Quantifying rhythmicity in perceptual reports.

Behavioral oscillations Group-level inference Phase locking Psychophysics methods Single-trial analysis Spectral analysis

Journal

NeuroImage
ISSN: 1095-9572
Titre abrégé: Neuroimage
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9215515

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
15 11 2022
Historique:
received: 14 04 2022
revised: 30 07 2022
accepted: 11 08 2022
pubmed: 17 8 2022
medline: 14 9 2022
entrez: 16 8 2022
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Several recent studies investigated the rhythmic nature of cognitive processes that lead to perception and behavioral report. These studies used different methods, and there has not yet been an agreement on a general standard. Here, we present a way to test and quantitatively compare these methods. We simulated behavioral data from a typical experiment and analyzed these data with several methods. We applied the main methods found in the literature, namely sine-wave fitting, the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) and the least square spectrum (LSS). DFT and LSS can be applied both on the average accuracy time course and on single trials. LSS is mathematically equivalent to DFT in the case of regular, but not irregular sampling - which is more common. LSS additionally offers the possibility to take into account a weighting factor which affects the strength of the rhythm, such as arousal. Statistical inferences were done either on the investigated sample (fixed-effects) or on the population (random-effects) of simulated participants. Multiple comparisons across frequencies were corrected using False Discovery Rate, Bonferroni, or the Max-Based approach. To perform a quantitative comparison, we calculated sensitivity, specificity and D-prime of the investigated analysis methods and statistical approaches. Within the investigated parameter range, single-trial methods had higher sensitivity and D-prime than the methods based on the average accuracy time course. This effect was further increased for a simulated rhythm of higher frequency. If an additional (observable) factor influenced detection performance, adding this factor as weight in the LSS further improved sensitivity and D-prime. For multiple comparison correction, the Max-Based approach provided the highest specificity and D-prime, closely followed by the Bonferroni approach. Given a fixed total amount of trials, the random-effects approach had higher D-prime when trials were distributed over a larger number of participants, even though this gave less trials per participant. Finally, we present the idea of using a dampened sinusoidal oscillator instead of a simple sinusoidal function, to further improve the fit to behavioral rhythmicity observed after a reset event.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35973565
pii: S1053-8119(22)00676-0
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119561
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

119561

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest P.F. has a patent on thin-film electrodes and is beneficiary of a respective license contract with Blackrock Microsystems LLC (Salt Lake City, UT, USA). P.F. is a member of the Advisory Board of CorTec GmbH (Freiburg, Germany) and is managing director of Brain Science GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany).

Auteurs

Tommaso Tosato (T)

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: tommaso.tosato@esi-frankfurt.de.

Gustavo Rohenkohl (G)

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Physiology, Institute of Biosciences, University of São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-000, Brazil.

Jarrod Robert Dowdall (JR)

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany; Robarts Research Institute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.

Pascal Fries (P)

Ernst Strüngmann Institute (ESI) for Neuroscience in Cooperation with Max Planck Society, Deutschordenstraße 46, 60528 Frankfurt, Germany; Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University Nijmegen, 6525 EN Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: pascal.fries@esi-frankfurt.de.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH