Relationships between double cycling and inspiratory effort with diaphragm thickness during the early phase of mechanical ventilation: A prospective observational study.
Journal
PloS one
ISSN: 1932-6203
Titre abrégé: PLoS One
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101285081
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2022
2022
Historique:
received:
01
10
2021
accepted:
03
08
2022
entrez:
17
8
2022
pubmed:
18
8
2022
medline:
20
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Increased and decreased diaphragm thickness during mechanical ventilation is associated with poor outcomes. Some types of patient-ventilator asynchrony theoretically cause myotrauma of the diaphragm. However, the effects of double cycling on structural changes in the diaphragm have not been previously evaluated. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between double cycling during the early phase of mechanical ventilation and changes in diaphragm thickness, and the involvement of inspiratory effort in the occurrence of double cycling. We evaluated adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. The end-expiratory diaphragm thickness (Tdiee) was assessed via ultrasonography on days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 after the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Then, the maximum rate of change from day 1 (ΔTdiee%) was evaluated. Concurrently, we recorded esophageal pressure and airway pressure on days 1, 2 and 3 for 1 h during spontaneous breathing. Then, the waveforms were retrospectively analyzed to calculate the incidence of double cycling (double cycling index) and inspiratory esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes). Finally, the correlation between double cycling index as well as ΔPes and ΔTdiee% was investigated using linear regression models. In total, 19 patients with a median age of 69 (interquartile range: 65-78) years were enrolled in this study, and all received pressure assist-control ventilation. The Tdiee increased by more than 10% from baseline in nine patients, decreased by more than 10% in nine and remained unchanged in one. The double cycling indexes on days 1, 2 and 3 were 2.2%, 1.3% and 4.5%, respectively. There was a linear correlation between the double cycling index on day 3 and ΔTdiee% (R2 = 0.446, p = 0.002). The double cycling index was correlated with the ΔPes on days 2 (R2 = 0.319, p = 0.004) and 3 (R2 = 0.635, p < 0.001). Double cycling on the third day of mechanical ventilation was associated with strong inspiratory efforts and, possibly, changes in diaphragm thickness.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Increased and decreased diaphragm thickness during mechanical ventilation is associated with poor outcomes. Some types of patient-ventilator asynchrony theoretically cause myotrauma of the diaphragm. However, the effects of double cycling on structural changes in the diaphragm have not been previously evaluated. Hence, this study aimed to investigate the relationship between double cycling during the early phase of mechanical ventilation and changes in diaphragm thickness, and the involvement of inspiratory effort in the occurrence of double cycling.
METHODS
We evaluated adult patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation for more than 48 h. The end-expiratory diaphragm thickness (Tdiee) was assessed via ultrasonography on days 1, 2, 3, 5 and 7 after the initiation of mechanical ventilation. Then, the maximum rate of change from day 1 (ΔTdiee%) was evaluated. Concurrently, we recorded esophageal pressure and airway pressure on days 1, 2 and 3 for 1 h during spontaneous breathing. Then, the waveforms were retrospectively analyzed to calculate the incidence of double cycling (double cycling index) and inspiratory esophageal pressure swing (ΔPes). Finally, the correlation between double cycling index as well as ΔPes and ΔTdiee% was investigated using linear regression models.
RESULTS
In total, 19 patients with a median age of 69 (interquartile range: 65-78) years were enrolled in this study, and all received pressure assist-control ventilation. The Tdiee increased by more than 10% from baseline in nine patients, decreased by more than 10% in nine and remained unchanged in one. The double cycling indexes on days 1, 2 and 3 were 2.2%, 1.3% and 4.5%, respectively. There was a linear correlation between the double cycling index on day 3 and ΔTdiee% (R2 = 0.446, p = 0.002). The double cycling index was correlated with the ΔPes on days 2 (R2 = 0.319, p = 0.004) and 3 (R2 = 0.635, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
Double cycling on the third day of mechanical ventilation was associated with strong inspiratory efforts and, possibly, changes in diaphragm thickness.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35976965
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273173
pii: PONE-D-21-30599
pmc: PMC9385032
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e0273173Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
All authors disclose no conflict of interest.
Références
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Jan 15;197(2):204-213
pubmed: 28930478
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2019 Feb;25(1):77-85
pubmed: 30531536
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):788-800
pubmed: 26903337
Crit Care Med. 2013 Sep;41(9):2177-87
pubmed: 23782972
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Oct;43(10):1441-1452
pubmed: 28917004
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Jan 1;195(1):57-66
pubmed: 27310484
Crit Care Clin. 2018 Jul;34(3):357-381
pubmed: 29907270
N Engl J Med. 2000 May 18;342(20):1471-7
pubmed: 10816184
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2017 Feb 15;195(4):438-442
pubmed: 27626833
Ann Transl Med. 2017 Jul;5(14):292
pubmed: 28828367
Lancet. 2008 Jan 12;371(9607):126-34
pubmed: 18191684
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jan;157(1):230-6
pubmed: 9445304
Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Jan;7(1):90-98
pubmed: 30455078
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Feb 1;169(3):336-41
pubmed: 14739134
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Nov 1;192(9):1080-8
pubmed: 26167730
Anesthesiology. 2021 May 1;134(5):760-769
pubmed: 33662121
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1982 Nov;126(5):788-91
pubmed: 7149443
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct 1;202(7):950-961
pubmed: 32516052
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2016 Jun;22(3):246-53
pubmed: 27070802
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Nov;52(5):701-8
pubmed: 26044880
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Nov 1;164(9):1734-9
pubmed: 11719318
J Intensive Care. 2019 Dec 02;7:56
pubmed: 31827804
J Physiol. 2001 Dec 1;537(Pt 2):333-45
pubmed: 11731568
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):1385-1392
pubmed: 29985211
Crit Care Med. 2008 Nov;36(11):3019-23
pubmed: 18824913
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Oct;32(10):1515-22
pubmed: 16896854
Ann Pharmacother. 2012 Apr;46(4):530-40
pubmed: 22496477
Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):161-5
pubmed: 11133620
Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;46(11):1977-1986
pubmed: 33104824
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Jan;32(1):24-33
pubmed: 16231069
Br J Anaesth. 2006 Mar;96(3):384-90
pubmed: 16449234