High-Fidelity Simulation to Assess Task Load Index and Performance: A Prospective Observational Study.
Journal
Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation
ISSN: 2667-677X
Titre abrégé: Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim
Pays: Turkey
ID NLM: 101680817
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Aug 2022
Aug 2022
Historique:
entrez:
18
8
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
19
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The NASA Task Load Index is a questionnaire widely used in aviation. This index might help for attesting the quality of a scenario in high-fidelity simulation in healthcare. The main purpose of this study was to observe whether NASA Task Load Index for critical care-simulated scenarios, designed for residents, was consistent with the literature. The second purpose was to describe relationships between NASA Task Load Index, performance and generated stress during high-fidelity simulation. All residents in anaesthesia and intensive care undergoing high-fidelity simulation were included. The primary endpoint was the task load generated by each scenario assessed by NASA Task Load Index. Based on the literature, the NASA Task Load Index scores between 39 and 61 were considered an acceptable level. Stress level (Visual Analogue Scale) and specific technical and non-technical skills performances (Team Emergency Assessment Measure) were also assessed. Totally 53 residents actively participated in 1 of 10 different scenarios, between June and December 2017. The median NASA Task Load Index score of scenarios was 61 [48-65]. Five scenarios generated acceptable task load levels. There was no association between the NASA Task Load Index score and technical or non-technical skills performance scores, but an association between NASA Task Load Index and the stress level (rho=4.7, P =.001) was observed. Simulation scenarios generate different task loads for residents; the task load was deemed acceptable for half of the scenarios. The NASA Task Load Index could be considered as a tool to assess the pedagogic adequacy of scenarios. Scenario and generated stress level, but not task load, can modify residents' performance during simulation. This should be considered when planning normative simulation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35979975
doi: 10.5152/TJAR.2022.21234
pmc: PMC9524413
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
282-287Références
Simul Healthc. 2010 Oct;5(5):267-71
pubmed: 21330808
World J Surg. 2011 Sep;35(9):1961-9
pubmed: 21597890
Resuscitation. 2010 Apr;81(4):446-52
pubmed: 20117874
JAMA. 2011 Sep 7;306(9):978-88
pubmed: 21900138
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):85-93
pubmed: 20078759
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1969 Aug;33(4):448-57
pubmed: 5810590
J Surg Educ. 2019 May - Jun;76(3):864-871
pubmed: 30527702
Br J Anaesth. 2014 Feb;112(2):231-45
pubmed: 24368556
Surg Endosc. 2017 Oct;31(10):4044-4050
pubmed: 28281125
Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2018 Feb 1;89(2):115-121
pubmed: 29463356
Adv Simul (Lond). 2018 Dec 29;3:28
pubmed: 30619626
Learn Mem. 2010 Sep 30;17(10):522-30
pubmed: 20884754
Br J Anaesth. 2009 Nov;103(5):665-9
pubmed: 19776027
Br J Surg. 2018 Apr;105(5):491-501
pubmed: 29465749
Resuscitation. 2016 Apr;101:115-20
pubmed: 26708450
Biol Psychol. 2007 Feb;74(2):116-43
pubmed: 17049418
Anaesthesia. 2019 Apr;74(4):488-496
pubmed: 30768684
Acad Med. 2009 Oct;84(10 Suppl):S25-33
pubmed: 19907380
Med Teach. 2005 Jan;27(1):10-28
pubmed: 16147767
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016 Dec;35(6):407-416
pubmed: 27133235
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2013 Dec;26(6):714-20
pubmed: 24184884
Anesth Analg. 2004 May;98(5):1419-25, table of contents
pubmed: 15105224
Anesthesiology. 2020 Jul;133(1):198-211
pubmed: 32304404
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Mar;58(3):472-86
pubmed: 2324938