Association of Self-Reported Coping Strategies With Speech Recognition Outcomes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.
Journal
Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology
ISSN: 1537-4505
Titre abrégé: Otol Neurotol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100961504
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
8
2022
pubmed:
16
8
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To characterize the degree to which individual coping strategies may influence speech perception after cochlear implantation. Retrospective cohort study. Tertiary referral center. Adult, postlingually deaf cochlear implant recipients. The Coping Orientation to Problems Experience inventory, a validated, multidimensional self-reported coping scale, was administered preoperatively. Speech perception was measured using consonant-nucleus-consonant (CNC) phoneme and word scores, AzBio sentence accuracy in quiet and noise, and Hearing in Noise Test sentences in quiet preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Quality of life was measured with the Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Thirty-six patients were included in this study. Mean age at surgery was 70.7 ± 11.4 years. Acceptance was associated with a decreased AzBio in noise score in the 6 months after CI (regression coefficient b = -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.07 to -0.03; p < 0.01). Denial was associated with a decreased AzBio in quiet score (b = -0.05; 95% CI, -0.09 to -0.01; p < 0.05), whereas humor was associated with an increased AzBio in quiet score (b = 0.02; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.04; p < 0.05). Humor was also associated with an increased Hearing in Noise Test score (b = 0.05; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.07; p < 0.05). Denial was associated with decreased CNC word (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.02; p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = -0.04; 95% CI, -0.07 to -0.02; p < 0.01) scores, whereas substance use was associated with increased CNC word (b = 0.03; 95% CI, 0.01 to 0.05, p < 0.01) and phoneme (b = 0.04; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.06; p < 0.01) scores. Scores on self-reported quality of life measures were not significantly correlated with coping strategies. A variety of adaptive and maladaptive coping strategies are used by postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant users. Denial and acceptance may be more predictive of poor speech performance, whereas humor and substance use may be more predictive of improved speech performance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35970167
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000003621
pii: 00129492-202209000-00037
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e888-e894Subventions
Organisme : NIDCD NIH HHS
ID : R21 DC018871
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022, Otology & Neurotology, Inc.
Références
Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB, et al. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 2013;34:342–60.
Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ. Assessment of spectral and temporal resolution in cochlear implant users using psychoacoustic discrimination and speech cue categorization. Ear Hear 2016;37:e377–90.
Neben N, Buechner A, Schuessler M, Lenarz T. Outcome evaluation on cochlear implant users with residual hearing. Cochlear Implants Int 2018;19:88–99.
Lazard DS, Vincent C, Venail F, et al. Pre-, per- and postoperative factors affecting performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: A new conceptual model over time. PLoS One 2012;7:e48739. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048739.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048739
Lazard DS, Lee HJ, Gaebler M, et al. Phonological processing in post-lingual deafness and cochlear implant outcome. Neuroimage 2010;49:3443–51.
Giraud AL, Lee HJ. Predicting cochlear implant outcome from brain organisation in the deaf. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007;25(3–4):381–90.
Strelnikov K, Rouger J, Demonet JF, et al. Does brain activity at rest reflect adaptive strategies? Evidence from speech processing after cochlear implantation. Cereb Cortex 2010;20:1217–22.
Lazarus R. Psychological Stress and the Coping Process . New York, NY: McGraw-Hill; 1966.
Lazarus R, Folkman S. Stress, Appraisal and Coping . New York, NY: Springer; 1984.
Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 1989;56:267–83.
Corallo F, Bonanno L, Di Cara M, et al. Therapeutic adherence and coping strategies in patients with multiple sclerosis: An observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e16532.
Greer JA, Applebaum AJ, Jacobsen JC, Temel JS, Jackson VA. Understanding and addressing the role of coping in palliative care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 2020;38:915–25.
Jaser SS, White LE. Coping and resilience in adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Child Care Health Dev 2011;37:335–42.
Temoshok LR, Wald RL, Synowski S, Garzino-Demo A. Coping as a multisystem construct associated with pathways mediating HIV-relevant immune function and disease progression. Psychosom Med 2008;70:555–61.
Freeman EE, Lesk MR, Harasymowycz P, et al. Maladaptive coping strategies and glaucoma progression. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4761.
Peterson GE, Lehiste I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord 1962;27:62–70.
Spahr AJ, Dorman MF, Litvak LM, et al. Development and validation of the AzBio sentence lists. Ear Hear 2012;33:112–7.
Nilsson M, Soli SD, Sullivan JA. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;95:1085–99.
Amann E, Anderson I. Development and validation of a questionnaire for hearing implant users to self-assess their auditory abilities in everyday communication situations: The Hearing Implant Sound Quality Index (HISQUI19). Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2014;134:915–23.
Hinderink JB, Krabbe PF, Van Den Broek P. Development and application of a health-related quality-of-life instrument for adults with cochlear implants: The Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2000;123:756–65.
Kobosko J, Pankowska A, Skarżyński H. Coping strategies in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant users in comparison to the hearing population. Otolaryngol Pol 2012;66:132–7.
Carver CS. You want to measure coping but your protocol's too long: Consider the brief COPE. Int J Behav Med 1997;4:92–100.
Kobosko J, Jedrzejczak WW, Pilka E, Pankowska A, Skarzynski H. Satisfaction with cochlear implants in postlingually deaf adults and its nonaudiological predictors: Psychological distress, coping strategies, and self-esteem. Ear Hear 2015;36:605–18.
Anderson CJ, Vogel LC, Chlan KM, Betz RR. Coping with spinal cord injury: Strategies used by adults who sustained their injuries as children or adolescents. J Spinal Cord Med 2008;31:290–6.
Braniecka A, Hanć M, Wołkowicz I, et al. Is it worth turning a trigger into a joke? Humor as an emotion regulation strategy in remitted depression. Brain Behav 2019;9:e01213.
Marziali E, McDonald L, Donahue P. The role of coping humor in the physical and mental health of older adults. Aging Ment Health 2008;12:713–8.
Işik Ulusoy S, Kal Ö. Relationship among coping strategies, quality of life, and anxiety and depressive disorders in hemodialysis patients. Ther Apher Dial 2020;24:189–96.
Mc Hugh R, Mc Feeters D, Boyda D, O'Neill S. Coping styles in adults with cystic fibrosis: Implications for emotional and social quality of life. Psychol Health Med 2016;21:102–12.
Kołtuniuk A, Kazimierska-Zając M, Cisek K, Chojdak-Łukasiewicz J. The role of stress perception and coping with stress and the quality of life among multiple sclerosis patients. Psychol Res Behav Manag 2021;14:805–15.
Hasking PA, Oei TP. Confirmatory factor analysis of the COPE questionnaire on community drinkers and an alcohol-dependent sample. J Stud Alcohol 2002;63:631–40.
Data on Excessive Drinking | CDC. Published September 3, 2020. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/alcohol/data-stats.htm . Accessed July 5, 2021.
Ramos SD, Kelly M, Schepis T. Substance use in healthcare workers: Importance of stress perception, smoking temptation, social support, and humor. Subst Use Misuse 2018;53:837–43.
Harris MS, Capretta NR, Henning SC, et al. Postoperative rehabilitation strategies used by adults with cochlear implants: A pilot study. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2016;1:42–8.
Klop WM, Boermans PP, Ferrier MB, et al. Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:615–21.
Straatman LV, Huinck WJ, Langereis MC, Snik AF, Mulder JJ. Cochlear implantation in late-implanted prelingually deafened adults: Changes in quality of life. Otol Neurotol 2014;35:253–9.
Calvino M, Gavilán J, Sánchez-Cuadrado I, et al. Using the HISQUI29 to assess the sound quality levels of Spanish adults with unilateral cochlear implants and no contralateral hearing. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:2343–53.
Mertens G, Kleine Punte A, De Bodt M, Van de Heyning P. Sound quality in adult cochlear implant recipients using the HISQUI19. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2015;135:1138–45.
Volleth N, Hast A, Lehmann EK, Hoppe U. Subjective improvement of hearing through cochlear implantation. HNO 2018;66:613–20.