Systematic review of service improvements for home enteral tube feeding in adults.
education
enteral nutrition
home nutrition support
rehospitalization
systematic review
Journal
Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
ISSN: 1941-2452
Titre abrégé: Nutr Clin Pract
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8606733
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2023
Apr 2023
Historique:
revised:
28
06
2022
received:
31
10
2021
accepted:
16
07
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
17
3
2023
entrez:
17
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients receiving home enteral tube feeding (HETF) have a high risk of complications and readmission to hospital. This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of staff- and/or patient-focused service-improvement strategies on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes for patients receiving HETF across adult settings. The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Quality of studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data found targeted HETF education with patients, carers, and staff significantly improved knowledge immediately after education and was sustained at 3-6 months. Multimodal interventions, including the formation of specialist HETF teams, significantly reduced complications such as infection, gastrostomy blockage, tube displacement, and feed intolerance but do not significantly reduce unplanned hospital encounters (outpatient clinic visits, hospitalizations, and emergency presentations). Owing to the high risk of bias in the included studies, there is low-quality evidence to support staff training, patient education, and dedicated HETF teams. This review highlights the need for further quality research to allow higher-level evidence for determining the usefulness of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients receiving HETF. Future research needs to include greater assessment of quality of life, quantification of the value of interventions in economic terms, and use of translational research frameworks. However, effective staff and patient education programs, along with comprehensive multidisciplinary care, should be considered standard care until a larger research base is developed.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Patients receiving home enteral tube feeding (HETF) have a high risk of complications and readmission to hospital. This study aims to evaluate effectiveness of staff- and/or patient-focused service-improvement strategies on clinical, patient-reported, and economic outcomes for patients receiving HETF across adult settings.
METHODS
METHODS
The search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases. Quality of studies were appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) assessment.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria. Pooled data found targeted HETF education with patients, carers, and staff significantly improved knowledge immediately after education and was sustained at 3-6 months. Multimodal interventions, including the formation of specialist HETF teams, significantly reduced complications such as infection, gastrostomy blockage, tube displacement, and feed intolerance but do not significantly reduce unplanned hospital encounters (outpatient clinic visits, hospitalizations, and emergency presentations). Owing to the high risk of bias in the included studies, there is low-quality evidence to support staff training, patient education, and dedicated HETF teams.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This review highlights the need for further quality research to allow higher-level evidence for determining the usefulness of interventions aimed at improving outcomes for patients receiving HETF. Future research needs to include greater assessment of quality of life, quantification of the value of interventions in economic terms, and use of translational research frameworks. However, effective staff and patient education programs, along with comprehensive multidisciplinary care, should be considered standard care until a larger research base is developed.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
329-339Informations de copyright
© 2022 American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.
Références
Norman K, Pichard C, Lochs H, Pirlich M. Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(1):5-15.
Ojo O, Keaveney E, Xiao-Hua W, Feng P. The effect of enteral tube feeding on patients' health-related quality of life: a systematic review. Nutrients. 2019;11(5):1046.
Ojo O, Brooke J. Recent advances in enteral nutrition. Nutrients. 2016;8(11):709.
Wireko BM, Bowling T. Enteral tube feeding. Clin Med. 2010;10(6):616-619.
Lim ML, Yong BYP, Mar MQM, et al. Caring for patients on home enteral nutrition: reported complications by home carers and perspectives of community nurses. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(13-14):2825-2835.
Kirby DF, Delegge MH, Fleming CR. American gastroenterological association technical review on tube feeding for enteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 1995;108(4):1282-1301.
Lloyd DA, Powell-Tuck JJ. Artificial nutrition: principles and practice of enteral feeding. clinics in colon and rectal. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(2):107-118.
Arrowsmith HL. Discharging patients receiving enteral nutrition. Br J Nurs. 1994;3(11):551-557.
Green S, Dinenage S, Gower M, Van Wyk J. Home enteral nutrition: organisation of services. Nurs Older People. 2013;25(4):14-18.
Russell CA, Rollins H. The needs of patients requiring home enteral tube feeding. J Prof Nurs. 2002;17(8):500-502.
Bischoff SC, Austin P, Boeykens K, et al. ESPEN guideline on home enteral nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2020;39(1):5-22.
Hebuterne X, Bozzetti F, Moreno Villares JM, et al. Home enteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey. Clin Nutr. 2003;22(3):261-266.
Crosby J, Duerksen D. A retrospective survey of tube-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. Dig Dis Sci. 2005;50(9):1712-1717.
Fuchs S. Gastrostomy tubes: care and feeding. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2017;33(12):787-791.
Crosby J, Duerksen DR. A prospective study of tube- and feeding-related complications in patients receiving long-term home enteral nutrition. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2007;31(4):274-277.
Nelson KE, Lacombe-Duncan A, Cohen E, et al. Family experiences with feeding tubes in neurologic impairment: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):e140-e151.
Hitchings H, Best C, Steed I. Home enteral tube feeding in older people: consideration of the issues. Br J Nurs. 2010;19(18):1150-1154.
Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE, et al. Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet. 1993;341(8849):869-872.
Ds S, Mj C, Silva JD, Me M, Pj W, Kd B. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a prospective analysis of hospital support required and complications following discharge to the community. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2001;55(7):610.
Marcus C. Strategies for improving the quality of verbale pateint and family education: a review of the literature and creating of the EDUCATE model. Health Psychol Behav Med. 2014;2(1):482-495.
Flood C, Parker EK, Kaul N, et al. A benchmarking study of home enteral nutrition services. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021;46:S735-S736.
Martin K, Gardner G. Home enteral nutrition: updates, trends, and challenges. Nutr Clin Prac. 2017;32(6):712-721.
Agency for Clinical Innovation. Consumer Focus Groups-Tube Feeding. Agency for Clinical Innovation; 2016.
Shortall C, Aherne M, Boland S, Sheane R, Ward F, Hensey O. Hospital to home paediatric enteral nutrition-parents need support. Ir J Med. 2015;108(2):46.
Leslie FC, Thomas S. Symposium 9: competent to care Are all doctors competent in nutrition? Proc Nutr Soc. 2009;68(3):296-299.
Vetter ML, Herring SJ, Sood M, Shah NR, Kalet AL. What do resident physicians know about nutrition? An evaluation of attitudes, self-perceived proficiency and knowledge. J Am Coll Nutr. 2008;27(2):287-298.
Agency for Clinical Innovation. Results of the Gastrostomy Care Baseline Survey 2015. Agency for Clinical Innovation; 2016.
Majka AJ, Wang Z, Schmitz KR, et al. Care coordination to enhance management of long-term enteral tube feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2014;38(1):40-52.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:i4898.
Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328(7454):1490.
Chang SC, Huang CY, Lin CH, Tu SL, Chao MS, Chen MH. The effects of systematic educational interventions about nasogastric tube feeding on caregivers' knowledge and skills and the incidence of feeding complications. J Clin Nurs. 2015;24(11-12):1567-1575.
Madigan SM, Fleming P, Wright ME, Stevenson M, Macauley D. A cluster randomised controlled trial of a nutrition education intervention in the community. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2014;27(s2):12-20.
Simmance N, Cortinovis T, Green C, et al. Introducing novel advanced practice roles into the health workforce: dietitians leading in gastrostomy management. Nutr Diet. 2019;76(1):14-20.
Allison SP, Micklewright A, Rawlings J, Hull M. Organisation and evaluation of home enteral nutrition services. Clin Nutr. 1993;12:S38-S43.
Boisseau N, Burde A, Bachmann P, Senesse P, Hebuterne X. A telephone-linked computer system for home enteral nutrition. J Telemed Telecare. 2010;16(7):363-367.
Dinenage S, Gower M, Van Wyk J, et al. Development and evaluation of a home enteral nutrition team. Nutrients. 2015;7(3):1607-1617.
Hall BT, Englehart MS, Blaseg K, Wessel K, Stawicki SPA, Evans DC. Implementation of a dietitian-led enteral nutrition support clinic results in quality improvement, reduced readmissions, and cost savings. Nutr Clin Pract. 2014;29(5):649-655.
Kurien M, White S, Simpson G, Grant J, Sanders DS, Mcalindon ME. Managing patients with gastrostomy tubes in the community: can a dedicated enteral feed dietetic service reduce hospital readmissions? Eur J Clin Nutr. 2012;66(6):757-760.
Matthewson K, White S, Torrance A, Clark S, Bottrill P. A prospective study of the workload of a newly formed PEG advice team. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2001;14(1):21-23.
Scott F, Beech R, Smedley F, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind trial of the costs and consequences of systematic nutrition team follow-up over 12 mo after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Nutrition. 2005;21(11):1071-1077.
Tanswell I, Barrett D, Emm C, et al. Assessment by a multidisciplinary clinical nutrition team before percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement reduces early postprocedure mortality. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2007;31(3):205-211.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473-483.
Bannerman E, Pendlebury J, Phillips F, Ghosh S. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of HRQOL after PEG. Eur J Gastroent Hepatol. 2000;12(10):1101-1109.
Drummond MF, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes. 4th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015.
Cuerda MC, Apezetxea A, Carrillo L, et al. Development and validation of a specific questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in patients with home enteral nutrition: NutriQoL development. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:2289-2296.
Grimshaw JM, Shirran L, Thomas R, et al. Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care. 2001;39(8 suppl 2):II2-II45.
Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8(1):139.
Ojo O. Home enteral nutrition NICE guidelines and nutrition support in primary care. Br J Community Nurs. 2010;15(3):116-120.
Faruquie S, Parker E, Talbot P. An evaluation of current home enteral nutrition services at principal referral hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. Aust Health Rev. 2016;40(1):106-113.