Is Parental Presence in the Ambulance Associated With Parental Satisfaction During Emergency Pediatric Intensive Care Retrieval? A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.


Journal

Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
ISSN: 1529-7535
Titre abrégé: Pediatr Crit Care Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100954653

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 09 2022
Historique:
pubmed: 16 8 2022
medline: 9 9 2022
entrez: 15 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Quality standards for pediatric intensive care transport services in the U.K. state that at least one parent should be allowed to travel with their child during emergency transport to a PICU. We aimed to identify the reasons why parents do, or do not, accompany their child and whether there is an association between parental presence in the ambulance and their satisfaction with the transport. National cross-sectional parent questionnaire. Pediatric Critical Care Transport (PCCT) teams and PICUs in England and Wales. Parents of children transferred to one of 24 participating PICUs between January 2018 and January 2019. None. A parent feedback questionnaire was completed by parents whose child received an emergency interhospital transfer. As part of the questionnaire, a brief nine-item scale was developed to summarize parental transport experience (ranging from 1 to 5). The association between parental presence in the ambulance and parental experience was analyzed. A total of 4,558 children were transported during the study. Consent was obtained from 2,838 parents, and questionnaires received in 2,084 unique transports (response rate: 45.7%). In 1,563 transports (75%), at least one parent traveled in the ambulance. Parents did not travel in 478 transports (23%) and, in most instances (442 transports; 93%), offered reasons (emotional, practical, and health-related) for declining to travel or explanations why they were not permitted to travel (mainly due to space restrictions). Most parents rated their experience with the retrieval teams very highly, and within this context, we found evidence of greater variability in experience ratings if parents were not present in the ambulance and if this was not their choice. Most parents who completed questionnaires rated their experience with their PCCT team highly. Parental presence and choice to travel in the ambulance were associated with a more positive experience.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35969657
doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002995
pii: 00130478-202209000-00005
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

708-716

Subventions

Organisme : Department of Health
ID : 15/136/45
Pays : United Kingdom

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Drs. Evans’s, Barber’s, and Seaton’s institutions received funding from the National Institute of Health Research (NIHR). Dr. Seaton received funding from the NIHR; she received support for article research from the NIHR. Dr. Wray’s institution received funding from the NIHR Health Services and Delivery Research programme (Project No.: 15/136/45). The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Références

Paediatric Intensive Care Audit (PICANet) 2019. Annual Report. 2019. Available at: https://www.picanet.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/25/2019/12/PICANet-2019-Annual-Report-Summary_v1.0.pdf . Accessed November 5, 2021
Ramnarayan P, Polke E: The state of paediatric intensive care retrieval in Britain. Arch Dis Child 2012; 97:145–149
Ramnarayan P, Thiru K, Parslow RC, et al.: Effect of specialist retrieval teams on outcomes in children admitted to paediatric intensive care units in England and Wales: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2010; 376:698–704
Paediatric Critical Care Society: PCCS Standards. 1991. Available at: https://pccsociety.uk/about-pccs/pics-standards/ . Accessed November 5, 2021
Tasker RC: Inter-hospital transport for children and their parent(s). Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:1217–1218
Davies J, Tibby SM, Murdoch IA: Should parents accompany critically ill children during inter-hospital transport? Arch Dis Child 2005; 90:1270–1273
Ramnarayan P, Evans R, Draper ES, et al.; DEPICT Study Investigators: Differences in access to emergency paediatric intensive care and care during transport (DEPICT): Study protocol for a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e028000
Ramnarayan P, Dimitriades K, Freeburn L, et al.; United Kingdom Paediatric Intensive Care Society Acute Transport Group: Interhospital transport of critically ill children to PICUs in the United Kingdom and republic of Ireland: Analysis of an international dataset. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2018; 19:e300–e311
Evans REC, Barber V, Seaton S, et al.: Development of a parent experience measure for paediatric critical care transport teams. Nurs Crit Care 2022; 27:367–374
Neuendorf KA: The Content Analysis Guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage, 2017
Braun V, Clarke V: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006; 3:77–101
Landis JR, Koch GG: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33:159–174
Colville G, Orr F, Gracey D: “The worst journey of our lives”: Parents’ experiences of a specialised paediatric retrieval service. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2003; 19:103–108
Joyce CN, Libertin R, Bigham MT: Family-centered care in pediatric critical care transport. Air Med J 2015; 34:32–36
Woodward GA, Fleegler EW: Should parents accompany pediatric interfacility ground ambulance transports? The parent’s perspective. Pediatr Emerg Care 2000; 16:383–390

Auteurs

Ruth E C Evans (REC)

Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Victoria Barber (V)

Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Sarah Seaton (S)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Leicester, United Kingdom.

Padmanabhan Ramnarayan (P)

Children's Acute Transport Service (CATS), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Anaesthetics, Pain Medicine and Intensive Care (APMIC) Section, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Patrick Davies (P)

Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Trust Headquarters, City Hospital Campus, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Jo Wray (J)

Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH