Impact of echocardiographic analyses of valvular event timing on myocardial work indices.
PSL
event timing
myocardial work
pressure–strain
Journal
European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging
ISSN: 2047-2412
Titre abrégé: Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101573788
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 02 2023
17 02 2023
Historique:
received:
18
04
2022
revised:
11
07
2022
accepted:
04
08
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
22
2
2023
entrez:
18
8
2022
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Valvular event timing is an integral part of echocardiographic pressure-strain loop (PSL) analyses. The impact that different event timing modalities may have on myocardial work indices is unknown. A methodological study was performed on 200 subjects, including 50 healthy subjects, 50 with aortic valve sclerosis, 50 with atrial fibrillation, and 50 with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Valvular event timing was estimated by visual assessment, spectral Doppler, and colour tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) M-mode. These valvular event timings were added to the same PSL analyses sequentially to acquire myocardial work indices, including global work index (GWI). For the 200 participants, the median age was 72 years, 50% were men, and mean blood pressure was 143/80 mmHg. Valvular event timings differed between all three modalities and so did all myocardial work indices. Compared with visual assessment, spectral Doppler resulted in a significantly higher GWI (mean difference: 114 ± 93 mmHg%, P < 0.001), and so did TDI (mean difference: 83 ± 90 mmHg%, P < 0.001). A higher GWI by spectral Doppler than by TDI was also observed (mean difference: 30 ± 53 mmHg%, P < 0.001). In the healthy subgroup, a systematic bias was observed for spectral Doppler compared with visual assessment (mean difference: 160 ± 77 mmHg%, P < 0.001), and a similar trend was noted for TDI vs. visual assessment (mean difference: 124 ± 74 mmHg%, P < 0.001). Myocardial work indices differ depending on the event timing modality used, with visual assessment yielding lower GWI values compared with Doppler-based methods. Serial PSL analyses should apply the same event timing method.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35981965
pii: 6671571
doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac171
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
314-323Subventions
Organisme : Capital Region of Denmark
Organisme : Kong Christian den Tiendes Fond
Organisme : Fru Asta Florida Bolding Mindelegat
Organisme : Danish Heart Foundation
ID : 18-R125-A8534-22083
Organisme : Fondsbørsvekselerer Henry Hansen og Hustrus Hovedlegat
Organisme : Lundbeck Foundation
Organisme : Novo Nordisk Foundation
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of interest: B.-S.: Steering Committee: Amgen financed GALACTIC-HF trial; the Boston Scientific financed LUX-Dx TRENDS trial; Advisory Board: Sanofi Pasteur; Amgen; Speaker Honorarium: Novartis; Sanofi Pasteur; GSK; research grant: GE Healthcare; Sanofi Pasteur. J.H.S.: advisory board, speaker fee, and research grant: Medtronic. P.S.: consulting fees and speaker honoraria for Biotronic. Remaining others: none.