Fundamental social motives measured across forty-two cultures in two waves.
Journal
Scientific data
ISSN: 2052-4463
Titre abrégé: Sci Data
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101640192
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 08 2022
16 08 2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
accepted:
21
07
2022
entrez:
16
8
2022
pubmed:
17
8
2022
medline:
19
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
How does psychology vary across human societies? The fundamental social motives framework adopts an evolutionary approach to capture the broad range of human social goals within a taxonomy of ancestrally recurring threats and opportunities. These motives-self-protection, disease avoidance, affiliation, status, mate acquisition, mate retention, and kin care-are high in fitness relevance and everyday salience, yet understudied cross-culturally. Here, we gathered data on these motives in 42 countries (N = 15,915) in two cross-sectional waves, including 19 countries (N = 10,907) for which data were gathered in both waves. Wave 1 was collected from mid-2016 through late 2019 (32 countries, N = 8,998; 3,302 male, 5,585 female; M
Identifiants
pubmed: 35974021
doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w
pii: 10.1038/s41597-022-01579-w
pmc: PMC9380674
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
499Subventions
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 1822713
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 1822713
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 1822713
Organisme : National Science Foundation (NSF)
ID : 1822713
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation)
ID : 2018/01347-8
Organisme : Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (São Paulo Research Foundation)
ID : 2017/11748-7
Organisme : Akademie Věd České Republiky (Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic)
ID : 68081740
Organisme : Grantová Agentura České Republiky (Grant Agency of the Czech Republic)
ID : 17-14387S
Organisme : Universidad de La Frontera (University of the Frontier)
ID : DIUFRO DI20-0080
Commentaires et corrections
Type : ErratumIn
Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May;96(5):980-94
pubmed: 19379031
Nat Methods. 2020 Mar;17(3):261-272
pubmed: 32015543
Health Psychol. 2000 Nov;19(6):586-92
pubmed: 11129362
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2016 Jun;110(6):887-907
pubmed: 26371400
Science. 1988 Oct 28;242(4878):519-24
pubmed: 3175672
Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Apr;28(2):247-75; discussion 275-311
pubmed: 16201459
PLoS One. 2011;6(9):e23929
pubmed: 21912651
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 3;103(1):135-40
pubmed: 16371466
Behav Brain Sci. 2010 Jun;33(2-3):61-83; discussion 83-135
pubmed: 20550733
Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):3-28
pubmed: 12529056
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;15(1):173-201
pubmed: 31791196
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 6;115(45):11401-11405
pubmed: 30397114
J Mark Res. 2009 Jun 1;46(3):384-395
pubmed: 19727416
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Aug;24(8):620-638
pubmed: 32534836
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2010 Apr;1(2):182-189
pubmed: 21874152
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2010 May;5(3):292-314
pubmed: 21874133
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011 Apr;100(4):664-80
pubmed: 21038972
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2021 Dec;47(12):1705-1721
pubmed: 33615910
J Pers Assess. 1985 Feb;49(1):71-5
pubmed: 16367493
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Jul 22;278(1715):2223-32
pubmed: 21147798
Psychol Bull. 2005 Sep;131(5):763-84
pubmed: 16187859
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007 Sep;93(3):389-401
pubmed: 17723055
Hum Nat. 2001 Dec;12(4):273-97
pubmed: 26192409
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005 Jan;88(1):63-78
pubmed: 15631575
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2017 Sep;43(9):1337-1352
pubmed: 28903683
Psychol Sci. 2020 Apr;31(4):408-423
pubmed: 32196435
Psychol Bull. 2000 Jan;126(1):55-77
pubmed: 10668350
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Mar;102(3):550-61
pubmed: 22003837
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Aug;91(2):281-94
pubmed: 16881765