Assessment of genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 for food and feed uses, under regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2018-151).

genetic engineering herbicide tolerant import and processing insect resistant maize (Zea mays)

Journal

EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority
ISSN: 1831-4732
Titre abrégé: EFSA J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101642076

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Historique:
entrez: 18 8 2022
pubmed: 19 8 2022
medline: 19 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Genetically modified maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9 was developed by crossing to combine five single events: MON 89034, 1507, MIR162, NK603 and DAS-40278-9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the five single maize events and 16 of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the assessed subcombinations were identified that could lead to the modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the five-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that five-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non-GM comparator and non-GM maize varieties tested. In the case of accidental release of viable five-event stack maize grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in nine of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the five-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize MON 89034 × 1507 × MIR162 × NK603 × DAS-40278-9. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the five-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as its non-GM comparator and the tested non-GM maize varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35978615
doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7451
pii: EFS27451
pmc: PMC9373840
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e07451

Informations de copyright

© 2022 Wiley‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KgaA on behalf of the European Food Safety Authority.

Références

Toxins (Basel). 2017 Apr 07;9(4):
pubmed: 28387713
Sci Rep. 2017 May 8;7(1):1560
pubmed: 28484216
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 29;6:283
pubmed: 25972882
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Feb;62(1):37-63
pubmed: 32876924
EMBO J. 1987 Sep;6(9):2519-23
pubmed: 16453790
Mol Nutr Food Res. 2009 Sep;53 Suppl 2:S330-75
pubmed: 19774556
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2013 Nov;43 Suppl 2:25-42
pubmed: 24164515
J Food Sci Technol. 2015 Feb;52(2):676-84
pubmed: 25694676
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 14;17(1):e05521
pubmed: 32665790
EFSA J. 2019 Jan 16;17(1):e05522
pubmed: 32626068
EFSA J. 2021 Dec 13;19(12):e06942
pubmed: 34938370
EFSA J. 2019 Nov 07;17(11):e05846
pubmed: 32626153
Environ Sci Eur. 2016;28(1):30
pubmed: 28090425
EFSA J. 2019 Aug 08;17(8):e05774
pubmed: 32626404
EFSA J. 2022 Apr 01;20(4):e07228
pubmed: 35386925
EFSA J. 2019 Nov 07;17(11):e05848
pubmed: 32626155
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):907-919
pubmed: 12242393
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 13;19(1):e06348
pubmed: 33488811
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2016 Mar 02;80(2):329-50
pubmed: 26935135
J Agric Food Chem. 2004 Apr 7;52(7):1958-64
pubmed: 15053536
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 25;16(7):e05347
pubmed: 32625982
EFSA J. 2018 Jul 11;16(7):e05309
pubmed: 32625956
EFSA J. 2019 Nov 07;17(11):e05845
pubmed: 32626152
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 08;17(7):e05734
pubmed: 32626365
Plant Cell Rep. 2000 Jul;19(8):798-803
pubmed: 30754872
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Jan;115(1):14-23; quiz 24
pubmed: 15637541
Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2016 Sep;15(5):912-926
pubmed: 33401800
EFSA J. 2017 Jun 22;15(6):e04862
pubmed: 32728397
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 19;19(1):e06351
pubmed: 33505528
Transgenic Res. 2009 Aug;18(4):583-94
pubmed: 19225900
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 13;19(1):e06347
pubmed: 33488810
Plant Physiol. 1994 May;105(1):159-166
pubmed: 12232195
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Mar;68(3):1137-45
pubmed: 11872461
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5389-94
pubmed: 8643585
Gene. 1988 Oct 15;70(1):25-37
pubmed: 3240868
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998 Sep;62(3):775-806
pubmed: 9729609
EFSA J. 2019 Jul 31;17(7):e05802
pubmed: 32626399
Annu Rev Anim Biosci. 2014 Feb;2:387-417
pubmed: 25384149
J Bacteriol. 1967 Nov;94(5):1492-6
pubmed: 4862193
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Oct 13;117(41):25618-25627
pubmed: 32989136
EFSA J. 2017 Oct 17;15(10):e05021
pubmed: 32625311
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Feb;73(3):956-61
pubmed: 17122403
EFSA J. 2021 Jan 12;19(1):e06350
pubmed: 33473251
J Invertebr Pathol. 2017 Jan;142:5-10
pubmed: 27480404
J Exp Bot. 2009;60(3):967-78
pubmed: 19204030
Methods Enzymol. 2019;621:213-229
pubmed: 31128780
Food Res Int. 2021 May;143:110284
pubmed: 33992384
EFSA J. 2017 Jan 12;15(1):e04659
pubmed: 32625255

Auteurs

Classifications MeSH