Quality assurance for automatically generated contours with additional deep learning.
Confidence calibration
Diagnostic imaging
Magnetic resonance imaging
Prostate
Quality assurance (Health care)
Journal
Insights into imaging
ISSN: 1869-4101
Titre abrégé: Insights Imaging
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101532453
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Aug 2022
17 Aug 2022
Historique:
received:
30
03
2022
accepted:
24
07
2022
entrez:
17
8
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
18
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Deploying an automatic segmentation model in practice should require rigorous quality assurance (QA) and continuous monitoring of the model's use and performance, particularly in high-stakes scenarios such as healthcare. Currently, however, tools to assist with QA for such models are not available to AI researchers. In this work, we build a deep learning model that estimates the quality of automatically generated contours. The model was trained to predict the segmentation quality by outputting an estimate of the Dice similarity coefficient given an image contour pair as input. Our dataset contained 60 axial T2-weighted MRI images of prostates with ground truth segmentations along with 80 automatically generated segmentation masks. The model we used was a 3D version of the EfficientDet architecture with a custom regression head. For validation, we used a fivefold cross-validation. To counteract the limitation of the small dataset, we used an extensive data augmentation scheme capable of producing virtually infinite training samples from a single ground truth label mask. In addition, we compared the results against a baseline model that only uses clinical variables for its predictions. Our model achieved a mean absolute error of 0.020 ± 0.026 (2.2% mean percentage error) in estimating the Dice score, with a rank correlation of 0.42. Furthermore, the model managed to correctly identify incorrect segmentations (defined in terms of acceptable/unacceptable) 99.6% of the time. We believe that the trained model can be used alongside automatic segmentation tools to ensure quality and thus allow intervention to prevent undesired segmentation behavior.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35976491
doi: 10.1186/s13244-022-01276-7
pii: 10.1186/s13244-022-01276-7
pmc: PMC9385913
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
137Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Eur Radiol. 2021 Feb;31(2):716-728
pubmed: 32852590
Med Phys. 2019 Jan;46(1):e1-e36
pubmed: 30367497
Med Phys. 2019 Sep;46(9):4010-4020
pubmed: 31274193
Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015 Sep-Oct;5(5):e431-e436
pubmed: 26215585
Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jul;29(3):185-197
pubmed: 31027636
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec;17(12):771-781
pubmed: 32843739
Med Image Anal. 2020 Jul;63:101693
pubmed: 32289663
Front Oncol. 2020 Apr 28;10:524
pubmed: 32426272
J Med Phys. 2010 Jan;35(1):3-14
pubmed: 20177565
J Vis Exp. 2018 Apr 11;(134):
pubmed: 29708544
Med Phys. 2015 Feb;42(2):1048-59
pubmed: 25652517
Med Phys. 2018 May;45(5):2089-2096
pubmed: 29481703
Radiother Oncol. 2020 Dec;153:55-66
pubmed: 32920005
Front Oncol. 2020 Jul 03;10:986
pubmed: 32719742
Phys Med Biol. 2015 Jul 07;60(13):5199-209
pubmed: 26083863
Phys Med. 2020 Mar;71:7-13
pubmed: 32086149
Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2000;2:315-37
pubmed: 11701515
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2013 Jun;32(6):1043-57
pubmed: 23475352
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020 Dec;39(12):3868-3878
pubmed: 32746129