Risk Factors for Carotid Restenosis in Patients After Eversion Endarterectomy vs Stenting: A Single-Center Experience.
carotid restenosis
carotid stenting
eversion endarterectomy
risk factors
Journal
Angiology
ISSN: 1940-1574
Titre abrégé: Angiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0203706
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2023
04 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
16
8
2022
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
15
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The primary aim of the presented study is to analyze and compare the rate of carotid restenosis in patients after eversion carotid endarterectomy (eCEA), primary carotid angioplasty and stenting (CASp), and stenting for carotid artery restenosis after previous eCEA (CASr). The secondary aim is to compare clinical outcomes in patients with carotid restenosis. The total number of patients with evident carotid restenosis was 223 (24.8%). In patients with eCEA, significant carotid restenosis rate was 12.7%, in the CASp group 18.7%, and CASr 6.7%. Patients with carotid restenosis were asymptomatic in 95.1% of cases. Patients in the CASp group experienced transient ischemic attack more than patients with eCEA (
Identifiants
pubmed: 35968755
doi: 10.1177/00033197221121005
doi:
Substances chimiques
Cholesterol, HDL
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
317-324Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn