Feasibility testing of a standardised virtual clinic for follow-up of patients after hip and knee arthroplasty.
Arthroplasty
Virtual clinic
Journal
Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
ISSN: 1478-7083
Titre abrégé: Ann R Coll Surg Engl
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7506860
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2023
Mar 2023
Historique:
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
3
3
2023
entrez:
17
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Over 200,000 hip and knee total joint arthroplasties (TJAs) are performed annually in England and Wales. UK guidelines recommend regular follow-up because missed early failure can result in complex revision surgery, which places additional burden on overstretched orthopaedic services. This study evaluated the feasibility and acceptability of an expert, consensus-based, standardised virtual clinic (VC) approach for TJA follow-up. Five UK secondary care orthopaedic centres implemented a standardised VC. Feedback was obtained through patient satisfaction questionnaires and telephone interviews with arthroplasty care practitioners. Key stakeholders subsequently attended an expert discussion forum to achieve consensus on the final VC format and to address obstacles identified during testing. From 19 June 2018 to 11 December 2018, 561 TJA patients [mean age (SD) 70 (9.4) years, 57.8% female, 69.0% hip TJA, 1-28 years postsurgery (median 5 years)] completed a VC. Of these 561 patients, 82.2% were discharged without attending an outpatient appointment and 46 (8.8%) required early face-to-face consultant review. Patient satisfaction with the VC was high (156/188; 83.0%); over 70% of patients indicated a preference for the VC. This feasibility study suggested significant resource savings, including time spent by consultant orthopaedic surgeons in outpatient clinics, hospital transport and an estimated saving of up to two-thirds of usual clinic-allotted time. The expert discussion forum provided helpful feedback for supporting more efficient implementation of the VC. A standardised VC is a feasible alternative to outpatient clinics for the follow-up of hip and knee TJA patients, and is acceptable to key stakeholders, including patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35975843
doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2021.0356
pmc: PMC9974348
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
252-262Subventions
Organisme : Versus Arthritis
ID : 21409
Pays : United Kingdom
Références
Musculoskeletal Care. 2016 Jun;14(2):116-20
pubmed: 26248801
Bone Joint J. 2019 Aug;101-B(8):951-959
pubmed: 31362551
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Jun 27;:
pubmed: 29952097
Int J Clin Pract. 2011 Oct;65(10):1100-7
pubmed: 21923849
Musculoskeletal Care. 2014 Dec;12(4):232-8
pubmed: 25065760
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;3(2):76-80
pubmed: 28839638
Bone Joint J. 2016 Feb;98-B(2):201-8
pubmed: 26850425
BMJ Open Qual. 2019 Mar 1;8(1):e000502
pubmed: 31259271
Injury. 2017 Apr;48(4):966-970
pubmed: 28284470