Beware of gastric tube in esophagectomy after gastric radiotherapy: A case report.
Case report
Cervical fistula
Colonic interposition
Esophageal cancer
Esophagogastrostomy
Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma
Journal
World journal of clinical cases
ISSN: 2307-8960
Titre abrégé: World J Clin Cases
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101618806
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
16 Jun 2022
16 Jun 2022
Historique:
received:
27
12
2021
revised:
11
03
2022
accepted:
09
04
2022
entrez:
18
8
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
19
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Gastric tube formation and pull-up is the most common technique of reconstruction following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. If previous treatment with radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-lymphoma restricts suitability of the stomach for anastomosis to the esophagus is unknown. A 57-year-old man underwent sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric MALT-lymphoma seven years prior to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment was recommended by the multidisciplinary tumor board due to early tumor stage [uT1 (sm2) uN+ cM0 according to TNM-classification of malignant tumors, 8 This case report may represent the start for further investigation to know if it is reasonable to refrain from esophagogastrostomy in patients with a long interval between gastric radiotherapy and surgery.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Gastric tube formation and pull-up is the most common technique of reconstruction following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. If previous treatment with radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT)-lymphoma restricts suitability of the stomach for anastomosis to the esophagus is unknown.
CASE SUMMARY
METHODS
A 57-year-old man underwent sequential chemotherapy and radiotherapy for gastric MALT-lymphoma seven years prior to diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Esophagectomy without neoadjuvant treatment was recommended by the multidisciplinary tumor board due to early tumor stage [uT1 (sm2) uN+ cM0 according to TNM-classification of malignant tumors, 8
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
This case report may represent the start for further investigation to know if it is reasonable to refrain from esophagogastrostomy in patients with a long interval between gastric radiotherapy and surgery.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35979123
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i17.5854
pmc: PMC9258348
doi:
Types de publication
Case Reports
Langues
eng
Pagination
5854-5860Informations de copyright
©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no competing interests to declare in the context of the current case.
Références
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Nov;88(5):1647-53
pubmed: 19853126
Surg Today. 2012 Apr;42(4):342-50
pubmed: 22200754
Dig Dis. 2013;31(1):21-9
pubmed: 23797119
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jul;102(1):215-22
pubmed: 27217296
Anticancer Res. 2019 Dec;39(12):6419-6430
pubmed: 31810906
J Thorac Oncol. 2014 Apr;9(4):534-40
pubmed: 24736077
J Thorac Dis. 2014 May;6 Suppl 3:S333-40
pubmed: 24876939
Ann Surg. 2019 Feb;269(2):291-298
pubmed: 29206677
N Engl J Med. 2012 May 31;366(22):2074-84
pubmed: 22646630
Surgery. 2010 Apr;147(4):491-6
pubmed: 20004440
Arch Surg. 2003 Mar;138(3):303-8
pubmed: 12611579
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2000 Jun;17(6):702-9
pubmed: 10856863
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;114(8):907-914
pubmed: 27774626
Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(8):457-63
pubmed: 27234222