Wolves and dogs fail to form reputations of humans after indirect and direct experience in a food-giving situation.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
21
12
2021
accepted:
01
07
2022
entrez:
17
8
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
20
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Reputation is a key component in social interactions of group-living animals and appears to play a role in the establishment of cooperation. Animals can form reputations of individuals by directly interacting with them or by observing them interact with a third party, i.e., eavesdropping. Previous research has focused on whether dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) can eavesdrop on humans because of their ability to cooperate with humans, however the results are mixed and if they can eavesdrop, it is unknown whether this ability evolved during the domestication process or whether it was inherited from their ancestor, wolves (Canis lupus). Our study investigated whether equally hand-raised, pack-living dogs and wolves can form reputations of humans in a food-giving situation through indirect and/or direct experience. The experimental procedure comprised three parts: baseline (to test whether the subject preferred a person prior to the experiment), observation and testing. In the observation phase, the subject observed two humans interact with a dog demonstrator-one acted generously and fed the dog, and the other acted selfishly and refused to feed the dog. The subject could then choose which person to approach in the test phase. In the following experience phase, the animals interacted directly with the same two humans who behaved either in a generous or selfish manner. Then, they were again given a choice whom to approach. We found that dogs and wolves, at the group level, did not differentiate between a generous or selfish partner after indirect or direct experience, but wolves were more attentive towards the generous person during the observation phase and some dogs and wolves did prefer the generous partner, at least after indirect and direct experience was combined. Our study suggests that reputation formation may be more difficult than expected for animals and we emphasise the importance of context when studying reputation formation in animals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35976865
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271590
pii: PONE-D-21-40254
pmc: PMC9385025
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0271590Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Références
Anim Cogn. 2011 Mar;14(2):291-302
pubmed: 21140184
Anim Behav. 2016 Dec;122:59-66
pubmed: 27974861
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Sep;9(9):439-44
pubmed: 16061417
Anim Cogn. 2019 Nov;22(6):991-1000
pubmed: 31317352
J Comp Psychol. 2013 Feb;127(1):63-75
pubmed: 22746158
Curr Biol. 2007 Nov 20;17(22):1938-42
pubmed: 17949977
Front Psychol. 2021 Jan 08;11:604372
pubmed: 33519611
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0253277
pubmed: 34260627
Am J Phys Anthropol. 1989 Apr;78(4):547-73
pubmed: 2540662
Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 15;5:1582
pubmed: 25642203
J Comp Psychol. 2016 Aug;130(3):288-98
pubmed: 27244538
PLoS One. 2011 Feb 23;6(2):e16888
pubmed: 21373192
Behav Ecol. 2009 Mar;20(2):416-420
pubmed: 19461866
Sci Rep. 2017 Sep 15;7(1):11690
pubmed: 28916808
Proc Biol Sci. 2012 Feb 7;279(1728):499-508
pubmed: 21715408
Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 26;9(1):17591
pubmed: 31772201
Anim Cogn. 2017 May;20(3):511-520
pubmed: 28251387
Behav Processes. 2008 May;78(1):108-11
pubmed: 18068313
Front Psychol. 2013 Dec 03;4:868
pubmed: 24363648
Anim Cogn. 2021 Jan;24(1):75-83
pubmed: 32757105
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 26;15(8):e0237373
pubmed: 32845903
Learn Behav. 2020 Dec;48(4):411-419
pubmed: 32314185
PLoS One. 2015 Feb 25;10(2):e0116314
pubmed: 25714915
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 13;8(11):e79198
pubmed: 24236108
Science. 2006 Mar 3;311(5765):1297-300
pubmed: 16513985
Anim Cogn. 2008 Oct;11(4):611-23
pubmed: 18357476
Trends Cogn Sci. 2013 Jun;17(6):287-94
pubmed: 23643552
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e46880
pubmed: 23056507
Trends Cogn Sci. 2022 Apr;26(4):337-349
pubmed: 35294857
Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 8;24(17):R791-3
pubmed: 25202866
Anim Behav. 2015 Sep;107:159-173
pubmed: 26405301
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 12;9(11):e112884
pubmed: 25389760
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 21;11:581794
pubmed: 33192900
Sci Rep. 2019 Mar 7;9(1):3796
pubmed: 30846770
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 May;85(2):327-45
pubmed: 19961472
Front Psychol. 2017 Feb 09;8:180
pubmed: 28232814
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 20;13(9):e0203165
pubmed: 30235228
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 29;9(1):e86559
pubmed: 24489744