Underrecognition of Dysmenorrhea Is an Iatrogenic Harm.
Journal
AMA journal of ethics
ISSN: 2376-6980
Titre abrégé: AMA J Ethics
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101649265
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 08 2022
01 08 2022
Historique:
entrez:
17
8
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
20
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Many patients face years of recurrent and debilitating menstrual pain that affects their ability to work and study. Patients often normalize their severe pain as an expected part of menses. Both underrecognition and lack of awareness of available therapies for this remediable condition serve as a quintessential example of hermeneutic injustice. Hermeneutic injustice describes a structural lack of access to epistemic resources, such as shared concepts and knowledge. Pervasive menstrual stigma further discourages people with dysmenorrhea from discussing their symptoms and seeking health care. A lack of respect for women's experiences of pain in clinical encounters acts to worsen these issues and should be considered a source of iatrogenic harm. Health care workers can promote hermeneutic justice by preemptively destigmatizing discussions about menstruation and validating patients' concerns. On a systemic level, there should be greater awareness of dysmenorrhea and the various treatments availabe for it.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35976930
pii: amajethics.2022.740
doi: 10.1001/amajethics.2022.740
doi:
pii:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
E740-747Informations de copyright
Copyright 2022 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.