Serious hazards of transfusion: evaluating the dangers of a wrong patient autologous salvaged blood in cardiac surgery.
Autologous-salvaged blood
Human factors
Medical error
Patient safety
Root cause analysis
Transfusion
Wrong patient
Journal
Journal of cardiothoracic surgery
ISSN: 1749-8090
Titre abrégé: J Cardiothorac Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101265113
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Aug 2022
16 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
28
04
2022
accepted:
09
08
2022
entrez:
16
8
2022
pubmed:
17
8
2022
medline:
19
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The past half century has seen the near eradication of transfusion-associated hazards. Intraoperative cell salvage while widely used still poses significant risks and hazards due to human error. We report on a case in which blood collected from a patient with lung cancer was mistakenly administered to a patient undergoing cardiac surgery who should have received his own collected blood. The initial investigation found that the cause of the patient harm was violations of procedures by hospital personnel. A detailed investigation revealed that not only violations were the cause, but also that the underlying causes included haphazard organizational policies, poor communication, workload and staffing deficiencies, human factors and cultural challenges. On August 14, 2019, a 72-year-old male was admitted to our hospital for angina pectoris and multivessel coronary artery disease. Cardiac surgery was performed using an autologous salvage blood collection system, and there were no major problems other than the prolonged operation time. During the night after the surgery, when the patient's blood pressure dropped, a nurse retrieved a blood bag from the ICU refrigerator that had been collected during the surgery and administered it at the physician's direction, but at this time neither the physician nor the nurse performed the required checking procedures. The blood administered was another patient's blood taken from another surgery the day before; an ABO mismatch transfusion occurred and the patient was diagnosed with DIC. The patient was discharged 65 days later after numerous interventions to support the patient. An accident investigation committee was convened to analyze the root causes and develop countermeasures to prevent a recurrence. This adverse event occurred because the protocol for intraoperative blood salvage management was not clearly defined, and the procedure was different from the standard transfusion practices. We developed a new workflow based on a human factors grounded, systems-wide improvement strategy in which intraoperative blood collection would be administered before the patient leaves the operating room to completely prevent recurrence, instead of simply requiring front-line staff to do a double-check. Implementing strong systems processes can reduce the risk of errors, improve the reliability of the work processes and reduce the likelihood of patient harm occurring in the future.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The past half century has seen the near eradication of transfusion-associated hazards. Intraoperative cell salvage while widely used still poses significant risks and hazards due to human error. We report on a case in which blood collected from a patient with lung cancer was mistakenly administered to a patient undergoing cardiac surgery who should have received his own collected blood. The initial investigation found that the cause of the patient harm was violations of procedures by hospital personnel. A detailed investigation revealed that not only violations were the cause, but also that the underlying causes included haphazard organizational policies, poor communication, workload and staffing deficiencies, human factors and cultural challenges.
CASE PRESENTATION
METHODS
On August 14, 2019, a 72-year-old male was admitted to our hospital for angina pectoris and multivessel coronary artery disease. Cardiac surgery was performed using an autologous salvage blood collection system, and there were no major problems other than the prolonged operation time. During the night after the surgery, when the patient's blood pressure dropped, a nurse retrieved a blood bag from the ICU refrigerator that had been collected during the surgery and administered it at the physician's direction, but at this time neither the physician nor the nurse performed the required checking procedures. The blood administered was another patient's blood taken from another surgery the day before; an ABO mismatch transfusion occurred and the patient was diagnosed with DIC. The patient was discharged 65 days later after numerous interventions to support the patient. An accident investigation committee was convened to analyze the root causes and develop countermeasures to prevent a recurrence.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This adverse event occurred because the protocol for intraoperative blood salvage management was not clearly defined, and the procedure was different from the standard transfusion practices. We developed a new workflow based on a human factors grounded, systems-wide improvement strategy in which intraoperative blood collection would be administered before the patient leaves the operating room to completely prevent recurrence, instead of simply requiring front-line staff to do a double-check. Implementing strong systems processes can reduce the risk of errors, improve the reliability of the work processes and reduce the likelihood of patient harm occurring in the future.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35974374
doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01931-6
pii: 10.1186/s13019-022-01931-6
pmc: PMC9382733
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
182Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Transfus Apher Sci. 2020 Jun;59(3):102735
pubmed: 32019735
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2005 Jan;31(1):5-12
pubmed: 15691205
Transfus Med. 2019 Aug;29(4):262-267
pubmed: 31309638
Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3601-3607
pubmed: 31584694
Am J Clin Pathol. 2008 Feb;129(2):276-81
pubmed: 18208808
Am Fam Physician. 2011 Mar 15;83(6):719-24
pubmed: 21404983
Semin Vasc Surg. 1994 Jun;7(2):89-90
pubmed: 8087287
Transfus Med Hemother. 2008;35(5):346-353
pubmed: 21512623
Transfus Med Hemother. 2021 Mar;48(2):118-129
pubmed: 33976612
JAMA. 1973 Sep 17;225(12):1516-21
pubmed: 4740721
Transfus Med Rev. 2006 Oct;20(4):273-82
pubmed: 17008165
Transfusion. 2020 Dec;60(12):2867-2875
pubmed: 33064880
Blood. 2009 Apr 9;113(15):3406-17
pubmed: 19188662
West J Med. 2000 Jun;172(6):393-6
pubmed: 10854390
Anesth Analg. 2001 Dec;93(6):1483-5, table of contents
pubmed: 11726427