Implementation strategy mapping methods to improve autism intervention use in community settings: a study protocol.

Autism spectrum disorders Community mental health Implementation strategies

Journal

Implementation science communications
ISSN: 2662-2211
Titre abrégé: Implement Sci Commun
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101764360

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Aug 2022
Historique:
received: 01 07 2022
accepted: 09 08 2022
entrez: 18 8 2022
pubmed: 19 8 2022
medline: 19 8 2022
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Implementation strategies are purported to facilitate adoption and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) across settings. The use of tailored implementation strategies may be particularly effective, as they are selected with the explicit purpose of addressing setting-specific implementation determinants. However, methods to select and tailor implementation strategies, including in community settings, remain understudied. This project will identify and describe implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) from extant peer-reviewed literature and pilot test a method to match implementation strategies with determinants in low-resourced community mental health (CMH) agencies that deliver services to children on the autism spectrum. Aim 1: A scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines, will be conducted to identify implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) utilized in child mental health settings. Data extraction will identify and describe each ISMM, including identifying methodological and procedural steps, analyzing the frequency of ISMM use, and identifying outcomes measured in eligible ISMM studies. Aim 2: Using scoping review findings, select and pilot test one ISMM within five community mental health agencies in Michigan that provide services to autistic children. We will recruit five directors/agency leaders, supervisors, and direct providers at each of the eligible agencies (expected N = 25). A sequential explanatory (QUAN➔ QUAL) mixed methods design will be used. Participants will complete a demographics and client survey, as well as a needs assessment to identify implementation determinants. The impact of the ISMM on organizational readiness for change (from pre- to post-ISMM), as well as implementation outcomes of the ISMM (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability), will be examined. Semi-structured interviews will elicit stakeholder perspectives on the mapping method. The current project aims to advance our knowledge of methods for selecting, tailoring, and mapping implementation strategies to address context-specific determinants to implementation. Additionally, this project will contribute to growing science found at the intersection of implementation science and autism research by utilizing the implementation determinants framework, the CFIR, to guide data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings. Finally, these findings may support future EBP implementation efforts within low-resourced communities, with the ultimate goal of increasing equity in access to EBPs for autistic children.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Implementation strategies are purported to facilitate adoption and use of evidence-based practices (EBPs) across settings. The use of tailored implementation strategies may be particularly effective, as they are selected with the explicit purpose of addressing setting-specific implementation determinants. However, methods to select and tailor implementation strategies, including in community settings, remain understudied. This project will identify and describe implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) from extant peer-reviewed literature and pilot test a method to match implementation strategies with determinants in low-resourced community mental health (CMH) agencies that deliver services to children on the autism spectrum.
METHODS METHODS
Aim 1: A scoping review, following PRISMA guidelines, will be conducted to identify implementation strategy mapping methods (ISMMs) utilized in child mental health settings. Data extraction will identify and describe each ISMM, including identifying methodological and procedural steps, analyzing the frequency of ISMM use, and identifying outcomes measured in eligible ISMM studies. Aim 2: Using scoping review findings, select and pilot test one ISMM within five community mental health agencies in Michigan that provide services to autistic children. We will recruit five directors/agency leaders, supervisors, and direct providers at each of the eligible agencies (expected N = 25). A sequential explanatory (QUAN➔ QUAL) mixed methods design will be used. Participants will complete a demographics and client survey, as well as a needs assessment to identify implementation determinants. The impact of the ISMM on organizational readiness for change (from pre- to post-ISMM), as well as implementation outcomes of the ISMM (feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability), will be examined. Semi-structured interviews will elicit stakeholder perspectives on the mapping method.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
The current project aims to advance our knowledge of methods for selecting, tailoring, and mapping implementation strategies to address context-specific determinants to implementation. Additionally, this project will contribute to growing science found at the intersection of implementation science and autism research by utilizing the implementation determinants framework, the CFIR, to guide data collection, analysis, and interpretation of findings. Finally, these findings may support future EBP implementation efforts within low-resourced communities, with the ultimate goal of increasing equity in access to EBPs for autistic children.

Identifiants

pubmed: 35982456
doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00339-6
pii: 10.1186/s43058-022-00339-6
pmc: PMC9389766
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

92

Informations de copyright

© 2022. The Author(s).

Références

Implement Sci. 2009 Jul 14;4:38
pubmed: 19594942
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2020 Oct 31;6(1):167
pubmed: 33292770
Front Public Health. 2019 Jun 18;7:158
pubmed: 31275915
Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108
pubmed: 28851459
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2012 Sep;39(5):365-73
pubmed: 21533846
Front Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;7:3
pubmed: 30723713
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):141-6
pubmed: 26134548
Implement Sci. 2009 Aug 07;4:50
pubmed: 19664226
Implement Sci. 2014 Jan 10;9:7
pubmed: 24410955
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473
pubmed: 30178033
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jan 7;2(1):1
pubmed: 33413699
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2002 Jun;22(4):197-209
pubmed: 12072164
J Autism Dev Disord. 2021 Jun;51(6):1983-1994
pubmed: 32876827
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jul 17;2(1):78
pubmed: 34274027
Acad Med. 2014 Sep;89(9):1245-51
pubmed: 24979285
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;39(4):362-73
pubmed: 22892987
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42
pubmed: 31036028
J Autism Dev Disord. 2016 Jul;46(7):2275-84
pubmed: 26922192
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Aug;62:102735
pubmed: 34171493
Implement Sci. 2013 Dec 01;8:139
pubmed: 24289295
Implement Sci. 2022 Apr 12;17(1):26
pubmed: 35413917
Autism. 2022 Apr;26(3):569-574
pubmed: 34913394
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 3;7(4):e013318
pubmed: 28373250
J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;11(2):111-123
pubmed: 30369999
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 23;5(12):e009993
pubmed: 26700290
Autism. 2022 Apr;26(3):575-585
pubmed: 34866429
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2020 Mar 27;69(4):1-12
pubmed: 32214087
Implement Sci. 2015 Feb 12;10:21
pubmed: 25889199
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2017 Apr;44(2):177-194
pubmed: 26289563
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Nov;13(6):554-61
pubmed: 26553895
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2021 May;48(3):482-498
pubmed: 32948963

Auteurs

Aksheya Sridhar (A)

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA. sridha17@msu.edu.

Amy Drahota (A)

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Jessica E Tschida (JE)

Department of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.

Classifications MeSH