Technologies used to facilitate remote rehabilitation of adults with deconditioning, musculoskeletal conditions, stroke, or traumatic brain injury: an umbrella review.
Journal
JBI evidence synthesis
ISSN: 2689-8381
Titre abrégé: JBI Evid Synth
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101764819
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
15
8
2022
pubmed:
16
8
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The objective of this review was to provide an overview of technologies (devices, tools, or software applications) used to facilitate remote rehabilitation of adults with deconditioning, musculoskeletal conditions, stroke, or traumatic brain injury, and to summarize the quantitative evidence of their efficacy. Health care providers are considering how to meet longer-term rehabilitation needs of people whose health or level of activity and participation has been impacted directly or indirectly by the COVID-19 pandemic. Demands on rehabilitation services are increasing, driving a need for more services to be delivered in homes and communities. This review will identify the effectiveness of health care technologies to facilitate remote rehabilitation. This review included quantitative systematic reviews where participants were adults requiring rehabilitation for musculoskeletal conditions, stroke, or traumatic brain injury, or older adults requiring rehabilitation for deconditioning. Interventions included a technology and focused on recovery or rehabilitation with one of the following primary outcomes: physical activity levels, balance and/or gait, physical performance (mobility), or functional performance. Secondary outcomes included levels of pain, cognitive function, health-related quality of life, and adverse effects. Five databases were searched from 2016 to 2020 to identify English-language publications. Critical appraisal of five systematic reviews was conducted independently by two reviewers. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. Data were summarized using a tabular format with supporting text. Despite the large number of systematic reviews found in the initial search, only five met the inclusion criteria. Of these, each explored a different technology, including wearable activity trackers, computer-based activities, non-immersive virtual reality, mobile apps, web-based rehabilitation interventions, and electronic health-based interventions (web-based or app-based with a wearable activity tracker). Computer-based activities were beneficial for improving cognitive function but showed no benefit on quality of life in post-stroke rehabilitation. Interventions that included wearable activity trackers showed mixed findings for increasing levels of physical activity for community-dwelling older adults with deconditioning. Mobile apps were beneficial for increasing levels of physical activity and physical or functional performance for post-stroke rehabilitation. Web-based rehabilitation that contained a variety of components to support home exercise was not effective in improving physical performance or QoL, reducing pain, or increasing levels of physical activity among individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Electronic health-based interventions (web-based or app-based with a wearable activity tracker) were effective in improving physical performance and reducing pain in individuals with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip. Therapy in the form of screen-based, non-immersive virtual reality could be successfully transferred to the home environment for improving the balance/gait of individuals with stroke. The small number of heterogeneous systematic reviews included in this umbrella review and the very low quality of evidence, mostly from single small primary studies, make it difficult to draw overall conclusions that differ from the original review findings. This highlights a paucity of strong, high-quality evidence underpinning technologies that can be used to facilitate remote rehabilitation in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35971198
doi: 10.11124/JBIES-21-00241
pii: 02174543-202208000-00003
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1927-1968Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 JBI.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
JC is a senior associate editor for JBI Evidence Synthesis, and was not involved in the editorial processing of the manuscript. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Références
De Biase S, Cook L, Skelton DA, Witham M, Ten Hove R. The COVID-19 rehabilitation pandemic. Age Ageing 2020;49 (5):696–700.
de Sire A, Andrenelli E, Negrini F, Patrini M, Lazzarini SG, Ceravolo MG. Rehabilitation and COVID-19: A rapid living systematic review by Cochrane Rehabilitation Field updated as of December 31st, 2020 and synthesis of the scientific literature of 2020. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2021;57 (2):181–188.
Wise J. Long covid: WHO calls on countries to offer patients more rehabilitation. BMJ 2021;372:n405.
Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, McGroder C, Stevens JS, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med 2021;27 (4):601–615.
Walle-Hansen MM, Ranhoff AH, Mellingsæter M, Wang-Hansen MS, Myrstad M. Health-related quality of life, functional decline, and longterm mortality in older patients following hospitalisation due to COVID-19. BMC Geriatr 2021;21 (1):199.
Olezene CS, Hansen E, Steere HK, Giacino JT, Polich GR, Borg-Stein J, et al. Functional outcomes in the inpatient rehabilitation setting following severe COVID-19 infection. PLOS ONE 2021;16 (3):e0248824.
Wade DT. Rehabilitation after COVID-19: an evidence-based approach. Clin Med 2020;20 (4):359–365.
Bearne LM, Gregory WJ, Hurley MV. Remotely delivered physiotherapy: can we capture the benefits beyond COVID-19? Rheumatol Oxf Engl 2021;60 (4):1582–1584.
Horton T, Hardie T, Mahadeva S, Warburton W. Securing a positive health care technology legacy from COVID-19 [internet]. The Health Foundation; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 19]. Available from: https://www.health.org.uk/publications/long-reads/securing-a-positive-health-care-technology-legacy-from-covid-19 .
Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face to face patient care: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD002098.
Flodgren G, Rachas A, Farmer AJ, Inzitari M, Shepperd S. Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; (9):CD002098.
Malhotra P, Singh Y, Anand P, Bangotra DK, Singh PK, Hong W-C. Internet of things: evolution, concerns and security challenges. Sensors 2021;21 (5):1809.
Jovanov E. Wearables Meet IoT: Synergistic Personal Area Networks (SPANs). Sensors 2019;19 (19):425.
Sharma A, Badea M, Tiwari S, Marty JL. Wearable biosensors: an alternative and practical approach in healthcare and disease monitoring. Mol Basel Switz 2021;26 (3):748.
Del Din S, Kirk C, Yarnall AJ, Rochester L, Hausdorff JM. Body-worn sensors for remote monitoring of Parkinson's disease motor symptoms: vision, state of the art, and challenges ahead. J Park Dis 2021;1 (s1):S35–47.
Nascimento LMSD, Bonfati LV, Freitas MB, Mendes Junior JJA, Siqueira HV, Stevan SL Jr. Sensors and systems for physical rehabilitation and health monitoring: a review. Sensors 2020;20 (15):22.
Sardi L, Idri A, Fernández-Alemán JL. A systematic review of gamification in e-Health. J Biomed Inform 2017;71:31–48.
Koutsiana E, Ladakis I, Fotopoulos D, Chytas A, Kilintzis V, Chouvarda I. Serious gaming technology in upper extremity rehabilitation: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games 2020;8 (4):e19071.
Steiner B, Elgert L, Saalfeld B, Wolf KH. Gamification in rehabilitation of patients with musculoskeletal diseases of the shoulder: scoping review. JMIR Serious Games 2020;8 (3):e19914.
de Joode EA, van Boxtel MP, Verhey FR, van Heugten CM. Use of assistive technology in cognitive rehabilitation: exploratory studies of the opinions and expectations of healthcare professionals and potential users. Brain Inj 2012;26 (10):1257–1266.
Khalid S, Alnajjar F, Gochoo M, Renawi A, Shimoda S. Robotic assistive and rehabilitation devices leading to motor recovery in upper limb: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2021; 1–15. Online ahead of print.
Jiménez-Muñoz L, Gutiérrez-Rojas L, Porras-Segovia A, Courtet P, Baca-García E. Mobile applications for the management of chronic physical conditions: a systematic review. Intern Med J 2022;52 (1):21–29.
Gonçalves-Bradley DC, J. Maria AR, Ricci-Cabello I, Villanueva G, Fønhus MS, Glenton C, et al. Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2020;9:CD012927.
Eysenbach G. Telerehabilitation: Review of the state-of-the-art and areas of application. JIMR Rehabil Assist Technol 2017;4 (2):e7.
TEC Cymru. TEC Cymru evaluation reports [internet]. Digital Health Wales; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 19] Available from: https://digitalhealth.wales/tec-cymru/how-we-canhelp/evidence/eval-reports .
Liu S, Zhao Q, Li W, Zhao X, Li K. The effectiveness of a wearable activity tracker (WAT)-based intervention to improve physical activity levels in sedentary older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 2020;91:104211.
Zhou X, Du M, Zhou L. Use of mobile applications in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2018;25 (7):489–499.
Chen Y, Abel KT, Janecek JT, Chen Y, Zheng K, Cramer SC. Home-based technologies for stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Int J Med Inf 2019;123 (3):11–22.
Direito A, Carraça E, Rawstorn J, Whittaker R, Maddison R. mHealth technologies to influence physical activity and sedentary behaviors: behavior change techniques, systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Behav Med 2017;51 (2):226–239.
Jansson MM, Rantala A, Miettunen J, Puhto AP, Pikkarainen M. The effects and safety of telerehabilitation in patients with lower-limb joint replacement: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. J Telemed Telecare 2020; 1357633X20917868. Online ahead of print.
Welsh Government. Rehabilitation: a framework for continuity and recovery 2020 to 2021 [internet]. Welsh Government; 2021 [cited 2021 Apr 19]. Available from: https://gov.wales/rehabilitation-framework-continuity-and-recovery-2020-2021-html .
Guan W-J, Zheng-yi Ni, Hu Y, Liang W-H, Ou C-Q, He J-X. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med 2020;382 (18):1708–1720.
Batur EB, Korez MK, Gezer IA, Levendoglu F, Ural O. Musculoskeletal symptoms and relationship with laboratory findings in patients with COVID-19. Int J Clin Pract 2021;75 (6):e14135.
Carr A, Smith JA, Camaradou J, Prieto-Alhambra D. Growing backlog of planned surgery due to covid-19. BMJ 2021;372:n339.
Jain A, Jain P, Aggarwal S. SARS-CoV-2 Impact on elective orthopaedic surgery: implications for post-pandemic recovery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020;102 (13):e68.
Chatterji G, Patel Y, Jain V, Geevarughese NM, Haq RU. Impact of COVID-19 on Orthopaedic care and practice: a rapid review. Indian J Orthop 2021;55 (4):839–852.
Wang CC, Chao JK, Wang ML, Yang YP, Chien CS, Lai WY, et al. Care for patients with stroke during the covid-19 pandemic: physical therapy and rehabilitation suggestions for preventing secondary stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;29 (11):105182.
Iodice F, Romoli M, Giometto B, Clerico M, Tedeschi G, Bonavita S, et al. Stroke and digital technology: a wake-up call from COVID-19 pandemic. Neurol Sci 2021;42 (3):805–809.
Padmanabhan N, Natarajan I, Gunston R, Raseta M, Roffe C. Impact of COVID-19 on stroke admissions, treatments, and outcomes at a comprehensive stroke centre in the United Kingdom. Neurol Sci 2021;42 (1):15–20.
Venketasubramanian N, Anderson C, Ay H, Aybek S, Brinjikji W, de Freitas GR, et al. Stroke care during the COVID-19 pandemic: International expert panel review. Cerebrovasc Dis 2021;50 (3):245–261.
Rubiano AM, Carney N, Chesnut R, Puyana JC. Global neurotrauma research challenges and opportunities. Nature 2015;527 (7578):S193–S197.
Gray M, Bird W. Covid-19 will be followed by a deconditioning pandemic [internet]. BMJ Opinion; 2020 [cited 2021 Apr 19]. Available from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/06/15/covid-19-will-be-followed-by-a-deconditioning-pandemic/ .
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, Holly C, Khalil H, Tungpunkom P. Chapter 10: Umbrella reviews. In: Aromataris E, Munn Z, editors. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis [internet]. JBI; 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 31]. Available from: https://synthesismanual.jbi.global .
Moher D, Liberati A, Telzlaff J, Altman DG. The PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151 (4):264–269.
Aromataris E, Fernandez R, Godfrey C, et al. Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015;13 (3):132–140.
Schafer AGM, Zalpour C, von Piekartz H, Hall TM, Paelke V. The efficacy of electronic health-supported home exercise interventions for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee: systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2018;20 (4):e152.
Srikesavan C, Bryer C, Ali U, Williamson E. Web-based rehabilitation interventions for people with rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2019;25 (5):263–275.
Schröder J, van Criekinge T, Embrechts E, Celis X, Van Schuppen J, Truijen S. Combining the benefits of tele-rehabilitation and virtual reality-based balance training: a systematic review on feasibility and effectiveness. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2019;14 (1):2–11.
O’Cathain A, Croot L, Duncan E, Rousseau N, Sworn K, Turner KM, et al. Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare. BMJ Open 2019;9 (8):e029954.