Responses of crop productivity and reactive nitrogen losses to the application of animal manure to China's main crops: A meta-analysis.
Crop productivity
Livestock manure
Meta-analysis
Reactive N losses
Substituting manure for fertilizer
Journal
The Science of the total environment
ISSN: 1879-1026
Titre abrégé: Sci Total Environ
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0330500
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 Dec 2022
01 Dec 2022
Historique:
received:
09
06
2022
revised:
03
08
2022
accepted:
12
08
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
7
10
2022
entrez:
18
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The effective utilization of manure in cropland systems is essential to sustain yields and reduce reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses. However, there are still uncertainties regarding the substitution of mineral nitrogen (N) fertilizer with manure in terms of its effects on crop yield and Nr losses. We conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis of wheat, maize, and rice applications in China and discovered that substituting mineral N fertilizer with manure increased wheat and maize yields by 4.9 and 5.5 %, respectively, but decreased rice yield by 1.7 %. The increase of yield is larger at low N application and low mineral N substitution rates ((SR) ≤30 %) for silt soils, warm regions, and acidic soils. High SR (>70 %) decreased rice yield as well as the N use efficiency of wheat and maize. Substitution of mineral N fertilizer with manure resulted in lower NH
Identifiants
pubmed: 35981586
pii: S0048-9697(22)05163-4
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158064
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Fertilizers
0
Manure
0
Soil
0
Carbon
7440-44-0
Nitrogen
N762921K75
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
158064Subventions
Organisme : Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
ID : BBS/E/C/000I0320
Pays : United Kingdom
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.