Reliability and accuracy of dental MRI for measuring root canal length of incisors and canines: a clinical pilot study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 08 2022
18 08 2022
Historique:
received:
02
03
2022
accepted:
02
08
2022
entrez:
18
8
2022
pubmed:
19
8
2022
medline:
23
8
2022
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
To evaluate whether high-resolution, non-contrast-enhanced dental MRI (dMRI) can reliably and accurately measure the canal length of incisors and canines compared with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Three-Tesla dMRI was performed in 31 participants (mean age: 50.1 ± 14.2 years) with CBCT data. In total, 67 teeth were included (28 from the upper jaw and 39 from the lower jaw; 25 central incisors, 22 lateral incisors, and 20 canines). CBCT and dMRI datasets were reconstructed to visualize the root canal pathway in a single slice in the vestibulo-oral (V-O) and mesio-distal (M-D) direction. Root canal length was measured twice by two radiologists using dMRI and CBCT. Data were statistically analyzed by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and performing Bland-Altman analysis. The reliability of dMRI measurements was excellent and comparable to that of CBCT measurements (intra-rater I/intra-rater II/inter-rater was 0.990/0.965/0.951 for dMRI vs. 0.990/0.994/0.992 for CBCT in the M-D direction and 0.991/0.956/0.967 for dMRI vs. 0.998/0.994/0.996 for CBCT in the V-O direction). According to Bland-Altman analysis, the mean (95% confidence interval) underestimation of root canal lengths was 0.67 mm (- 1.22 to 2.57) for dMRI and 0.87 mm (- 0.29 to 2.04) for CBCT in the M-D direction/V-O direction. In 92.5% of cases, dMRI measurements of canal length had an accuracy within 0-2 mm. Visualization and measurement of canal length in vivo using dMRI is feasible. The reliability of dMRI measurements was high and comparable to that of CBCT measurements. However, the spatial and temporal resolution of dMRI is lower than that of CBCT, which means dMRI measurements are less accurate than CBCT measurements. This means dMRI is currently unsuitable for measuring canal length in clinical practice.
Identifiants
pubmed: 35982139
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17889-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-022-17889-3
pmc: PMC9388478
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
14068Informations de copyright
© 2022. The Author(s).
Références
Int Endod J. 2018 Oct;51(10):1077-1087
pubmed: 29618163
Eur Radiol. 2017 Dec;27(12):5104-5112
pubmed: 28698944
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Oct;22(5):612-621
pubmed: 32902067
J Endod. 2009 Feb;35(2):179-81
pubmed: 19166768
Br J Radiol. 2014 Oct;87(1042):20130654
pubmed: 25189417
Invest Radiol. 2022 May 25;:
pubmed: 35640007
J Endod. 1990 Oct;16(10):498-504
pubmed: 2084204
Eur Radiol. 1998;8(9):1558-64
pubmed: 9866761
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2019 Mar 1;111(3):256-263
pubmed: 30020493
Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4616-4623
pubmed: 26910905
Int J Dent. 2018 Oct 16;2018:2514243
pubmed: 30410540
Chin J Dent Res. 2021 Apr 23;24(1):49-54
pubmed: 33890455
J Endod. 2021 Jun;47(6):954-960
pubmed: 33774047
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Oct;26(10):1195-202
pubmed: 24893967
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011 Dec;112(6):825-42
pubmed: 22099859
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Mar;24(3):1339-1349
pubmed: 31352517
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Spring;14(2):125-129
pubmed: 32908654
Int Endod J. 2009 Jun;42(6):463-75
pubmed: 19298576
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008 Apr;105(4):e79-83
pubmed: 18329572
Int Endod J. 2008 Jan;41(1):6-31
pubmed: 17931388
Int Endod J. 2014 Jul;47(7):698-703
pubmed: 24134733
J Endod. 2016 Mar;42(3):397-401
pubmed: 26778266
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 01;11(6):
pubmed: 34205946
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2017;10(2):197-211
pubmed: 28555209
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001 Sep;92(3):335-40
pubmed: 11552155
J Endod. 1996 Nov;22(11):616-8
pubmed: 9198419
Eur Radiol. 2020 Dec;30(12):6392-6401
pubmed: 32960331
Int J Oral Sci. 2018 May 17;10(2):17
pubmed: 29777107
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct;120(4):508-12
pubmed: 26346911
BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88
pubmed: 29764458
Eur Radiol. 2020 Mar;30(3):1488-1497
pubmed: 31802215
J Endod. 2011 Feb;37(2):151-7
pubmed: 21238794
J Endod. 2012 Jul;38(7):884-8
pubmed: 22703648
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007 Jan;103(1):114-9
pubmed: 17178504
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016;45(1):20150177
pubmed: 26371075
J Endod. 2011 Aug;37(8):1046-51
pubmed: 21763892
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015 Dec;43(10):2175-82
pubmed: 26548530
Clujul Med. 2016;89(1):137-42
pubmed: 27004037
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Sep;29(9):922-930
pubmed: 30112833
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2006 Nov;35(6):410-6
pubmed: 17082331
J Endod. 2013 Dec;39(12):1607-10
pubmed: 24238457
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020 Jun;31(6):575-583
pubmed: 32105363
Oral Radiol. 2018 Jan;34(1):10-16
pubmed: 30484095
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2020 Jan;49(1):20190183
pubmed: 31530016