepted:
25
07
2022
entrez:
14
8
2022
pubmed:
15
8
2022
medline:
15
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate microscopically whether the print quality and accuracy of sizing of Landolt ring near vision charts are adequate for the calibration of reading charts. Near vision charts with Landolt rings from Oculus GmbH (C-Test; Wetzlar, Germany), Precision Vision (Woodstock, IL) and the RADNER Charts were examined, as well as custom-made Landolt rings optimized for print quality. Microscopic investigations and measurements were performed by using a Huvitz HSZ 600 stereomicroscope (Nikon NIS Elements software) to evaluate the height of the Landolt rings, the thickness of the lines, and the width of the openings. The deviations from the mathematically correct values, which were calculated as given in the EN/ISO 8596 and by the International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO), were analyzed (calculated for a test distance of 40 cm). All the near vision charts showed notable deficiencies in print quality and aberrations from the nominal values in the height, thickness of the lines, and width of the openings. The openings were too narrow, whereas the height and thickness of the lines were larger than the nominal values. Even the openings of Landolt rings optimized for print quality were not always within an acceptable 5% tolerance and need further improvement. This study reports inaccuracies in the heights, thicknesses of the lines, and widths of the openings of Landolt rings in all the near vision charts investigated. The extent of these inaccuracies excludes such near vision charts as reference tests for the calibration of reading charts. The x-height in relation to the visual angle still seems to be the most reliable method for standardizing the print sizes for reading charts.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35965343
doi: 10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5
pii: 10.1186/s40662-022-00302-5
pmc: PMC9377069
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
31Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eye Vis (Lond). 2016 Nov 10;3:29
pubmed: 27844022
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Apr;224:66-73
pubmed: 33309696
Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Jan - Feb;64(1):90-100
pubmed: 30189234
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006 Feb;244(2):154-62
pubmed: 16047185
Optom Vis Sci. 2019 Oct;96(10):768-779
pubmed: 31592960
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017 Aug;255(8):1465-1482
pubmed: 28411305
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1992 Mar;33(3):677-87
pubmed: 1544792
Br J Ophthalmol. 2019 Oct;103(10):1518-1523
pubmed: 30573497
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Dec;243(12):1228-35
pubmed: 16003512