Robot-Assisted Deep Brain Stimulation: High Accuracy and Streamlined Workflow.
Journal
Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)
ISSN: 2332-4260
Titre abrégé: Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101635417
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 09 2022
01 09 2022
Historique:
received:
09
12
2021
accepted:
03
04
2022
entrez:
16
8
2022
pubmed:
17
8
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
A number of stereotactic platforms are available for performing deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead implantation. Robot-assisted stereotaxy has emerged more recently demonstrating comparable accuracy and shorter operating room times compared with conventional frame-based systems. To compare the accuracy of our streamlined robotic DBS workflow with data in the literature from frame-based and frameless systems. We retrospectively reviewed 126 consecutive DBS lead placement procedures using a robotic stereotactic platform. Indications included Parkinson disease (n = 94), essential tremor (n = 21), obsessive compulsive disorder (n = 7), and dystonia (n = 4). Procedures were performed using a stereotactic frame for fixation and the frame pins as skull fiducials for robot registration. We used intraoperative fluoroscopic computed tomography for registration and postplacement verification. The mean radial error for the target point was 1.06 mm (SD: 0.55 mm, range 0.04-2.80 mm) on intraoperative fluoroscopic computed tomography. The mean operative time for an asleep, bilateral implant without implantable pulse generator placement was 238 minutes (SD: 52 minutes), and skin-to-skin procedure time was 116 minutes (SD: 42 minutes). We describe a streamlined workflow for DBS lead placement using robot-assisted stereotaxy with a comparable accuracy profile. Obviating the need for checking and switching coordinates, as is standard for frame-based DBS, also reduces the chance for human error and facilitates training.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
A number of stereotactic platforms are available for performing deep brain stimulation (DBS) lead implantation. Robot-assisted stereotaxy has emerged more recently demonstrating comparable accuracy and shorter operating room times compared with conventional frame-based systems.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the accuracy of our streamlined robotic DBS workflow with data in the literature from frame-based and frameless systems.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 126 consecutive DBS lead placement procedures using a robotic stereotactic platform. Indications included Parkinson disease (n = 94), essential tremor (n = 21), obsessive compulsive disorder (n = 7), and dystonia (n = 4). Procedures were performed using a stereotactic frame for fixation and the frame pins as skull fiducials for robot registration. We used intraoperative fluoroscopic computed tomography for registration and postplacement verification.
RESULTS
The mean radial error for the target point was 1.06 mm (SD: 0.55 mm, range 0.04-2.80 mm) on intraoperative fluoroscopic computed tomography. The mean operative time for an asleep, bilateral implant without implantable pulse generator placement was 238 minutes (SD: 52 minutes), and skin-to-skin procedure time was 116 minutes (SD: 42 minutes).
CONCLUSION
We describe a streamlined workflow for DBS lead placement using robot-assisted stereotaxy with a comparable accuracy profile. Obviating the need for checking and switching coordinates, as is standard for frame-based DBS, also reduces the chance for human error and facilitates training.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35972090
doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000000298
pii: 01787389-202209000-00014
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
254-260Informations de copyright
Copyright © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2022. All rights reserved.
Références
Lee DJ, Lozano CS, Dallapiazza RF, Lozano AM. Current and future directions of deep brain stimulation for neurological and psychiatric disorders. J Neurosurg. 2019;131(2):333-342.
Youngerman BE, Chan AK, Mikell CB, McKhann GM, Sheth SA. A decade of emerging indications: deep brain stimulation in the United States. J Neurosurg. 2016;125(2):461-471.
Ellis TM, Foote KD, Fernandez HH, et al. Reoperation for suboptimal outcomes after deep brain stimulation surgery. Neurosurgery. 2008;63(4):754-761.
McClelland S III, Ford B, Senatus PB, et al. Subthalamic stimulation for Parkinson disease: determination of electrode location necessary for clinical efficacy. Neurosurg Focus. 2005;19(5):E12.
Okun MS, Tagliati M, Pourfar M, et al. Management of referred deep brain stimulation failures: a retrospective analysis from 2 movement disorders centers. Arch Neurol. 2005;62(8):1250-1255.
Papavassiliou E, Rau G, Heath S, et al. Thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: relation of lead location to outcome. Neurosurgery. 2004;54(5):1120-1130.
Richardson RM, Ostrem JL, Starr PA. Surgical repositioning of misplaced subthalamic electrodes in Parkinson's disease: location of effective and ineffective leads. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2009;87(5):297-303.
Xu F, Jin H, Yang X, et al. Improved accuracy using a modified registration method of ROSA in deep brain stimulation surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2018;45(2):E18.
Kramer DR, Halpern CH, Buonacore DL, McGill KR, Hurtig HI, Jaggi JL. Best surgical practices: a stepwise approach to the University of Pennsylvania deep brain stimulation protocol. Neurosurg Focus. 2010;29(2):E3.
Amirnovin R, Williams ZM, Cosgrove GR, Eskandar EN. Experience with microelectrode guided subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1 suppl):ONS9-ONS102.
Starr PA, Turner RS, Rau G, et al. Microelectrode-guided implantation of deep brain stimulators into the globus pallidus internus for dystonia: techniques, electrode locations, and outcomes. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(4):488-501.
Cardinale F, Cossu M, Castana L, et al. Stereoelectroencephalography: surgical methodology, safety, and stereotactic application accuracy in 500 procedures. Neurosurgery. 2013;72(3):353-366.
Dorfer C, Minchev G, Czech T, et al. A novel miniature robotic device for frameless implantation of depth electrodes in refractory epilepsy. J Neurosurg. 2017;126(5):1622-1628.
Faria C, Erlhagen W, Rito M, De Momi E, Ferrigno G, Bicho E. Review of robotic technology for stereotactic neurosurgery. IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2015;8:125-137.
Gonzalez-Martinez J, Bulacio J, Thompson S, et al. Technique, results, and complications related to robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography. Neurosurgery. 2016;78(2):169-180.
Kim LH, Feng AY, Ho AL, et al. Robot-assisted versus manual navigated stereoelectroencephalography in adult medically-refractory epilepsy patients. Epilepsy Res. 2020;159:106253.
Goia A, Gilard V, Lefaucheur R, Welter ML, Maltête D, Derrey S. Accuracy of the robot-assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation. Int J Med Robot. 2019;15(6):e2032.
Ho AL, Pendharkar AV, Brewster R, et al. Frameless robot-assisted deep brain stimulation surgery: an initial experience. Oper Neurosurg. 2019;17(4):424-431.
VanSickle D, Volk V, Freeman P, Henry J, Baldwin M, Fitzpatrick CK. Electrode placement accuracy in robot-assisted asleep deep brain stimulation. Ann Biomed Eng. 2019;47(5):1212-1222.
Sierens DK, Kutz S, Pilitsis JG, Bakay RAE. Stereotactic surgery with microelectrode recordings. In: Bakay RAE, ed. Movement Disorder Surgery: The Essentials. Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.; 2009:83-114.
Ozturk M, Abosch A, Francis D, Wu J, Jimenez-Shahed J, Ince NF. Distinct subthalamic coupling in the ON state describes motor performance in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. 2020;35(1):91-100.
Ozturk M, Kaku H, Jimenez-Shahed J, et al. Subthalamic single cell and oscillatory neural dynamics of a dyskinetic medicated patient with Parkinson's disease. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:391.
Ozturk M, Telkes I, Jimenez-Shahed J, et al. Randomized, double-blind assessment of lfp versus SUA guidance in STN-DBS lead implantation: a pilot study. Front Neurosci. 2020;14:611.
Telkes I, Jimenez-Shahed J, Viswanathan A, Abosch A, Ince NF. Prediction of STN-DBS electrode implantation track in Parkinson's disease by using local field potentials. Front Neurosci. 2016;10:198.
Telkes I, Viswanathan A, Jimenez-Shahed J, et al. Local field potentials of subthalamic nucleus contain electrophysiological footprints of motor subtypes of Parkinson's disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018;115(36):E8567-E8576.
Faraji AH, Kokkinos V, Sweat JC, Crammond DJ, Richardson RM. Robotic-assisted stereotaxy for deep brain stimulation lead implantation in awake patients. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19(4):444-452.
Liu L, Mariani SG, De Schlichting E, et al. Frameless ROSA robot-assisted lead implantation for deep brain stimulation: technique and accuracy. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19(1):57-64.
Neudorfer C, Hunsche S, Hellmich M, El Majdoub F, Maarouf M. Comparative study of robot-assisted versus conventional frame-based deep brain stimulation stereotactic neurosurgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2018;96(5):327-334.
Lefranc M, Le Gars D. Robotic implantation of deep brain stimulation leads, assisted by intra-operative, flat-panel CT. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(11):2069-2074.
Moran C, Sarangmat N, Gerard CS, et al. Two hundred twenty-six consecutive deep brain stimulation electrodes placed using an “asleep” technique and the Neuro|Mate robot for the treatment of movement disorders. Oper Neurosurg. 2020;19(5):530-538.
Vadera S, Chan A, Lo T, et al. Frameless stereotactic robot-assisted subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation: case report. World Neurosurg. 2017;97:762.e11-762.e14.
Varma TR, Eldridge PR, Forster A, et al. Use of the NeuroMate stereotactic robot in a frameless mode for movement disorder surgery. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;80(1-4):132-135.
von Langsdorff D, Paquis P, Fontaine D. In vivo measurement of the frame-based application accuracy of the Neuromate neurosurgical robot. J Neurosurg. 2015;122(1):191-194.
Rolston JD, Englot DJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. An unexpectedly high rate of revisions and removals in deep brain stimulation surgery: analysis of multiple databases. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2016;33:72-77.
Ho AL, Ali R, Connolly ID, et al. Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a critical comparison and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018;89(7):87-691.
Spyrantis A, Cattani A, Woebbecke T, et al. Electrode placement accuracy in robot-assisted epilepsy surgery: a comparison of different referencing techniques including frame-based CT versus facial laser scan based on CT or MRI. Epilepsy Behav. 2019;91:38-47.
Brandmeir NJ, Savaliya S, Rohatgi P, Sather M. The comparative accuracy of the ROSA stereotactic robot across a wide range of clinical applications and registration techniques. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(1):157-163.
Fenoy AJ, Conner CR. Frameless robot-assisted vs frame-based awake deep brain stimulation surgery: an evaluation of technique and new challenges. Oper Neurosurg. 2022;22(3):171-178.
Coleman RR, Kotagal V, Patil PG, Chou KL. Validity and efficacy of screening algorithms for assessing deep brain stimulation candidacy in Parkinson disease. Mov Disord Clin Pract. 2014;1(4):342-347.
Lange M, Mauerer J, Schlaier J, et al. Underutilization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease? A survey on possible clinical reasons. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2017;159(5):771-778.
Brodsky MA, Anderson S, Murchison C, et al. Clinical outcomes of asleep vs awake deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. Neurology. 2017;89(19):1944-1950.
Chen T, Mirzadeh Z, Chapple KM, et al. Clinical outcomes following awake and asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson disease. J Neurosurg. 2018;130(1):109-120.
LaHue SC, Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, et al. Parkinson's disease patient preference and experience with various methods of DBS lead placement. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2017;41:25-30.